True enough, just don't get within 100 miles of your borders without your papers, especially in Arizona.
Nothing like a little embellishment to prop up a claim based entirely on emotion and little on fact.
True enough, just don't get within 100 miles of your borders without your papers, especially in Arizona.
You are here ES. You are not a the nation previously and incorrectly known as America.
As Petros has introduced the pertinent documents outlining Americas final disposal I hardly imagine that you have as yet digested the full implications of said document. I suppose that us dumb Canadians probably ain't got any better deal, we just won't make the same splash when we hit the wall at the end. We have a Queen.
I really don't understand your need to go out of your way to prove me right.Cliffy, YOU may be confined by walls, you certainly appear to be. You are so bound up in your hatred and despair that you limit yourself severely. You see the confines that YOU have built for yourself, and in your paranoia, you project those walls onto everyone else.
Very well written Old Medic, some just do not realize the psychological barriers they have put themselves behind.Cliffy, YOU may be confined by walls, you certainly appear to be. You are so bound up in your hatred and despair that you limit yourself severely. You see the confines that YOU have built for yourself, and in your paranoia, you project those walls onto everyone else.
As to darkbeaver, he shows signs of true paranoia. I hate to tell you db, but the United States of America is here, it is still pretty darn healthy, and it is not going anywhere.
Petros sounds like another paranoid fool.
If you truly support the Bloc, and its ambitions, then you are a fool. The quickest way to make absolutely certain that Quebec becomes totally and permanently irrelevant in this world would be for it to go independent.
Just how much influence has France had in this world since the 1870's? The answer is absolutely none. Quebec would be even less well off. Sadly, those of the French ancestral philosophy have a horrible tendency to believe that France and the French are the epitomy of what the world should be. They simply can't see that French culture, influence, etc. essentially died out about 1910.
Quebec has beautiful landscapes, much in the way of natural resources, and damn little else to offer the world. Were it to become an independent country, it would be totally walled in by a state that despised it for what it had done. It would quickly wither, losing its industry and most of it's productive people.
Just putting on you avatar that you support the Bloc shows how out of touch with reality you really are.
More on topic with the OP.
A US liberal's dream would be if, after November, the Democrats in the Senate have limited their predicted losses to 2-3 seats, giving them about a 55-seat majority. But at the same time, have Joe Sestak and Bill Halter each win and take the Pennsylvania and Arkansas seats to the left. Then, have Harry Reid lose his Nevada seat and get replaced as Senate Majority Leader by a doctrinaire liberal like Tom Harkin or Russ Feingold.
And then, over in the House of Representatives, all the centrist Blue Dog Democrats lose, leaving behind a liberal majority that are loyal to Nancy Pelosi. One that she can whip more easily.
In this scenario, the 2010 elections will make the Congress more left-wing.
It's easier to be the opposition than to be the governing party.
With that said, I'm not sure the Republican Party is revived.
RNC chairman Michael Steele is a little bit of a laughing stock;
House Republican Leader John Boehner throws an embarrassing fit (I mean, like crying and exaggerrating) every time he's on the losing side of a vote;
and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell could be challenged as the leader from within his own caucus.
Even new Republican leaders, like Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown, is upsetting conservatives by voting with the Democrats on the Wall Street reform bill.
Am I to take it that every part of the GOP, except the leaders of the GOP, is revived?
I truly am amused by the virtually total ignorance of some of the folks on this forum. Things like the Airizona law for example. It restricts no one, it does not prohibit anyone from doing anything and in no possible way does it restrict anyone's rights.
In actual fact, its wording is taken DIRECTLY from the Federal laws on the subject.
True enough, just don't get within 100 miles of your borders without your papers, especially in Arizona.
The US has lots of Queens too.You are here ES. You are not a the nation previously and incorrectly known as America. As Petros has introduced the pertinent documents outlining Americas final disposal I hardly imagine that you have as yet digested the full implications of said document. I suppose that us dumb Canadians probably ain't got any better deal, we just won't make the same splash when we hit the wall at the end. We have a Queen.
More on topic with the OP.
A US liberal's dream would be if, after November, the Democrats in the Senate have limited their predicted losses to 2-3 seats, giving them about a 55-seat majority. But at the same time, have Joe Sestak and Bill Halter each win and take the Pennsylvania and Arkansas seats to the left. Then, have Harry Reid lose his Nevada seat and get replaced as Senate Majority Leader by a doctrinaire liberal like Tom Harkin or Russ Feingold.
And then, over in the House of Representatives, all the centrist Blue Dog Democrats lose, leaving behind a liberal majority that are loyal to Nancy Pelosi. One that she can whip more easily.
In this scenario, the 2010 elections will make the Congress more left-wing.
One can only hope! Perhaps they will eventually take all their war toys and go home.Left wing in the states would probably still be considered fairly far right in Canada.
The US with its massive debt will soon have all the relevance of Greece.
Let's review. You said the Republican Party is experiencing a revivial. With leaders like this, I have to ask: a revival of what?
The US with its massive debt will soon have all the relevance of Greece.
More on topic with the OP.
A US liberal's dream would be if, after November, the Democrats in the Senate have limited their predicted losses to 2-3 seats, giving them about a 55-seat majority. But at the same time, have Joe Sestak and Bill Halter each win and take the Pennsylvania and Arkansas seats to the left. Then, have Harry Reid lose his Nevada seat and get replaced as Senate Majority Leader by a doctrinaire liberal like Tom Harkin or Russ Feingold.
And then, over in the House of Representatives, all the centrist Blue Dog Democrats lose, leaving behind a liberal majority that are loyal to Nancy Pelosi. One that she can whip more easily.
In this scenario, the 2010 elections will make the Congress more left-wing.
I'm still waiting for an answer to this by Eagle? The GOP is having a revival, with leaders like Michael Steele? Really?