Muslims will put a end to this institutional craziness
Give Muslims one generation and they will fix our dysfunctional society.
The only thing muslims need do is be patient and we will collapse under our own stupidity sometime soon.
The new institutionalized racism
- Thread starter spaminator
- Start date
Muslims will put a end to this institutional craziness
Give Muslims one generation and they will fix our dysfunctional society.
The only thing muslims need do is be patient and we will collapse under our own stupidity sometime soon.
Maybe, but if you really want to get things moving along for them, get out there with a machete or similar and start severing some heads.
No need. The west will self destroy itself.. Muslims need only stay calm, and populate at their regular rate.
Who gives a $hit. All yoi got to do is pretend
Nature has a way of fixing itself
Too afraid he might lose his fake disability. Nearly 50 years of scamming but we need him as our slave to pay mortgages by proxy in buttf-ck nowhere for capitalists who own bars, hotels and gas stations so we have a place to stop and buy gas, eat, sleep as we drive through the boonies.
Do you have memory loss from too much dope ya racist prick?
And were Irish or Catholics banned from Britain? No, they weren't. So, nice try.
I hope they're still teaching them that overgeneralizing is an error, as so many on this board demonstrate daily.
I suggest that those of you reeling in disgust from "universities" systematically exclude from your life anything that was invented, designed, or organized by anybody with a degree. Moving to Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, would be a good start on a university-free lifestyle.
Oh ho- good luck with that one! Getting a govt union job is like becoming royalty! One must have the blood lines-father or mother in the union-for the good jobs or a close relative for the crappy jobs like at the sewage treatment plant! Union people are now selected for their political views! We cannot have such fine jobs being handed out to just anybody....how will LIE-berals buy enough votes to cling to power if there is no political selection process involved?
LIE-beral policy is in disgrace everywhere and they are desperate to silence all opponents and limit debate!
Hee is an article illustrating the growing unease of Cdns with regard to LIE-beral lust fo power at any price. With some comments of my own in brackets):
Parents have concerns about religion in schools
By Farzana Hassan, Toronto Sun. First posted: Thursday, May 04, 2017 06:14 PM EDT | Updated: Thursday, May 04, 2017 06:18 PM EDT
I recently met with a group of parents concerned about the blurring of lines between religion and state in public education.
They are primarily concerned about what they see as the violation of the principle of neutrality toward all religions in Canada’s public schools. They also believe that current religious issues take classroom time and may disrupt social harmony in schools.
(Oh that`s rich- current religious issues- meaning endless Muslim demands- are disrupting social harmony across the western world-not just here in Ontari-owe!)
The parents fear that if they raise their voices their children will suffer a backlash in the playground: that they will be classified as racist just for raising concerns about religious practices during school hours on school property.
(This potential backlash is a serious threat considering how ineffective schools are at countering bullying! Some years back I saw a media interview with our education minister who informed us :” that LIE-beral research indicates that the great majority of kids feel safe in our school system”! When the 3 teen males I was watching tv with- teens attending one of the `best` public schools in the province- finished howling with scornful laughter, they agreed the minister must have talked only with the student body president and nobody else! And this was some years BEFORE the Muslim accommodation issue appeared!)
Some Muslim Student Association clubs, for example, discuss what is haram lifestyle and may openly disapprove of keeping dogs as pets, or dressing and eating in ways other families may consider normal.
They say that some children are questioning the lifestyle of any peers not subscribing to their religion, and that some children are even coerced to attend MSAs. If true, this does not foster the inclusive and respectful behavior which is a core value that school boards across Canada swear to uphold.
(Parents have always striven to instill religious values in their children- my onw parents certainly compelled me to attend church. The problem Cdns have with Muslims is first- they disdain all other religions as inferior, they retain a 16th century view that any who refuse to join them must be punished, they hold a view of women that is incompatible with most of our laws, and they demand the time to teach their kids these things on school time and in our public buildings! They expect that our long held view that public schools should be secular will be waived forever- just for them- to make it easier for them to establish Islam as the dominant Cdn religion! Muslim religious tolerance is very definitely a ONE WAY STREET!)
Naturally, the dress issue comes down to decency. How does a discussion at a religious club about women needing to dress "modestly" then play out for club members when they see other girls wearing low necklines and hot pants? Perhaps there is a subconscious bias towards those girls simply for what they choose to wear.
(Yes, those ill dressed Cdn sluts are corrupting Muslim girls who find they don’t like being officially considered second class citizens! Best for Muslims to force US to change- with LIE-beral aid!)
The concerned parents asked many questions. Has any procedure been established for any students negatively affected to voice their concern? What does supervising of religious clubs entail? How can a religious club be treated the same as a science club or a cooking club when, as the parents see it, religious groups may listen to sermons which can radicalize a susceptible minority?
(Any Cdn may voice a concern about our school but of course some of us have complaints that LIE-berals do not recognize as valid as they might hamper LIE-beral efforts to BUY Muslim votes!)
