To IMPEACH ????
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
Good. Giuliani is just as wacko as his boss. Rudy Giuliani’s statement, "truth isn't truth", came in an August, 2018 when he told host Chuck Todd, from NBC’s “Meet the Press”, that Trump might “get trapped into perjury”, not that it would take much to catch Trump at perjury. lol
Neither Giuliani or Trump appear to be able to tell the difference between truth and fiction.
Last edited:
Irrelevant. Trump withheld it about an hour after he asked Zelensky for the "favour". After the house appropriations committee approved the aid, what he did was illegal according to the Government Accountability Office.
But you snowflakes don't care about his illegal shenanigans, huh?
The Mob doesn't want witnesses or documentation. oopps Sorry, I meant the Senate.
Yes, watched the doc a while ago. It's pretty obvvious depiction of Trump's lies and his complete disregard for the lesser classes, ecologies, and environments. As the saying goes, "Pave paradise and put up a parking lot" sort of issue. I'd invest in a couple dozen gophers, and hope lots of geese settle there. lol
Walter can be funny. If he doesn't like something or find it agreeable then it's "utter bull shit" - nothing to do with the reality of the situation.
A "negative" can quite often be provable. Just run up a debt and see how many people remind you.
I don't recall it written anywhere that class and respect are required characteristics for a sitting President, however I do believe it is a position that deserves respect and class, something that isn't currently seen.
I think signing articles of impeachment is a historic occasion considering the infrequency in which it takes place so it is not surprising that it is given attention. Smiling while taking part in the process? Perhaps not appropriate but you can bet if it were reversed and team Trump were signing the articles he would be giving the thumbs up with a big 'ole toothy grin.
Schiff not allowing Republicans to call witnesses?
Here’s what you need to know from the House impeachment resolution:
• Witness requests from ranking minority member Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., must go through Schiff first — but the decision to allow them is not Schiff’s alone.
• Trump gets counsel during Judiciary Committee hearings, but not during Intelligence Committee hearings. The Judiciary Committee leads official impeachment proceedings in the House, while the Intelligence Committee leads the investigation.
• The Democrats’ resolution does not require questions of witnesses to first be approved by Schiff.
That said, do you think it classy that the Trump administration is denying witnesses or documentation in the Senate trial?
Nope, I don't think it's classy that family members benefit financially from their family members political appointments, do you? Before you shake a fist at nepotism when it comes to Biden, perhaps you should consider shaking it at the Trump family:
https://www.gq.com/story/trump-kids-profit-presidency
Oh but it doesn't stop there for Trump, oh no, he also gives jobs to sons of his friends, Like Giulaini's son Andrew:
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/22/rud...-95000-as-sports-liaison-for-white-house.html
Nope, never convict before a fairl trial, not in my nature. I want to see all the facts, hear all the evidence and hear from all witnesses who have something to offer.
If it brings you satisfaction to call me or anyone else who has an outlook that differs from yours a snowflake (a cop out btw that is losing it's oomph) then continue on my friend. It's all good.