The Donroe Doctrine

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
I bet you and your drivers wish you could find backhaul even at a discount .
That doesn’t fit the economic model generally. Backhauls work when they are along the beaten path that you want to be on without diverging you dramatically off the route you need to be on.

Generally, most manufacturing for the things that we haul is One Direction from the US to Canada, and we’re highly specialized to do what we do. We have discovered that it makes more economic sense for us to run down, empty and come back loaded, unless it’s something that we can carry with the equipment that we have and we don’t have to diverge too far off the beaten path that we follow generally from Northwest Indiana to dealerships across Western Canada.

Working within the hours of service (HOS) rules, and Cabatage rules (no state to state deliveries for Canadians), there’s a finite amount of time behind the wheel before Driver has to stop for a minimum of 36 hours to reset his logbook (or try to run on recap hours, which are a pain in the ass), every load that we pick up in the US has to cross one international border (but not two, to keep Canadians from delivering to Alaska).

An American driver could deliver oranges from Florida to Montreal, and if he has a load from Vancouver to California….he can pick up an “incidental load” in Canada to get him from Montreal to Vancouver. It’s just the way things work.
You won find any in a stagnant economy .
They are rare when the economy isn’t stagnant, because we are highly specialized for what we actually do. Our equipment isn’t designed for general freight.
1788116777787.jpeg
1788116800462.jpeg
1788116823604.jpeg
Trump is nothing new .
Trump is not new, but he is a blatantly extreme example of what you’re trying to describe above.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
(Trumps rape of Venezuelan resources is gonna take a decade before it really produces, but that that’s Heavy crude similar to the oil sands in Canada and the clock is ticking)
U.S. President Donald Trump shared a news article that stated Canada is ‘on notice’ two days after the U.S. inked a “deal” with Venezuela over its oil reserves.
If I was in his (Carney’s) shoes, I would be attempting to twin pipelines and rail lines east to west and coast to coast inside of our own borders as quickly as logistically possible…on top of trying to maintain equitable relations with our largest trading partner while trying to diversify as much as possible, so we’re not dictated our politics from a foreign nation.
In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump shared a news article on the announcement with the headline: “Trump’s historic oil ‘deal’ with Venezuela realigns global energy and puts OPEC, Canada on notice.”
Canada isn’t trying to make Canada greater by invading and/or annexing through military or economic means Cuba or Venezuela or Greenland or America or Mexico or Botswana.
Hmmmm…I wonder what he means by this?:
Ottawa announced nearly $28 billion CAD in Counter-Tariffs on U.S. Goods, but has already left oil, gas, and other major resource exports off the list…so why is Trump stating what he’s stating in the link? What’s that motivation?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
29,352
8,674
113
B.C.
That doesn’t fit the economic model generally. Backhauls work when they are along the beaten path that you want to be on without diverging you dramatically off the route you need to be on.

Generally, most manufacturing for the things that we haul is One Direction from the US to Canada, and we’re highly specialized to do what we do. We have discovered that it makes more economic sense for us to run down, empty and come back loaded, unless it’s something that we can carry with the equipment that we have and we don’t have to diverge too far off the beaten path that we follow generally from Northwest Indiana to dealerships across Western Canada.

Working within the hours of service (HOS) rules, and Cabatage rules (no state to state deliveries for Canadians), there’s a finite amount of time behind the wheel before Driver has to stop for a minimum of 36 hours to reset his logbook (or try to run on recap hours, which are a pain in the ass), every load that we pick up in the US has to cross one international border (but not two, to keep Canadians from delivering to Alaska).

An American driver could deliver oranges from Florida to Montreal, and if he has a load from Vancouver to California….he can pick up an “incidental load” in Canada to get him from Montreal to Vancouver. It’s just the way things work.

