Theresa May rebukes US for 'inappropriate' attack on Israel

[Serryah]

And Christianity should matter why?

Oh, because they originally caused this, because of the desire to rush the 2nd coming of Jesus?

IMO Christians should stay the hell out of it, they've done enough damage.

 

[Danbones]

It's the "Palestinians" who don't give a toss about peace.

you don't like the immigrants who have invaded london ( by leave of the bankers)
but the palistinians should just put up with the illegal invasion of israelis ( by leave of the bankers?)
get tossed

there is NO YAHWAY who gives out (other peoples')real estate
jewish or christian...and no mohammad either...all were inventions
so that ends it right there

...and the freedom of brexit?
naw, after all the freedom britain has yaken from other over the years
If that freedom ain't for everyone - you don't deserve it yourself
stay slaves forever then..you always be one in your head

 

[petros]

And Christianity should matter why?

Oh, because they originally caused this, because of the desire to rush the 2nd coming of Jesus?

IMO Christians should stay the hell out of it, they've done enough damage.

I didn't think you were smart enough to understand and you have proven me correct. Good job.

 

[Blackleaf]

you don't like the immigrants who have invaded london ( by leave of the bankers)
but the palistinians should just put up with the illegal invasion of israelis ( by leave of the bankers?)
get tossed

there is NO YAHWAY who gives out (other peoples')real estate
jewish or christian...and no mohammad either...all were inventions
so that ends it right there

...and the freedom of brexit?
naw, after all the freedom britain has yaken from other over the years
If that freedom ain't for everyone - you don't deserve it yourself
stay slaves forever then..you always be one in your head

What a load of rubbish that post is.

 

[Serryah]

I didn't think you were smart enough to understand and you have proven me correct. Good job.

I proved what, that I think Christians are also to blame, but in the end, they don't figure into things as much as Israel and the Palestinians?

We're talking all of Israel here; my opinion about Jerusalem is a whole other story.

I didn't prove anything.

 

[MHz]

The third side being...?

The right of return for the ones who ran for their lives since UN 181 was put into law. That is the conditions the Arabs refuse to let go of and it is the one the Jews in Israel demand be the first one to be made permanent as the number is now enough to make Arabs the voting majority. I also expect the Jews would promote that it would be 'bad news for them' when the reality is they would just be moved down the social scale from the 'elite' to the service and manual labor industries when their ambitions are to run the world from their seat of power in Jerusalem, or in this case, the city-state that controls all other city -states. After all it was the Rothschild family that came out with the the 'don't care who runs the country if they get to be in charge of the money supply.'

 

[mentalfloss]

Kerry's the man.

 

[EagleSmack]

 

[Jinentonix]

The UK and Israel are both tiny nations as their voice should reflect that in that both would have to suck up to Russia or China (or both) to replace the support the US has given both those nations. Pulled the UK out of losing a war 2x and vetoed many UN resolutions on Israel's behalf over the last 60 odd years. Israel will get by and the whole area will thrive rather than just the sliver of land that the River Jordan drains.
If America is on the decline on the global stage that might prompt some of the more educated Jews to opt for the land of Israel if opportunity to present a plan that would cover the development of the watershed for a few more local rivers than just the Jordan. Getting a wage for that task means the ones planting and harvesting according to those recommendations does not entitle the draftsmen a cut of those profits.
If they are excellent at their job they will get other contracts rather than Israel automatically being the general contractor for the globe.


Really?? Creating permanent living conditions like this is how somebody (with an over abundance of working brain cells in their own opinion) can cause conditions like this and then prevent any reconstruction. Maybe you buy the fable but I'm a bit more of a critical thinker than you are.

Considering the Israeli war budget and the size and strength of Gaza I would say Israel has lost the war.

Your version of history really needs a violin playing in the background to be effective as the way you present it it presents opinions as facts when all your points are nothing but propaganda. One video published by Miko Peled woul lay all your 'facts' as being lies for lack of a better term. If you really believe your post is truthful then you would accept the challenge that refutes his version of the history of the place since the end of WWII. I don't think you will accept the challenge because the 'facts' are not on your side.

What challenge? You challenged nothing. All you did was post a picture, mention some video with no link and claim I'm wrong. Kind'a hard to take up the challenge when you've said absolutely nothing to refute one word I said. Not one.
And listen f*ckhead, I don't do REVISIONIST history. You give one single source. I use MULTIPLE sources so I can flesh out what is fact and what is fiction.
Your source also claims that Israel is responsible for the 1967 war, which is hilarious. That's like blaming Poland for Germany invading them. So right off the bat your source loses credibility, regardless of who he is.
Miko and your problem is, you see nothing wrong with Hamas launching rocket and terror attacks on Israel while they use public and residential buildings to direct and conduct their war of terror. But the moment Israel retaliates, they're the bad guys engaging in genocide.

But here's a fun fact for you. The Palestinian authority unwittingly let slip a rather inconvenient stat. After Israel retaliates to rocket attacks from Palestine and bombs the crap out of the location the attack(s) came from, there's an inordinately high number of dead Palestinian males aged 17-35 in the aftermath. This "phenomenon" has been occurring for at least the last 25 years.

