Foreign policy is the domain of the executive branch . Maybe you should check your sources .
To IMPEACH ????
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
Can you trust the accuracy of the Washington Post , they have been wrong on every narrative they tried to spin about Trump . How is that Russian collusion coming ? Still breathlessly awaiting the release of the Mueller report ?
What personal gain did Trump get ? Dirt on Uncle Joe ? Man there are reams and reams of dirt on Joe already , Trump doesn’t need help to beat Biden , shift the democrats don’t even want him as their nominee .
Of course he is a Republican . You would be singing the same tune no matter which of sixteen candidates beat Hillary . Sorry your side had a terrible candidate and it sure seems they are trying hard to emulate that state in 2020 . Sucks to be you . But look at the bright side , we here in Canada have a dreamboat who is well mannered , intelligent , articulate and a darn fine PM . You should be proud .
So did Joe Biden act in accordance to his office when he withheld aid to Ukraine for political favours ?
Quote one testimony that specifically convicts Trump.
I can't.
No one can.
There's evidence being compiled that COULD convict Trump and testimony to that effect, but actual conviction will be up to the Senate.
With that note out of the way:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gordon...impeachment-hearings-live-updates-2019-11-20/
There's Sondland's opening testimony
But specifically, under the section labeled Quid Pro Quo:
That alone, right there, should have been end story.
exactly.. and continue to operate that way as if it is the norm. They have a skill in normalizing the abnormal.
Trump is constant;y breaching the rule of law regardless of who else is involved, whether it's the Ukraine, the Pentagon, the law itself, etc. And that's despite the advice of his closest staff and he's got no answer for it when he's called on it. Dude's a walking disaster waiting to happen.Ohhhhhhhhhh! It's seems to be pretty close to the central theme of the entire charade. Why is Ukraine being mentioned at all? I think it could be argued that a person should be able to expect a semblance of privacy in a phone conversation! It's likely to all end up being tossed anyway, methinks. A couple of months from now I predict Trump will still be in the White House and a lot of people will be wondering how this shit ever happened. The Drama Queens will sure be pissed off he wasn't convicted of treason and sentenced to "The Needle".
lmao Not just his opinion unless you want to call Trump himself, Mulvaney, Pompeo, and several other senior staff liars, too.
Not for a lack of trying. His staff are currently trying to find a way around his withholding the funding for the Ukraine because withholding it is probably illegal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_United_States
If you say different then put up or shut up.
And Mulvaney corroborates, "There was quid pro quo. Get over it". No doubt Giuliani, et al could add support, too.