They are rare when the economy isn’t stagnant, because we are highly specialized for what we actually do. Our equipment isn’t designed for general freight.
View attachment 35538
View attachment 35539
View attachment 35540

Trump is not new, but he is a blatantly extreme example of what you’re trying to describe above.
Not really , he is just a convienent whipping boy to keep Canadians wound up . Won’t the Canadians proposed tariffs affect your industries volumes ? Sounds like Carney is shooting you in the foot .
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Not really , he is just a convienent whipping boy to keep Canadians wound up . Won’t the Canadians proposed tariffs affect your industries volumes ?
Absolutely! So far they haven’t directly (These are finished vehicles) but it’s coming, I’m assuming, as the input costs for manufacturing (steel, aluminum, etc…) go up for these finish products the prices will go up, and the price of diesel is definitely up, and the repair costs on parts is going up, squeezing from many directions. Then there’s the whole less disposable income for the customers of the dealerships we deliver to, etc…
Sounds like Carney is shooting you in the foot .
Sounds like both Trump and Carney are both shooting us in the foot. One is reacting to the other, and the spill off damage is affecting us all, and will incrementally the longer this stupidity and strong arm coercive tactics continue.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
29,352
8,674
113
B.C.
Absolutely! So far they haven’t directly (These are finished vehicles) but it’s coming, I’m assuming, as the input costs for manufacturing (steel, aluminum, etc…) go up for these finish products the prices will go up, and the price of diesel is definitely up, and the repair costs on parts is going up, squeezing from many directions. Then there’s the whole less disposable income for the customers of the dealerships we deliver to, etc…

Sounds like both Trump and Carney are both shooting us in the foot. One is reacting to the other, and the spill off damage is affecting us all, and will incrementally the longer this stupidity and strong arm coercive tactics continue.
It used to be economical to buy an RV in Washington or California and go through the importing and registration etc. yourself or with a broker . Those of course were used vehicles . I wonder if that market will start back up .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
It used to be economical to buy an RV in Washington or California and go through the importing and registration etc. yourself or with a broker . Those of course were used vehicles . I wonder if that market will start back up .
We do haul these for private Canadian purchasers as well, but when they use a commercial carrier (trucking company), they also have to use a commercial Canadian broker (dems da rules), but it must be economical to some extent still, or it wouldn’t be happening but it’s all from (not to) the U.S. for whatever reason.

Very rarely is it from Canada to the United States with a used RV, due to the strength of their dollar comparatively, though we do see this with the high-end horse trailers (horse/living compartment) that originally come from southern Michigan.

(If a private purchaser buys an RV in the US to ship to Canada, as long as they haul it across the border themselves and are present at the border when the unit crosses, they could do this without a Canadian broker)

The one I’m working on right now as a side deal, the guy bought a destination unit in Minnesota for cheap cheap, but he does not have the drivers license endorsement himself to haul up his own RV, nor is his truck capable of hauling this destination unit.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
29,352
8,674
113
B.C.
We do haul these for private Canadian purchasers as well, but when they use a commercial carrier (trucking company), they also have to use a commercial Canadian broker (dems da rules), but it must be economical to some extent still, or it wouldn’t be happening but it’s all from (not to) the U.S. for whatever reason.

Very rarely is it from Canada to the United States with a used RV, due to the strength of their dollar comparatively, though we do see this with the high-end horse trailers (horse/living compartment) that originally come from southern Michigan.

(If a private purchaser buys an RV in the US to ship to Canada, as long as they haul it across the border themselves and are present at the border when the unit crosses, they could do this without a Canadian broker)

