Tories To Waste Billons On New Fighter Jets

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
11
Aether Island
I have a much better idea. Let's build great big stealth blimps and use them as stationary, high altitude weapons platforms with lasers and death rays of varying sorts and drop tanks made from indestructable nano carbon tubes.

Kinda like a mini death star but within the atmosphere.

Now that I'd pay for no problem.

Is the F-35 part of Star Wars? Will the "Empire Strike Back"?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,284
14,497
113
Low Earth Orbit
You can tell George Lucas was a total geek. There were no sexy robots in Star Wars.

I want sexy robots on the giant stealth blimp/death star.
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
11
Aether Island
Didn't you like the Empire's giant mechanical polar bears. Boooyyy, goose bumps of fear - good for two federal elections!
 

Ariadne

Council Member
Aug 7, 2006
2,432
8
38
From whom are we protecting our borders? The Danes? The Americans? The Icelanders? From refugee ships? From UFOs?

Has the threat been defined? Has the plane requisite to defend against this threat been thought through? Has the plane we think we need been through the tender process?

An obvious threat is illegal immigrants.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,284
14,497
113
Low Earth Orbit
Didn't you like the Empire's giant mechanical polar bears. Boooyyy, goose bumps of fear - good for two federal elections!
We best get on that.

I hear Iran started building a giant mechanical camel that can reach Israel on one tank of bunker oil.

The two hump model on the drawing board can reach Rome and beyond.
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
11
Aether Island
I think we used jets against the Fenians!

Then the Yanks cried "Fifty-four forty or fight!" Now we can yell "Eff thirty-five and we will!"
 

Starscream

Electoral Member
May 23, 2008
201
2
18
Somewhere, someplace
So you're hoping for an argument that you can win? How about you make the case for the aircraft and we can see what you make of that.

No I can handle my own in arguments without having to 'dumb down' the opposing side.

I'm hoping that the opposing side will use their brains and come up with better reasons (instead of the same two lame ducks) why the troops shouldn't have, or don't deserve to have, their equipment replaced with kit that serves them far better in their duty which is to defend this country (their primary mission) and to fullfill our commitments to our allies (NORAD, NATO), and lastely for peacekeeping (a hobby).

If Canadians are so commited to being against the Fores having the kit to do their jobs then why can't they come up with anything else?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
No I can handle my own in arguments without having to 'dumb down' the opposing side.

I'm hoping that the opposing side will use their brains and come up with better reasons (instead of the same two lame ducks) why the troops shouldn't have, or don't deserve to have, their equipment replaced with kit that serves them far better in their duty which is to defend this country (their primary mission) and to fullfill our commitments to our allies (NORAD, NATO), and lastely for peacekeeping (a hobby).

If Canadians are so commited to being against the Fores having the kit to do their jobs then why can't they come up with anything else?
Turn swords into plow shares (or tanks into tractors).

The only use for the military should be for helping out after natural disasters and preventing the country from being torn apart from within. Nobody is going to invade us because the US already owns our resources and nobody is going to phuk with them. We need to get out of NATO and NORAD. If we were only committed to helping our friends when attacked, that would be fine, but they expect us to join them in invading other countries, so I say, they are not real friends.

Oh, by the way, Starscraem, you sound like you play too many video games.
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
11
Aether Island