Let's look at a somewhat similar situation elsewhere and you'll see that the hate for Israel in the West is purely racist. Remember during the 1st Gulf War and Saddam was using human shields? The West erupted in outrage over it, condemning it as the war crime and crime against humanity that it is. But when Hamas does it, no condemnation at all, that's saved for the Israeli retaliation. Even by self-hating Jews like Peled.

 

[MHz]

Really?? Then why is the dog hiding it's face?? Be back as soon as I walk mine for the more challenging post.

 

[MHz]

What challenge? You challenged nothing. All you did was post a picture, mention some video with no link and claim I'm wrong. Kind'a hard to take up the challenge when you've said absolutely nothing to refute one word I said. Not one.

Your post was a void of links as mine was. I can fix that with accurate videos. Feel free to skip ahead to 6:00 for the 'history lesson'. Is it not up to you to provide something that refutes what the speaker is promoting?? A link or two would work as long as I get to question their accuracy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOaxAckFCuQ&t=376s

And listen f*ckhead, I don't do REVISIONIST history. You give one single source. I use MULTIPLE sources so I can flesh out what is fact and what is fiction.

Whatever that means. Revisionist rather than f*ckhead as I already know what they sound like. Perhaps your history lesson should include some earlier history as well.

Frankly speaking against Zionism in 1961: Benjamin H. Freedman speech at the Willard Hotel. Transcripts:http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/is...
There are also opposiing arguments
http://www.redstate.com/diary/barrypo...
Some crazy people have taken over Wikipedia pages on B.H.Freedman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AB...
The Truth will stand on its own merit
by Benjamin H. Freedman
Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman in New York City. He was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He defected from the Jewish movement in 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and most of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the USA.

Freedman had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations involved in gaining power in the USA. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

Available speech transcripts

ƒtƒBƒ“ƒyƒVƒA‚Å”¯‚Ì–Ñ‚ð‘�‚â‚»‚¤

Frankly speaking against Zionism in 1961: Benjamin H. Freedman speech at the Willard Hotel. Transcripts:http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/is...
There are also opposiing arguments
http://www.redstate.com/diary/barrypo...
Some crazy people have taken over Wikipedia pages on B.H.Freedman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AB...
The Truth will stand on its own merit
by Benjamin H. Freedman
Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman in New York City. He was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He defected from the Jewish movement in 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and most of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the USA.

Freedman had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations involved in gaining power in the USA. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

Available speech transcripts

ƒtƒBƒ“ƒyƒVƒA‚Å”¯‚Ì–Ñ‚ð‘�‚â‚»‚¤

Your source also claims that Israel is responsible for the 1967 war, which is hilarious. That's like blaming Poland for Germany invading them. So right off the bat your source loses credibility, regardless of who he is.

The difference is Germany put boots on the ground. Israel bombed Egyptian airfields before any aircraft had been used in any attacks against Israel.
The odds are pretty high that the Liberty was attacked because she had picked up Israeli pilots questioning HQ about bombing Egyptian soldiers that had raised a white flag while still well south of Israel's southern border. Like it or not when 'defending yourself' results in explosions in other nations that is a war of aggression rather than one of defense.
You can call an elephant's trunk a leg but that doesn't make it one.

Miko and your problem is, you see nothing wrong with Hamas launching rocket and terror attacks on Israel while they use public and residential buildings to direct and conduct their war of terror. But the moment Israel retaliates, they're the bad guys engaging in genocide.

You are trying to put words in my mouth. If I kill somebody that is attacking me I don't go to to jail. If I kill him after he is trying to run away then I do go to jail for murder. 'Proportional response' is also a term that is used in a court of law and so far you have not mentioned that the 'Hamas rockets' have no exploding warheads or that the empty desert is where they usually land. Israel designs bombs just to be used in an act of collective punishment as shown in the bombing campaigns that are weeks long in duration and stopping before the full plan has unfolded is not an option that is on the table. Bunker buster munitions for something as dangerous as a 'bottle rocket'.

But here's a fun fact for you. The Palestinian authority unwittingly let slip a rather inconvenient stat. After Israel retaliates to rocket attacks from Palestine and bombs the crap out of the location the attack(s) came from, there's an inordinately high number of dead Palestinian males aged 17-35 in the aftermath. This "phenomenon" has been occurring for at least the last 25 years.

Most headlines that I have seen about rocket attacks from the south of Gaza to the barren desert of Israel results in a strike on several targets in the far north of Gaza.
I don't doubt your stats, I question if there is not a manipulation of the facts to arrive at a headline that is more lie than fact.

Let's look at a somewhat similar situation elsewhere and you'll see that the hate for Israel in the West is purely racist. Remember during the 1st Gulf War and Saddam was using human shields? The West erupted in outrage over it, condemning it as the war crime and crime against humanity that it is. But when Hamas does it, no condemnation at all, that's saved for the Israeli retaliation. Even by self-hating Jews like Peled.

The Kuwaiti girl was a false flag that did get a lot of public sympathy. That it was a total lie is besides the point. Saddam went into Kuwait to stop the slant drilling that was taking Iraqi oil without paying for it. If you want to be honest let's at least put all the cards on the table rather than the ones that make Israel look good and everybody look like the bad guy.

For Gaza the reward for the 1967 War was 20 years of military occupation, brutal military occupation, and it was 20 years later that Hamas first became a political party. (in name only)

Since the 70 year anniversary of UN 181 and it's ramifications is coming up to 70 years there should be a special celebration if it was 70 years if the plan unfolding that would result in UN 181 being a real document.

I'm quite sure the Jews would be voicing some complaints if their streets looked like the ones in Gaza do.

Such a long lasting action must have a goal in mind that is generations down the line from the first ones to suffer 'violent control as being part of your daily life'.
If they ever surrendered I assume the equivalent of Canada's Residential Schools would be the next phase of the operation meant to exterminate a heritage.

I also don't think Jews would be picked on if Arabs ran the Government and they focused more on religious studies than the day-to-day affairs that come with running a country that is vibrant. Having OPEC as 'cousins' means 'gifts' would be a lot more in total than what the Jews have been getting as most of that was weapons related. That will also be 'similar' to neighboring countries as they also enjoy a thriving economy and the citizens jump into the 21st century mode quite easily.

 

[MHz]

Still waiting for that rebuttal, . . .

 

[Kathie Bondar]

Theresa May has attacked the current US administration over its condemnation of the Israeli government, in comments which appeared to align her with Donald Trump.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman criticised John Kerry, the outgoing US Secretary of State, after he described the Israeli government as the "most Right-wing in history."

Mrs May does “not believe that it is appropriate” for Mr Kerry to attack the make-up of the democratically elected Israeli government, the spokesman said.

Theresa May rebukes US for 'inappropriate' attack on Israel

Theresa May has attacked the current US administration over its condemnation of the Israeli government

Peter Dominiczak, Political Editor
29 December 2016
The Telegraph

Theresa May has attacked the current US administration over its condemnation of the Israeli government, in comments which appeared to align her with Donald Trump.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman criticised John Kerry, the outgoing US Secretary of State, after he described the Israeli government as the “most Right-wing in history”.

Mrs May does “not believe that it is appropriate” for Mr Kerry to attack the make-up of the democratically elected Israeli government, the spokesman said.

Her decision to speak out came as president-elect Trump accused Barack Obama and his government of treating Israel with “total disdain and disrespect”.

Mr Kerry had criticised Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, for undermining the two-state solution with his settlement policy in the West Bank.

Secretary of State John Kerry delivers a speech on Middle East peace at The U.S. Department of State. Credit: 2016 Getty Images/2016 Getty Images

Britain also recently angered Israel by backing a UN Security Council resolution calling for an end to Israel’s construction of settlements in the disputed region.

The US broke with tradition by abstaining rather than vetoing the text, in what was seen as a hostile act by President Obama.

Mr Trump defended the Israeli government, urging them to “stay strong” until his inauguration as president next month.

US Secretary of State John Kerry has criticised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Credit: AFP/AFP

Downing Street has made clear that Mrs May was still opposed to Israel’s “illegal” construction of settlements in the West Bank.

It said her criticism was directed at Mr Kerry’s decision to attack the make-up of the Israeli government.

“We do not… believe that the way to negotiate peace is by focusing on only one issue, in this case the construction of settlements, when clearly the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is so deeply complex,” Mrs May’s spokesman said.

“And we do not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an ally. The Government believes that negotiations will only succeed when they are conducted between the two parties, supported by the international community.”

The spokesman added: “The British Government continues to believe that the only way to a lasting peace in the Middle East is through a two-state solution. We continue to believe that the construction of settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories is illegal.”

Mr Kerry’s speech drew a furious reaction from Mr Netanyahu, who said the US diplomat focused “obsessively” on Jewish settlements and “barely touched” on Palestinian opposition to a Jewish state in any form.

A US State Department spokesperson told the Telegraph: "We are surprised by the UK Prime Minister’s statement given that Secretary Kerry’s remarks - which covered the full range of threats to a two state solution, including terrorism, violence, incitement and settlements - were in-line with the UK’s own longstanding policy and its vote at the United Nations last week.”

Theresa May rebukes US for 'inappropriate' attack on Israel

Hurrah for John Kerry! Finally some American politician actually stands up for justice. And with all those Jewish voters in New York

 

[MHz]

Too bad he has only a few weeks left at that job so it is all for show..

 

[Curious Cdn]

Hurrah for John Kerry! Finally some American politician actually stands up for justice. And with all those Jewish voters in New York

The US has gone out on a thin limb for Israel for decades with no reciprocity from Israel. 9/11 would never have happened, for example, had it not been for that unwavering, "through thick and thin" support of Israel. So, when an American politician finally points out their intransigence, he is attacked by the Israeli PM. this is a deeply asymmetric relationship and the Americans are about to be used, once again.

 

[MHz]

You have no idea how used America is to their own detriment.