The one I’m working on right now as a side deal, the guy bought a destination unit in Minnesota for cheap cheap, but he does not have the drivers license endorsement himself to haul up his own RV, nor is his truck capable of hauling this destination unit.
Sounds like your help is worth the cost .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
U.S. President Donald Trump shared a news article that stated Canada is ‘on notice’ two days after the U.S. inked a “deal” with Venezuela over its oil reserves.
Rory Johnston, oil market analyst at Toronto-based Commodity Context, said Venezuela has historically faced challenges getting its product to market and called Mr. Trump’s claim that the ‘deal’ will amount to 65 billion barrels coming under U.S. control a “red herring.”
In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump shared a news article on the announcement with the headline: “Trump’s historic oil ‘deal’ with Venezuela realigns global energy and puts OPEC, Canada on notice.
“Despite Venezuela having these massive claimed reserves, they currently produce only about a million barrels a day,” he said. In comparison, Canada produces over 5.3 million barrels of crude oil per day.
Hmmmm…I wonder what he means by this?:
Regardless, for the Canadian crude industry, the effect of the U.S.-Venezuela partnership could eventually be an “incremental” increase in competition with the oil flowing into the U.S.’s Gulf Coast, said Mr. Johnston.
Ottawa announced nearly $28 billion CAD in Counter-Tariffs on U.S. Goods, but has already left oil, gas, and other major resource exports off the list…so why is Trump stating what he’s stating in the link? What’s that motivation?
This shift will likely result in “slightly worse oil prices for Canada, all else equal,” Mr. Johnston said, adding that declines will probably be “in the ballpark of $4 to $5 dollars a barrel.” Canadian crude is similar in quality to Venezuela’s.
Trumps Venezuela ‘deal’ announcement comes nearly nine months after the U.S. military at Mr. Trump’s direction carried out an operation to capture Venezuela’s former leader Nicolás Maduro and spirit him to the United States to face federal narcoterrorism and drug trafficking charges, and installing acting President Delcy Rodríguez in his place.
1788180368587.jpeg
A U.S.-Venezuela oil ‘deal’ has been announced by President Trump and Interim President Delcy Rodríguez. The public knows virtually nothing about the details of the agreement — nor do I, a Special Adviser to Venezuelan Congressman Antonio Ecarri on Economic, Monetary, and Energy Affairs. This deal was clearly arrived at in secrecy, with no public debate, and signed under duress. Therefore, it is illegitimate and probably illegal.
The ‘deal’ would give the U.S. 55% of the new company’s effective output, split between equity ownership and guaranteed at-cost off-take. Who’s paying for this, and what’s the timeline?
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,757
4,253
113
Edmonton
Gotta do something as opposed to outright capitulation. If you were in Carney’s shoes at this point, what would you do? Try to diversify knowing that the results are going to be years down the road (?) or bend over and lube up the entire country?

(Trumps rape of Venezuelan resources is gonna take a decade before it really produces, but that that’s Heavy crude similar to the oil sands in Canada and the clock is ticking)

If I was in his shoes, I would be attempting to twin pipelines and rail lines east to west and coast to coast inside of our own borders as quickly as logistically possible…on top of trying to maintain equitable relations with our largest trading partner while trying to diversify as much as possible, so we’re not dictated our politics from a foreign nation.

Dude is getting to sit in the big chair because he came in on a platform of standing up for Canada (I still would’ve voted for Poilievre), and now it’s time to put up or shut up.
Unfortunately, that goes against his grain & it will never happen. Carney is lying thru his teeth about pipelines but I'll be the first to bite my tongue if any actual pipelines go thru.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
U.S. President Donald Trump has ‌repeatedly sought to acquire the semi-autonomous Danish island, citing national security concerns and accusing Copenhagen of neglecting Arctic defence. Denmark and Greenland have firmly rejected the idea.
The conscripts are taking part in Arctic Endurance, a Danish military exercise that trains soldiers for combat and survival in extreme cold-weather conditions. The drill forms part of Arctic Sentry, a NATO mission launched this year to strengthen the alliance's Arctic presence and ease tensions within NATO ⁠after Trump's remarks about Greenland.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
US President Donald Trump imposed up to 100% tariffs on drones, targeting Chinese-made models in particular over national security concerns. China’s DJI alone accounts for more than 70% of the global market, and US law enforcement uses its devices to track wildfires and find missing persons. But drones are also increasingly vital for military purposes: Regulators effectively barred the sale of new models in December over national security concerns.

