I was ignoring the Canadian protests since they haven't yet started burning or destroying anything and it's not like they actually have any say in USA internal affairs. So let them yell at buildings.
Trump confirms he won't be challenging same sex marriage law
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
I was ignoring the Canadian protests since they haven't yet started burning or destroying anything and it's not like they actually have any say in USA internal affairs. So let them yell at buildings.
Walter is that you?
Okay I'll finish what MF didn't. While watching Trump on 60 minutes I caught something that was not challenged by Stahl.
When asked about the Supreme court and Roe vs Wade he said he appoint judges to defeat the law..
When asked about Gay marriage he said he won't touch it because it's already a law........
.Trump says 17-month-old gay marriage ruling is ‘settled’ law — but 43-year-old abortion ruling isn’t
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...led-law-but-43-year-old-abortion-ruling-isnt/
Yup. Trudeau likes big government as much as Trump.
And? You're expecting logical consistency from Trump and his supporters? They can't even admit to themselves that increased spending, higher taxes, bigger government and deficits isn't left-wing economics.
None of these are in his platform. Keep grasping at whatever straw makes you feel better. I always thought someone as stupid as you would have trouble in understanding simple concepts and appears I am right
All that your jurisprudence is left with is Abbott vs Costello
... or naybe, King Kong vs Godzilla ..
As Wesley said to Buttercup in the Princess Bride: "Get used to disappointment." The fact is that many of the Dumpster's promises are so contradictory he can't keep them all while still others are violations of the US constitution.
Of course, saying that he won't challenge the same-sex marriage decision is not the same as saying that he won't appoint justices who are likely to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges.
I think you will find that it will be difficult to overturn even if he does appoint conservative judges.
W.T.F. would anyone in his right mind take the lid off that can of worms? Pairing up weird people isn't such a bad idea and if a person chooses not to be involved with it he/she doesn't have to.
You pollsters have been wrong before. Where did you learn how to do that?
OBAMA ADMITS TO VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTION
Tells pro-immigration heckler "I just took an action to change the law”
Obama Admits To Violating The Constitution » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
President Obama’s Top Ten Constitutional Violations of 2015
Obama Violates Constitution -- Let Us Count the Ways, 2015 Edition
how could a teacher who claims to be an expert not know this?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMcZgxcj_FE
Possibly, if you want to get in the game, you may want to use some citations.
just a thought...
At this juncture of time and society there is too large a majority of citizens and legislators that support same-sex rights. It would be very difficult to overturn even if they could dig up some bizarre legal basis. The last ruling was constitutionally sound and lawful. On top of that with the current social climate the US is already extremely divided and close to a civil war and such a ruling may well be the final tipping point. I would suggest attempting to overturn Roe v Wade would probably give rise to a similar result.
That's what they said about Plessy v. Ferguson, which held that "separate but equal" segregation was Constitutional. 59 years later in Brown v. Topeka Board of Education, the Supremes held, 9-0, that "separate but equal" was unConstitutional. It has been 33 years since Roe v. Wade. That means 26 years to go, even ignoring the fact that everything moves much faster in the internet age.