This and more...

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,537
8,141
113
B.C.
This is the insanity of being politically correct. Social justice warriors have managed to intimidate the system to such a degree, that experts and Government officials are afraid to condemn the protests, for fear of being called racist.
You vote for them .
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,537
8,141
113
B.C.
Actually, he has your buddy pegged. I mean, your buddy called me a trump supporter. He/she/it, and I use that because I have no real idea anymore what he/she/it is, obviously doesnt pay attention at all. This can only lead to one outcome. He/she/it is a complete moron and doesnt know her/his/its ass from a hole in the ground.
Do you ?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,537
8,141
113
B.C.
Show me where I have supported that egotistic moron. Show me where I have supported any fu cking american president. For the most part, aside from a few friends I have down there, show me where I supported any american , period. Eagle used to refer to me as an american hater on a regular basis. So your friend is just proving itself to be an idiot with no real understanding. It looks at things out of a preconceived insular lens with no thought what so ever. It has been brainwashed with the idea that if one doesnt agree 100% with its outlook, then that person is the polar opposite of what they are, and they are a far left leaning dingbat. No real difference between it, and wacky wally our resident right wing dingbat.
Eagle is correct . You are simply a hater . For such a open minded unbiased commenter you sure hare a lot . By the way F. U . Too
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Eagle is correct . You are simply a hater . For such a open minded unbiased commenter you sure hare a lot . By the way F. U . Too

I hare a lot?

You're going to have to explain what that is. The only "hare" I know is a rabbit, and that just doesn't make sense. Then again, it is you writing it.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,537
8,141
113
B.C.
I dont give 2 fu cks what your supposed observations are. Everytime you open your trap you prove your extreme ignorance to everyone here.
Yes shoot the messenger again . You are good at that . Convincing people with counter argument, not so much .
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,537
8,141
113
B.C.
OK, I guess it's because I hare a lot.
No because you are a self righteous prick who thinks his shit doesn’t stink . Never drank , never smoked , never tried illicit drugs but knows tolerance and understanding. . F.U.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
No because you are a self righteous prick who thinks his shit doesn’t stink . Never drank , never smoked , never tried illicit drugs but knows tolerance and understanding. . F.U.


Where did I say I never smoked? There you go again, showing your ignorance and making shit up.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,860
2,737
113
New Brunswick
Here ya go, banned target rifles and shotguns. The rifles and guns Canadian Olympians use.

https://thegunblog.ca/2020/06/01/gun-bans-target-olympic-athletes-shooting-federation-of-canada/


So yes, I looked at the link, read it repeatedly, and looked deeper, because banning guns for target shooting a la Olympics would have fallen into that "make it clearer" category that I said the ban had to... make clearer?


Spent about 45 minutes looking for specifics. Found nada.


I did find that, in a general sense, that it is likely those guns used in target Olympic sports could be seen as banned under these new rules.


But then I also learned there are exemptions in the law that allow for such guns to be owned and transported even.


So... I'd have to throw out there that this opinion piece - which it is - is currently incorrect.


https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/f-11.6/fulltext.html


I will ETA: it IS hard to find directly the answer to that question of exceptions and I still believe that it needs to be clearer to the layman of what guns are okay and what aren't, and what is iffy because there's gonna be iffy.


But then that's me, I like a KISS model for stuff like this.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,414
14,307
113
Low Earth Orbit
So yes, I looked at the link, read it repeatedly, and looked deeper, because banning guns for target shooting a la Olympics would have fallen into that "make it clearer" category that I said the ban had to... make clearer?
Spent about 45 minutes looking for specifics. Found nada.
I did find that, in a general sense, that it is likely those guns used in target Olympic sports could be seen as banned under these new rules.
But then I also learned there are exemptions in the law that allow for such guns to be owned and transported even.
So... I'd have to throw out there that this opinion piece - which it is - is currently incorrect.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/f-11.6/fulltext.html
I will ETA: it IS hard to find directly the answer to that question of exceptions and I still believe that it needs to be clearer to the layman of what guns are okay and what aren't, and what is iffy because there's gonna be iffy.
But then that's me, I like a KISS model for stuff like this.
You are confusing the new ban with older law.

In other words you are already okay with current laws and handling methods used for restricted weapons.

Thank you. We need more people to understand that what we already have was working.

Spread what you've realized far and wide.
 
Last edited:

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,860
2,737
113
New Brunswick
You are confusing the new ban with older law.


Nope, check the link; it's updated law.


In other words you are already okay with current laws and handling methods used for restricted weapons.


Nope.


Thank you. We need more to understand that we already have was working.

Spread what you've realized far and wide.


I recognize that people adore their metallic sookie blankets and their recreational weapons.


I also recognize that there are still loopholes into nutcases getting a hold of weapons and using them to slaughter people and I think it needs to be tidied up.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I also recognize that there are still loopholes into nutcases getting a hold of weapons and using them to slaughter people and I think it needs to be tidied up.


Tell us how, even a complete ban on all weapons in Canada, would have stopped the Nova Scotia Dentist.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,414
14,307
113
Low Earth Orbit
Nope, check the link; it's updated law.
Nope.
I recognize that people adore their metallic sookie blankets and their recreational weapons.
I also recognize that there are still loopholes into nutcases getting a hold of weapons and using them to slaughter people and I think it needs to be tidied up.
I did check the link it took me to this from 1995

Firearms Act
S.C. 1995, c. 39

Assented to 1995-12-05


You are happy with current laws. Thank you.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
So yes, I looked at the link, read it repeatedly, and looked deeper, because banning guns for target shooting a la Olympics would have fallen into that "make it clearer" category that I said the ban had to... make clearer?
Spent about 45 minutes looking for specifics. Found nada.
I did find that, in a general sense, that it is likely those guns used in target Olympic sports could be seen as banned under these new rules.
But then I also learned there are exemptions in the law that allow for such guns to be owned and transported even.
So... I'd have to throw out there that this opinion piece - which it is - is currently incorrect.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/f-11.6/fulltext.html
I will ETA: it IS hard to find directly the answer to that question of exceptions and I still believe that it needs to be clearer to the layman of what guns are okay and what aren't, and what is iffy because there's gonna be iffy.
But then that's me, I like a KISS model for stuff like this.
That is just one of many problems we find with the gun laws, lack of clarity. Also the way the new rules were introduced without any consultation with gun owners,our elected representitives or sporting goods store owners.