Uh-oh...
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
But nobody needs a diversion all the time.
See this is nice, we're talking, it's peaceful, no one is getting all upset or irritating.
Shucks...nobody to bitch slap...
Try it over on the other side of the street for a while. You might like it.
You used to post jokes all the time. When was the last time you did that?
He's made of sterner stuff than that. He'll be just fine.
a real fine echo-chamber in here! :mrgreen: Standard fare for CC deniers!
of course, once the details come forward it's understood that the authors found the issue in 8 of ~30 of the models... but that even within the 8, the resulting affect "averages out" to be a non-factor. None of the more profiled CMIP5 models have the issue. More pointedly, the paper itself states the issue doesn't have any impact on global temperature estimations. The issue reflects upon localized regional scales. But hey now member "skookumchuck" since you put your motor-mouth on mega-flap, are you aware of any CMIP5 models acting as localized regional "weather models"? :mrgreen:
of course, the global modeling community provides an inherent means for climate modelers to bring problems forward... all fully transparent and available online - a complete historical account of all problems identified in models and steps taken to review/resolve accordingly. Apparently, these authors felt a need to circumvent that normal practice and opt to create a formal paper. Geezaz, what's taking denier bloggers so long to tune into this historical account logging of identified problems... you know, so all you bedazzlers who know diddly about models can parrot something else - hey Locutus! :mrgreen:
of course, once the details come forward it's understood that the authors found the issue in 8 of ~30 of the models... but that even within the 8, the resulting affect "averages out" to be a non-factor. None of the more profiled CMIP5 models have the issue. More pointedly, the paper itself states the issue doesn't have any impact on global temperature estimations. The issue reflects upon localized regional scales. But hey now member "skookumchuck" since you put your motor-mouth on mega-flap, are you aware of any CMIP5 models acting as localized regional "weather models"? :mrgreen:
of course, the global modeling community provides an inherent means for climate modelers to bring problems forward... all fully transparent and available online - a complete historical account of all problems identified in models and steps taken to review/resolve accordingly. Apparently, these authors felt a need to circumvent that normal practice and opt to create a formal paper. Geezaz, what's taking denier bloggers so long to tune into this historical account logging of identified problems... you know, so all you bedazzlers who know diddly about models can parrot something else - hey Locutus! :mrgreen:
