Funny that no one tells me why it is still the same weather here on the wet coast since I was born .
When is it going to get warmer and drier ?
Still failed to address the facts.
It's okay to be wrong guys.
It's part of the learning process.
Are you saying he's wrong just because it's a blog?
That's mighty assumptive.
Are you saying he's wrong just because it's a blog?
That's mighty assumptive.
Didn't the whole energy crunch thing crop up just when the US was having trouble paying it's monthly energy bill without openly robbing the people? About the same time that 'they' started the equal to the industrial revolution in England and saying it is something that shouldn't have happened.China and India... they still get a pass. They are not even considered in any alarmists scams.
Didn't the whole energy crunch thing crop up just when the US was having trouble paying it's monthly energy bill without openly robbing the people? About the same time that 'they' started the equal to the industrial revolution in England and saying it is something that shouldn't have happened.
All of the scienticians claiming expertise and support for AGW have been dead wrong to date... Other than this is some idiot that shares the same ideology as you, what makes you believe there is any accuracy whatsoever in his (unfounded) claims?
Aren't you the first guy to dismiss claims against your beliefs because of the source or if it comes from a blog?
Quantum mechanics plays a crucial, albeit often overlooked, role in our understanding of the Earth's climate. In this talk three well known aspects of quantum mechanics are invoked to present a simple physical picture of what will happen as the concentrations of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide continue to increase. Historical and paleoclimatic records are interpreted with some basic astronomy, fluid mechanics, and the use of fundamental laws of physics such as the conservation of angular momentum. Live simulations will illustrate the basic physical principles governing large scale atmospheric circulation. I conclude by discussing some possible ways that physics might be able to contribute to a deeper understanding of climate change.
In the fall of 1945, the U.S. Army completed its work on ENIAC, the world's first vacuum-tube computer. All told, ENIAC weighed more than 30 tons (27 metric tons), had the footprint of a small house and cost nearly half a million dollars to create [source: Weik]. Fortunately, by the time ENIAC was built, Bell Laboratories was already well on its way to developing a replacement for power-hungry, space-consuming vacuum tubes: the transistor. Transistors act as both an amplifier and a switch for electronic signals, functions essential to virtually all modern electronic equipment, and without quantum mechanics, they likely wouldn't exist.
That's because transistors rely on the unique properties of semiconductors -- materials that can act as either a conductor or an insulator -- to operate. Thanks to groundbreaking discoveries in quantum mechanics, Stanford researcher Eugene Wigner and his student, Frederick Seitz, were the first to manipulate the properties of semiconductors in the 1930s. Armed with their research, scientists from Bell Laboratories developed the first rudimentary transistors over the next decade, and by 1954, the United States military had constructed TRIDAC, the first transistor-based computer. Unlike the monstrous, unreliable vacuum-tube computers that preceded it, TRIDAC occupied only 3 cubic feet (0.08 cubic meters) and needed only 100 watts of power to operate [source: PBS]. Today, companies like Intel and AMD fabricate cutting-edge microprocessors containing billions of microprocessors, and we have quantum mechanics to thank.
So I guess if you're going through life believing things like the world is only 6,000 years old, there is no such thing as evolution and that man shared the Earth with dinosaurs then you're likely to accept that Global Warming isn't real. But that's not science. And being unwilling on any actual level to accept the relevance of science(even while communicating through a method which is entirely dependent on modern science) doesn't make a person safe from the consequences of ignoring that science.
Aren't you the first guy to dismiss claims against your beliefs because of the source or if it comes from a blog?