I was thinking that. Never did like text and MSNeseThanks in advance I believe.
So can we assume by your silence, you find the following...I really do not understand the need for personal attacks, and to the extent that I am guilty of stooping to that level, from hereonin, I will respond to all personal attacks by ignoring them.
...a personal attack?Good, then let's head back to post #94.
Do you have any material that can refute the material that I presented, that shows the flaws and falsehoods promoted by your source?
OK, I did just that in post #94...
Now what?
Really? His testimony was immediately taken that night, and a matter of public record.The fact that there was a doorman was kept secret for at least 7 years.
A whole lot of BS there.
The fact that there was a doorman was kept secret for at least 7 years.
Whole lot of mention here:
The Men Who Killed Lennon
Yoko was in shock over the murder of her husband, she simply went with the best available ebvidence at the time, which is the only thing she could do.
All I see is more reference links to a a web site that promotesconspiracy....about as credible as if I quoted the national inquirer :lol:
Cool, then can you prove post #94 wrong?I agree, it is not healthy to take things personally.
A Court of Law found Chapman guilty, because witnesses saw him do it, and he admitted to doing it.Appendix C:Transcript of competency hearing for Mark David Chapman, June 22, 1981
Judge: Justice Dennis Edwards
Assistant DA: Allan Sullivan
Court appointed defense attorney: Jonathon Marks
AI have a serious question for you. This professor who claims that Senator Paul Wellstone was murdered, do you agree with him, or do you think he is wrong?
YouTube - The Senator Wellstone Assassination
A 1947 memo, found in 1975 by a scholar going through a pile of recently released FBI documents, supports Giancana's contention. In the memo, addressed to a congressional committee investigating organized crime, an FBI assistant states: "It is my sworn testimony that one Jack Rubenstein of Chicago ... is performing information functions for the staff of Congressman Richard Nixon, Republican of California.
Having just read the entire transcript...In the 1992 King interview, Nixon maintained he'd never had any interest in digging into the JFK assassination: "I don't see a useful purpose in getting into that and I don't think it's frankly useful for the Kennedy family to constantly raise that up again."
He never blamed the Kennedy's.Did Nixon ever stop blaming the Kennedy family? Thank God Teddy outlived him.
Probably not. Considering she was one of JFK's tarts, I would expect to see it there.Here's something interesting I surfed upon"
[SIZE=+1]"In 1972, actress Veronica Hamel and her then husband became the new owners of Marilyn Monroe's Brentwood home. When they hired a contractor to replace the roof and remodel the house the contractor discovered a sophisticated eavesdropping and telephone tapping system that covered every room in the house. The components were not commercially available in 1962, but were in the words of a retired Justice Department official, "standard FBI issue." The new owners spent $100,000 to remove the bugging devices from the house."[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]That's just one single paragraph.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Is there anything in this one paragraph that is not a fact?
[/SIZE]
But the cover up ultimately exposed the truth and Nixon was proven to be a crook. Go figure. Where's the conspiracy?This is what I find so fascinating about Richard Nixon -
High level obstructions of justice within the FBI made the Watergate investigation superficial, but the cover up ultimately exposed the truth.
Ya, to bad the assassination happened before Nixon became President.The Kennedy assassination investigation is no different because, having successfully obscurred what Nixon called "the factual truth," high level obstruction of justice within the FBI made the Kennedy assassination investigation an absolute whitewash, and the cover up is the crime.
They do not rely on any single source, they quote everybody and they reach the best conclusion, given all the available evidence.
Cool, then can you prove post #94 wrong?
Can you prove Perdomo didn't die in a Cuban prison?
Can you prove that it was Perdomo and not Stephan King?
A Court of Law found Chapman guilty, because witnesses saw him do it, and he admitted to doing it.
Case closed.
A
t 6:05, he says "stuff that appears to have been made up". (This is where I call him a liar)
Is Conry's own hand writing and the discrepancies in his own log book, made up?
Why would Conry's own wife tell investigator's that her husband had stopped wearing his FAA required corrective lenses?
The bitch!
At 10:59, he stataes that the FBI rapid response team had been there since noon. Then at 11:03 he misrepresents the fact that Paul Macabe from the FBI, said the FBI rapid response team didn't get there until 3:30, when in fact Macabe said the crash investigation team, didn't get there until 3:30.
Anybody can get the specs and data for the KingAir100...
King Air : Hawker Beechcraft (Raytheon) : Tool and Equipment List : Tronair
At 51:50, he says check his facts with his book.
There's nothing like saying believe me, by reading what I already said.
at 52:50 he gets mad when he's told A NorthWest AirLink crashed in Hibbing, under similar circumstances, so it is not highly implausible, as he said.
Then he goes into a tirade about the kid, that's a typical tactic, can't refute the facts, attack the messenger. Kind of like your tactics, when I proved you wrong, you refuse to acknowledge that, and then defend your "facts", you instead went on about how I'm an apologist, my mind is clouded with toxins, and so on.
Now lets just throw commonsense out the window and claim Raytheon went to Minnisota and painted a charter aircraft, with white phosphorous. (This is where I question his sanity)
Now, shall we examine Wellstones "stellar" Democratic Senate career?
He has been described as lack luster and milk toast.
And the most damning of all facts, if he's right, he should be dead, by his own damn logic no less.
Oh brother!
Where to start?
1, The Jack Rubenstein sought by HUAC was not Jack "Ruby" Rubenstein.
2, The young "communist" from the National Bureau of Young Communist League, Jack Rubenstein, did however assist Nixon, while researching his two monographs for HUAC.
3, The supposed source of the document, has stated that J. David Truby lied about receiving that document from his files.
4, There is even a great deal of contention about the documents authenticity among conspiracy theorists.
5, Jack "Ruby" Rubenstein, was a resident of Dallas in 47.
This is one of those moments, when I, if I were pursuing this "mystery" as you are, would raise an eyebrow and say, oh oh?
But I'm not driven by an ideology. Nor am I prone to ignoring facts to make a theory plausible.
Having just read the entire transcript...
CNN.com - Transcripts
I would suggest you try doing some of your own research, instead of taking someone else's word for what the context of that comment was.
He never blamed the Kennedy's.
Probably not. Considering she was one of JFK's tarts, I would expect to see it there.
Your point?
But the cover up ultimately exposed the truth and Nixon was proven to be a crook. Go figure. Where's the conspiracy?
Ya, to bad the assassination happened before Nixon became President.
Please do try and acknowledge time lines. They are important.
And please stop reporting posts that are not against forum rules. It just makes you look weak and silly.
Who never plead guilty...:roll:A Court of law convicted Guy Paul Morin and he was absolutely innocent.
Me being one of them. But I did read the court transcripts from Chapman's trial, as well as the bulk of Guy Paul Morin's. The two are not even remotely similar. But that was a nice try.I think most people realize that the Court System is BROKEN !
I'd agree, if that wasn't the most pathetic stretch of the imagination I'd ever witnessed.