The Gas Chamber Lie Won't Fly

[Cliffy]

Yes, thousands, perhaps tens of thousands were murdered, enslaved, worked to death, slaughtered in wars......all true.

Colpy,
Nice bit of revisionism and white washing of history? Millions were slaughtered, died on forced marches, herded into appalling concentration camps where it was known they would die of disease and hunger. Millions of buffalo were slaughtered to destroy their food supply, so they could be forced onto land whitey didn't think he would ever want. In exchange for the land they were promised food and blankets. They were given rancid flour and lard and disease infected blankets from sanitariums. The entire history of the Americas has been one of slaughter. Many died of disease but much of that was intentional. Your view of history is incredibly slanted and biased by selective reading. And you talk about holocaust deniers.

 

[petros]

Canada
In Canada, the eugenics movement took place early in the 20th century, particularly in Alberta, and was quite popular. The Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta was enacted in 1928, focusing the movement on the sterilization of mentally deficient individuals, as determined by the Alberta Eugenics Board. The campaign to enforce this action was backed by groups such as the United Farm Women's Group, including key member Emily Murphy.[84]
Individuals were assessed using IQ tests like the Stanford-Binet. This posed a problem to new immigrants arriving in Canada, as many had not mastered the English language, and often their scores denoted them as having impaired intellectual functioning. As a result, many of those sterilized under the Sexual Sterilization Act were immigrants who were unfairly categorized.[85]
The popularity of the eugenics movement peaked during the Depression. Individuals sought an explanation for the financial problems of the nation, and the notion of defective breeding became a scapegoat; citizens blamed individuals considered to be subhuman. The end of the Canadian eugenics movement was brought about when the Sexual Sterilization Act was repealed in 1972

Wow. Canadian eugenics laws were only repealed in 1972? Holy ****!

I can see that. 72 was about the peak of pollution and onslaught of provable food additives being toxic so no problems worrying about the poor or handicapped eating your good that you can afford.

Wasn't it nice to have NAFTA yank those bans so I have the "freedom" to chose anaphylactic shock from Cap N' Crunch Berries. Too bad so many kids will have to learn the hard way or die eating a Canadian govt approved breakfast food it once banned because it killed.

 

[darkbeaver]

Sometimes hundreds of redmen would be herded into heaped brush piles and burned alive dogs were set on pregnant women and children were skewered on pikes and thousands upon thousands of villages were razed to the ground with all living things. This and worse went on for four hundred years and still it isn't over.

 

[CDNBear]

So are we.

Ya, how would you be able to get along having someone punch huge holes in your stupidity all 24/7/52.

 

[Colpy]

Yes, thousands, perhaps tens of thousands were murdered, enslaved, worked to death, slaughtered in wars......all true.

Colpy,
Nice bit of revisionism and white washing of history? Millions were slaughtered, died on forced marches, herded into appalling concentration camps where it was known they would die of disease and hunger. Millions of buffalo were slaughtered to destroy their food supply, so they could be forced onto land whitey didn't think he would ever want. In exchange for the land they were promised food and blankets. They were given rancid flour and lard and disease infected blankets from sanitariums. The entire history of the Americas has been one of slaughter. Many died of disease but much of that was intentional. Your view of history is incredibly slanted and biased by selective reading. And you talk about holocaust deniers.

"Millions" ?????!!!!!

Baloney.

I actually have a degree in history.........and I never denied that there was enslavement, murder, and robbery practised on a large scale against native Americans........

But "millions" is hocus-pocus.

And much of the murder was warfare, conducted without mercy on both sides.

The natives of America practised war, murder, torture, cannibalism, and mass human sacrifice long before the arrival of the white man.

I don't buy into the guilt thing.

 

[darkbeaver]

Ya, how would you be able to get along having someone punch huge holes in your stupidity all 24/7/52.

Don't know, but its got to be better than getting along pre-punched like you.:smile:

 

[petros]

The natives of America practised war, murder, torture, cannibalism, and mass human sacrifice long before the arrival of the white man.

With rifle and sabre against stone? history degree? BULLS hIT

 

[Colpy]

With rifle and sabre against stone? history degree? BULLS hIT

You don't read very well, do you???

Try again.......what I said was

"The natives of America practised war, murder, torture, cannibalism, and mass human sacrifice long before the arrival of the white man."

Perhaps you could explain what "rifle and sabre" have to do with history before the arrival of the White Man?