(And who will decide if the sermon and values being preached are radical? With our LIE-beral senators already fully documented as systematically ignoring radical Muslim views! LIE-berals have decreed that any complaint leveled at Muslims over radical views is irrational-hence the LIE-beral insistence that Islamophobia is nothing but bigotry- to be stamped out for the benefit of LIE-berals!)
Parent concern is particularly acute at one school board in Ontario, Peel District, that has multiple schools offering congregational services. The PDSB’s story has been well documented in the media.
The PDSB spends considerable money and effort on accommodating religious practices, such as in reviewing the request for space, ensuring a room is available and providing a supervisor.
A similar effort on the math competence of a broad range of PDSB students, for example, may yield more tangible benefits by boosting the average math scores of PDSB students, which languish below the Canadian average.
Such mainstream educational issues are real concerns for parents who do not subscribe to the culture that is developing in some school districts in Canada. The parents I spoke with said that the board in question heard their concerns but said it was legally required to provide faith accommodations.
That is a questionable claim, as congregational prayers can simply be offered during after school hours.
The Peel District School Board must at least listen carefully to the sincere concerns of parents and not dismiss them as racist or xenophobic.
(To bad school trustees with their LIE-beral orientation and lust for power are more interested in buying Muslim votes than in keeping peace and order in our schools!)
In a related matter the question is asked: Why have blasphemy laws at all?
Farzana Hassan tells us this: Beware if you are a dissident of any sort in sharia-infested, mullah-controlled Pakistan. You can be jailed, beaten, stabbed or lynched if you do not endorse the state religion. You can be murdered for anything less than wholehearted endorsement of majority beliefs.
(I ask: WHY should we want to import such violently intolerant people as Pakistani Muslims into Canada? Are LIE-berals that afraid of the views and values of ordinary Cdns and so hungry for power at any price that LIE-berals are prepared to see violence in our streets just so long as they cling to power? Apparently the answer is yes-LIE-berals ARE that selfish!)
Talk about going backwards, schools have become increasingly segregated for several years:
GAO study: Segregation worsening in U.S. schools
America’s public schools – 62 years after the Supreme Court's historic Brown v. Board of Education decision – are increasingly segregated by race and class, according to new findings by Congress’ watchdog agency that echo what advocates for low-income and minority students have said for years.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigators found that from the 2000-2001 to the 2013-2014 school year, both the percentage of K-12 public schools in high-poverty and the percentage comprised of mostly African-American or Hispanic students grew significantly, more than doubling, from 7,009 schools to 15,089 schools. The percentage of all schools with so-called racial or socio-economic isolation grew from 9% to 16%.
Researchers define "isolated schools" as those in which 75% or more of students are of the same race or class.
Such schools, investigators found, offered disproportionately fewer math, science and college-prep courses and had higher rates of students who
were held back in ninth grade, suspended or expelled.
What’s more, GAO investigators found, public charter schools, a key strategy in improving education for such students, may take minority and poor students from larger more diverse public schools and enroll them into less diverse schools.
Overall, investigators found, Hispanic students tended to be “triple segregated” by race, economics and language.
The report, requested by Congress in 2014, on the 60th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision that struck down the 'separate but equal' laws that segregated schools, was released on Tuesday, on its 62nd anniversary.
U.S. Rep. John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat and one of two lawmakers who requested the study, said it “confirms what has long been feared and proves that current barriers against educational equality are eerily similar to those fought during the civil rights movement. There simply can be no excuse for allowing educational apartheid in the 21st century.”
U.S. Education Secretary John King said on Tuesday that the nation’s schools “have made a lot of progress in providing educational equity and opportunity for all students,” with record high graduation rates and lower dropout rates for African-American and Latino. “But we still have a long way to go.”
King added, “Six decades after Brown v. Board, we have failed to close opportunity and achievement gaps for our African-American and Latino students at every level of education. And in far too many schools, we continue to offer them less — less access to the best teachers and the most challenging courses; less access to the services and supports that affluent students often take for granted, and less access to what it takes to succeed academically.”
The segregation findings are not new to civil rights advocates, who for years have complained that U.S. schools are splintered by race and class. The Civil Rights Project at UCLA just this week reported that even as the number of minority students in U.S. public schools has grown over the past three decades, diversity has taken a hit in many schools. It noted that the percentage of “hyper-segregated schools, in which 90% or more of students are minorities, grew since 1988 from 5.7% to 18.4%.
GAO investigators recommended that the U.S. Department of Education analyze the civil rights data it collects to “further explore and understand issues and patterns of disparities.”
In a letter responding to the findings, Catherine E. Lhamon, the department's assistant secretary for civil rights, said it already does this, “both internally and for external consumption.” Lhamon said the report had prompted the department to consider whether it could do more analysis of the data.