Washington is keen to build domestic manufacturing — it has similarly banned foreign-made mobile robots to combat Chinese dominance — but is far behind. One drone user called the ban “industry-killing.” Trump’s family has skin in the game: His sons have financial ties to US drone makers, The New York Times noted.
1788441644164.jpeg
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,925
11,831
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
(YouTube & Trump’s 100-Year Plan for Venezuela’s Oil | The Palki Sharma Show)
1788479175795.jpeg
President Trump’s oil deal with Venezuela does not legally ban Venezuela from refining its own oil, but the agreement focuses entirely on extracting and exporting crude oil through a U.S.-backed private venture to supply external markets.
Terms of the Agreement
  • Sovereignty: Interim Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez stated that Venezuela officially retains ownership and sovereignty over its natural resources?
    Concessions: The deal grants 100-year operating rights for 17 oil fields to North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP), a private company.
    U.S. Stake: The U.S. Pentagon holds a 35% equity stake in the venture and secures the right to buy 20% of the oil output at production cost so without profit.
The Reality of Refining
  • Export Focus: The primary goal of the arrangement is to extract heavy crude oil and ship it to external refineries, particularly in the United States, to replenish the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and lower fuel costs.
    Infrastructure Decay: Decades of neglect have left Venezuela’s local refining infrastructure [PDVSA] in a state of severe disrepair, meaning the country currently lacks the operational capacity to refine much of its own oil effectively.

    The U.S. State Department secures the right of first refusal to buy the remaining 80% of the oil output, and any portion not claimed by the U.S. is sold commercially on the open market by North American Blue Energy Partners.

    Handling the Remaining 80%
    Right of First Refusal: The State Department has priority access to purchase or direct😳 the rest of the oil produced by the venture before it goes elsewhere.
    Open Market Sales: If the U.S. government declines to buy a portion of that 80%, the private operating company sells it at market rates.
    Local Revenues: Sales of the remaining oil generate funds that support the agreed-upon tax and royalty payments toward Venezuelan infrastructure.
    1788479511235.jpeg
    The terms of U.S. President Donald Trump's oil deal with Venezuela are highly similar in intent and structure to what his administration demanded from Canada before their trade talks collapsed.

    Both situations reflect a consistent "America First" strategy focused on securing total or preferred access to vital foreign resource chains via ownership stakes, board control, and purchase mandates.
Delcy Rodríguez was installed as interim president on 5 January, two days after the president, Nicolás Maduro, was abducted by US special forces during a predawn raid on Caracas. Trump warned Rodríguez, who was Maduro’s vice-president, she would face an even worse fate if she did not toe the US line.

We are very happy with the president-elect (?) that we have right now, the people that are running it," Trump said on Tuesday. (Rodriguez has not, in fact, been elected to the post.)

Since Maduro’s capture, Rodríguez has made a series of once unthinkable concessions to US officials who their nominally socialist political movement, Chavismo, had spent years denouncing as predatory imperialists bent on stealing Venezuela’s natural resources.🤔

Neither U.S. President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's social media posts, nor a White House statement, nor Rodriguez's speech clarified exactly how or when 17 Venezuelan oilfields would be rejuvenated and start producing the 65 billion barrels covered by Trump's "biggest oil deal ever."🙄

Under the current terms of the historic U.S.-Venezuela oil deal orchestrated by the Trump administration, the domestic Venezuelan oil refining industry will not benefit in any meaningful capacity, as the agreement is fundamentally designed for extraction to supply U.S. refineries, for at least the next four generations of the Venezuelan population.
During intense trade talks, the Trump administration pushed for a blanket Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and exclusive access over Canada's highly coveted critical minerals and rare earth elements (including lithium, nickel, cobalt, and graphite).

This is structurally identical to the historic ‘deal’ Washington imposed on Venezuela following the capture of Nicolás Maduro. In Venezuela, the U.S. seized control of the country’s vast oil reserves by granting long-term concessions to a private operator, locking in a right of first refusal on crude production and securing veto power over board appointments…for the next 100 years.

Economic and mining experts noted that giving the U.S. a ROFR on Canadian soil was a "non-starter" and completely unworkable. It would have legally transformed sovereign Canadian territory into a de facto extraction zone for the Pentagon, allowing Washington to unilaterally veto or divert mineral sales already under contract with other global allies.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
29,352
8,674
113
B.C.
Amazing we have all these details on a Venezuelan deal but have none on the one Carney walked away from .