The Aztecs participated in contests known as "Wars of the Flower" in which the object was to collect as many prisoners as possible. These were used as human sacrifice, sometimes in astounding numbers. In one instance, in 1486, there were an estimated 20,000 young men sacrificed in a single festival of mass murder that lasted 4 days. They also sacrificed women and children on extra special occassions.......but most of the murdered were young men.

In university I did a project on the alleged "genocide" of the Beothuks of Newfoundland........what a joke! It turns out that yes, the Beothuk may have succumbed to genocide at the end....perpetrated on them by the Mic Macs.......after the Beothuk population was decimated by disease and misfortune......


Perhaps you should be a little more careful in your accusations.....the study of history has been one of the focal points of my interest....and you, obviously, don't have a clue what you are talking about....

BTW, rifles did not become popular until the latter part of the 1700s, and they did not become dominant in warfare until the Civil War of 1860 to 1865. I'll explain why, if you are interested.......

 

[CDNBear]

BTW, rifles did not become popular until the latter part of the 1700s, and they did not become dominant in warfare until the Civil War of 1860 to 1865. I'll explain why, if you are interested.......

If this has anything to do with real fact and documented history, he has no interest at all.

As seen in his and DB's posts...;-)

 

[darkbeaver]

:bunny:

You don't read very well, do you???

Try again.......what I said was

"The natives of America practised war, murder, torture, cannibalism, and mass human sacrifice long before the arrival of the white man."

Perhaps you could explain what "rifle and sabre" have to do with history before the arrival of the White Man?

The Aztecs participated in contests known as "Wars of the Flower" in which the object was to collect as many prisoners as possible. These were used as human sacrifice, sometimes in astounding numbers. In one instance, in 1486, there were an estimated 20,000 young men sacrificed in a single festival of mass murder that lasted 4 days. They also sacrificed women and children on extra special occassions.......but most of the murdered were young men.

In university I did a project on the alleged "genocide" of the Beothuks of Newfoundland........what a joke! It turns out that yes, the Beothuk may have succumbed to genocide at the end....perpetrated on them by the Mic Macs.......after the Beothuk population was decimated by disease and misfortune......


Perhaps you should be a little more careful in your accusations.....the study of history has been one of the focal points of my interest....and you, obviously, don't have a clue what you are talking about....

BTW, rifles did not become popular until the latter part of the 1700s, and they did not become dominant in warfare until the Civil War of 1860 to 1865. I'll explain why, if you are interested.......

I read somewhere today that Enfield introduced rifled barrals arroud then in some article somewhere. Coinkedink for sure. And you exagerated two thousand prisoners for the Aztec blood sacrifice which was done in a very civilized but savage and Alien manner according to agreements, it was eighteen thousand. So what eh.

 

[darkbeaver]

My brain cell and I are retiring for the night.

 

[einmensch]

Only a complete drooling moron would take this seriously.

oh.

Hi Einmensch.

Glad to see that you are taking this seriously.:lol:

 

[einmensch]

Only a complete ass needs to tell others that one has a degree, Colpy, in History no less--- Thanks for your pic -- Now I know what Colpy the braying Ass looks like--

 

[petros]

You don't read very well, do you???

Try again.......what I said was

"The natives of America practised war, murder, torture, cannibalism, and mass human sacrifice long before the arrival of the white man."

Perhaps you could explain what "rifle and sabre" have to do with history before the arrival of the White Man?

The Aztecs participated in contests known as "Wars of the Flower" in which the object was to collect as many prisoners as possible. These were used as human sacrifice, sometimes in astounding numbers. In one instance, in 1486, there were an estimated 20,000 young men sacrificed in a single festival of mass murder that lasted 4 days. They also sacrificed women and children on extra special occassions.......but most of the murdered were young men.

In university I did a project on the alleged "genocide" of the Beothuks of Newfoundland........what a joke! It turns out that yes, the Beothuk may have succumbed to genocide at the end....perpetrated on them by the Mic Macs.......after the Beothuk population was decimated by disease and misfortune......


Perhaps you should be a little more careful in your accusations.....the study of history has been one of the focal points of my interest....and you, obviously, don't have a clue what you are talking about....

BTW, rifles did not become popular until the latter part of the 1700s, and they did not become dominant in warfare until the Civil War of 1860 to 1865. I'll explain why, if you are interested.......

Musket.. rifle... big deal....explain the difference in comparison to chert or obsidian.

With your reasoning of 'they were warring people for blah blah blah years between blah blah tribes blah blah blah", makes ANY race that attacks Caucasians fully justified in genocide of Caucasians...