The Official Trump U.S Supreme Court Justice Nomination Thread

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Trump open to changing his mind on Kavanaugh depending on testimony

President Trump said Wednesday he's open to changing his mind about his Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, depending on the testimony he hears from Christine Blasey Ford at the Senate Judiciary Committee about her claim that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982.

At a press conference in New York, Trump said he plans on watching the scheduled Thursday hearing and is open to reviewing his position depending on what is said.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News Brief
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Senate examining fourth potential allegation of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh

The Senate Judiciary Committee is examining another allegation of misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, who has already been accused by three women of sexual misconduct.

The allegation surfaced after Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., received an anonymous complaint detailing that Kavanaugh assaulted someone at a bar in 1998. The sender said her daughter was present when the incident took place, along with several friends.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News Brief
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,502
8,107
113
B.C.
I guess that they were looking for something else ... Is he a traitor? Is he a thief? Is he a gangster?

Maybe, it never occurred to the FBI that he might have been a rapist. Maybe, rapists are so common in those misogynist circles that it didn't even merit a mention.
A rapist ? According to the so called victim she was felt over her sweater and one piece bathing suit . Sounds like a far cry to me . I wonder if he had a Boomer ?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
Remember the Harvey Weinstein case?


The case that is before the courts right now? The one that already took a hit when it was revealed that one of foremost me2 activists is herself a pedophile? That case? Weinstein is more than likely guilty as sin but he deserves his day in court just as all others who stand accused but have yet to see one iota of proof that there was any crime committed.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
NYT: Kavanaugh's New Accuser Recently Told Former Classmates She Still Isn't Sure It Was Him

"In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending...The former friend who was married to the male classmate alleged to be involved, and who signed the statement, said of Ramirez, “This is a woman I was best friends with. We shared intimate details of our lives. And I was never told this story by her, or by anyone else. It never came up. I didn’t see it; I never heard of it happening.” She said she hadn’t spoken with Ramirez for about ten years, but that the two women had been close all through college, and Kavanaugh had remained part of what she called their “larger social circle.”...A third classmate, who Ramirez thought had attended the party, said that she was not present at the incident.

That first bolded sentence is really a stunner. Despite dozens of contacts, the New Yorker couldn't even confirm Kavanaugh was in the room. All of the former students who are quoted backing up Ramirez, the most significant of whom is anonymous, say their knowledge of the supposed incident was secondhand, at best. Those with firsthand knowledge all contradict her, as does her own best friend. But the most devastating paragraph of reportage on this front does not appear in the New Yorker piece; it appears in the New York Times, which was one of several major news outlets who dug into this story and declined to run it.

After quite a lot of shoe leather reporting, including interviews of dozens of people, the Times could not dig up one shred of firsthand corroboration. What they did unearth, however, is the fact that in the process of seeking to crowd-source her memories of an evening from 35 years ago, Ramirez told a number of friends that she still isn't sure Kavanaugh did it. No wonder the Times declined to publish. As I've written in my commentaries about Prof. Ford's accusation, I have no idea what did or did not happen at a high school party in 1982 (if it took place at all); the same applies to a Yale dorm room in 1983. But credible allegations require some semblance of evidence and corroboration. That threshold has not been met here. Not even close.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybe...-classmates-she-isnt-sure-it-was-him-n2521911
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
The case that is before the courts right now? The one that already took a hit when it was revealed that one of foremost me2 activists is herself a pedophile? That case? Weinstein is more than likely guilty as sin but he deserves his day in court just as all others who stand accused but have yet to see one iota of proof that there was any crime committed.
Kavanaugh is also likely guilty as sin.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
Kavanaugh is also likely guilty as sin.

He may very well be, Hoid which doesn't alter the fact that at least one of his accusers has a very loose grip on the truth. Then there is Swetnick who allegedly attended over 10 house parties where she says she witnessed all kinds of depraved behavior.................yet she kept going back time after time after time. And, in spite of all this depravity taking place not one report was ever made. Not a single one.
 

justducky

Electoral Member
Aug 2, 2018
429
0
16
He may very well be, Hoid which doesn't alter the fact that at least one of his accusers has a very loose grip on the truth. Then there is Swetnick who allegedly attended over 10 house parties where she says she witnessed all kinds of depraved behavior.................yet she kept going back time after time after time. And, in spite of all this depravity taking place not one report was ever made. Not a single one.