But Deputy Assistant Attorney General Eve L. Hill said GAO’s recommendation that the U.S. Department of Justice “systematically track” key information in desegregation cases was “premised on an erroneous understanding” of its civil rights division. Hill said the report “reflects a lack of understanding” about the division’s document management procedures. “The Department carefully monitors each open desegregation case to which the United States is a party on a case-by-case basis, recognizing that each case is unique,” she wrote. “The Department believes its procedures for tracking case-related data is adequate.”
Hill also said the Supreme Court has held that a school with one race or virtually one race within a district “is not, in and of itself, the mark of a system that still practices segregation by law.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/05/17/gao-study-segregation-worsening-us-schools/84508438/
GAO study: Segregation worsening in U.S. schools
America’s public schools – 62 years after the Supreme Court's historic Brown v. Board of Education decision – are increasingly segregated by race and class, according to new findings by Congress’ watchdog agency that echo what advocates for low-income and minority students have said for years.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigators found that from the 2000-2001 to the 2013-2014 school year, both the percentage of K-12 public schools in high-poverty and the percentage comprised of mostly African-American or Hispanic students grew significantly, more than doubling, from 7,009 schools to 15,089 schools. The percentage of all schools with so-called racial or socio-economic isolation grew from 9% to 16%.
Researchers define "isolated schools" as those in which 75% or more of students are of the same race or class.
Such schools, investigators found, offered disproportionately fewer math, science and college-prep courses and had higher rates of students who
were held back in ninth grade, suspended or expelled.
What’s more, GAO investigators found, public charter schools, a key strategy in improving education for such students, may take minority and poor students from larger more diverse public schools and enroll them into less diverse schools.
Overall, investigators found, Hispanic students tended to be “triple segregated” by race, economics and language.
The report, requested by Congress in 2014, on the 60th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision that struck down the 'separate but equal' laws that segregated schools, was released on Tuesday, on its 62nd anniversary.
U.S. Rep. John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat and one of two lawmakers who requested the study, said it “confirms what has long been feared and proves that current barriers against educational equality are eerily similar to those fought during the civil rights movement. There simply can be no excuse for allowing educational apartheid in the 21st century.”
U.S. Education Secretary John King said on Tuesday that the nation’s schools “have made a lot of progress in providing educational equity and opportunity for all students,” with record high graduation rates and lower dropout rates for African-American and Latino. “But we still have a long way to go.”
King added, “Six decades after Brown v. Board, we have failed to close opportunity and achievement gaps for our African-American and Latino students at every level of education. And in far too many schools, we continue to offer them less — less access to the best teachers and the most challenging courses; less access to the services and supports that affluent students often take for granted, and less access to what it takes to succeed academically.”
The segregation findings are not new to civil rights advocates, who for years have complained that U.S. schools are splintered by race and class. The Civil Rights Project at UCLA just this week reported that even as the number of minority students in U.S. public schools has grown over the past three decades, diversity has taken a hit in many schools. It noted that the percentage of “hyper-segregated schools, in which 90% or more of students are minorities, grew since 1988 from 5.7% to 18.4%.
GAO investigators recommended that the U.S. Department of Education analyze the civil rights data it collects to “further explore and understand issues and patterns of disparities.”
In a letter responding to the findings, Catherine E. Lhamon, the department's assistant secretary for civil rights, said it already does this, “both internally and for external consumption.” Lhamon said the report had prompted the department to consider whether it could do more analysis of the data.
But Deputy Assistant Attorney General Eve L. Hill said GAO’s recommendation that the U.S. Department of Justice “systematically track” key information in desegregation cases was “premised on an erroneous understanding” of its civil rights division. Hill said the report “reflects a lack of understanding” about the division’s document management procedures. “The Department carefully monitors each open desegregation case to which the United States is a party on a case-by-case basis, recognizing that each case is unique,” she wrote. “The Department believes its procedures for tracking case-related data is adequate.”
Hill also said the Supreme Court has held that a school with one race or virtually one race within a district “is not, in and of itself, the mark of a system that still practices segregation by law.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/05/17/gao-study-segregation-worsening-us-schools/84508438/
Edumacation is designed to dumb down the sheeple so they will accept their rulers without question. Can't have a population capable of critical thinking. Universities are the ultimate in brainwashing institutions. Just look at what all those "degrees" have done to our forests, wildlife, fisheries, agriculture, etc. Stupid is absolutely necessary to build a mindless consumer culture. The classic example of the moronic outcome is portrayed in the election of a reality TV star to the highest office in the most mindless consumer culture of them all - the Dumpster.
"Why does fortune smile on some
and let the rest go free?" - Don Henley, the Eagles.
"Why does fortune smile on some
and let the rest go free?" - Don Henley, the Eagles.
Yes Cliffy it's all true.
Let me be your Capstone mentor.
Come play with us Cliffy....forever and ever and ever...
Let me be your Capstone mentor.
Come play with us Cliffy....forever and ever and ever...