But an ex girlfriend of Mark Judge says he admitted to her at the time that a girl was passed out and she was raped. So that backs up the claim of the unstable woman.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Robbin WoodYesterday at 15:46









David Brock on NBC: “I used to know Brett Kavanaugh pretty well. And, when I think of Brett now, in the midst of his hearings for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, all I can think of is the old "Aesop's Fables" adage: "A man is known by the company he keeps." And that's why I want to tell any senator who cares about our democracy: Vote no. Twenty years ago, when I was a conservative movement stalwart, I got to know Brett Kavanaugh both professionally and personally. Brett actually makes a cameo appearance in my memoir of my time in the GOP, "Blinded By The Right." I describe him at a party full of zealous young conservatives gathered to watch President Bill Clinton's 1998 State of the Union address — just weeks after the story of his affair with a White House intern had broken. When the TV camera panned to Hillary Clinton, I saw Brett — at the time a key lieutenant of Ken Starr, the independent counsel investigating various Clinton scandals — mouth the word "bitch."
But there's a lot more to know about Kavanaugh than just his Pavlovian response to Hillary's image. Brett and I were part of a close circle of cold, cynical and ambitious hard-right operatives being groomed by GOP elders for much bigger roles in politics, government and media. And it’s those controversial associations that should give members of the Senate and the American public serious pause.
Call it Kavanaugh's cabal: There was his colleague on the Starr investigation, Alex Azar, now the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Mark Paoletta is now chief counsel to Vice President Mike Pence; House anti-Clinton gumshoe Barbara Comstock is now a Republican member of Congress. Future Fox News personalities Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson were there with Ann Coulter, now a best-selling author, and internet provocateur Matt Drudge.
At one time or another, each of them partied at my Georgetown townhouse amid much booze and a thick air of cigar smoke. In a rough division of labor, Kavanaugh played the role of lawyer — one of the sharp young minds recruited by the Federalist Society to infiltrate the federal judiciary with true believers. Through that network, Kavanaugh was mentored by D.C. Appeals Court Judge Laurence Silberman, known among his colleagues for planting leaks in the press for partisan advantage.
When, as I came to know, Kavanaugh took on the role of designated leaker to the press of sensitive information from Starr's operation, we all laughed that Larry had taught him well. (Of course, that sort of political opportunism by a prosecutor is at best unethical, if not illegal.)
Another compatriot was George Conway (now Kellyanne's husband), who led a secretive group of right-wing lawyers — we called them "the elves" — who worked behind the scenes directing the litigation team of Paula Jones, who had sued Clinton for sexual harassment. I knew then that information was flowing quietly from the Jones team via Conway to Starr's office — and also that Conway's go-to man was none other than Brett Kavanaugh.
That critical flow of inside information allowed Starr, in effect, to set a perjury trap for Clinton, laying the foundation for a crazed national political crisis and an unjust impeachment over a consensual affair.
But the cabal's godfather was Ted Olson, the then-future solicitor general for George W. Bush and now a sainted figure of the GOP establishment (and of some liberals for his role in legalizing same-sex marriage). Olson had a largely hidden role as a consigliere to the "Arkansas Project" — a multi-million dollar dirt-digging operation on the Clintons, funded by the eccentric right-wing billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife and run through The American Spectator magazine, where I worked at the time.
Both Ted and Brett had what one could only be called an unhealthy obsession with the Clintons — especially Hillary. While Ted was pushing through the Arkansas Project conspiracy theories claiming that Clinton White House lawyer and Hillary friend Vincent Foster was murdered (he committed suicide), Brett was costing taxpayers millions by peddling the same garbage at Starr's office.
A detailed analysis of Kavanaugh's own notes from the Starr Investigation reveals he was cherry-picking random bits of information from the Starr investigation — as well as the multiple previous investigations — attempting vainly to legitimize wild right-wing conspiracies. For years he chased down each one of them without regard to the emotional cost to Foster’s family and friends, or even common decency.
Kavanaugh was not a dispassionate finder of fact but rather an engineer of a political smear campaign. And after decades of that, he expects people to believe he's changed his stripes.
Like millions of Americans this week, I tuned into Kavanaugh's hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee with great interest. In his opening statement and subsequent testimony, Kavanaugh presented himself as a "neutral and impartial arbiter" of the law. Judges, he said, were not players but akin to umpires — objectively calling balls and strikes. Again and again, he stressed his "independence" from partisan political influences.
But I don't need to see any documents to tell you who Kavanaugh is — because I've known him for years. And I'll leave it to all the lawyers to parse Kavanaugh's views on everything from privacy rights to gun rights.
But I can promise you that any pretense of simply being a fair arbiter of the constitutionality of any policy regardless of politics is simply a pretense. He made up his mind nearly a generation ago — and, if he's confirmed, he'll have nearly two generations to impose it upon the rest of us."