Where the "thickness" lies is in people who totally believe everything the vast majority of media, who incidentally, show partial clips that totally misrepresent what is said and then the DNC repeating and, of course vice versa. They don't apologize when they're wrong and some are even sued for blatant lying and misinformation.
Just heard a clip of a speech that Joe Biden had and then a speech that JFK had made and they are EXACTLY the same. Joe can't even write a speech?? Apparently this is not unusual for Joe as he has plagiarized speeches previously but you won't hear anything about it on most of the MSM,
At least when Trump was elected everyone knew what they were getting and voted for him anyway likely because he wasn't a politician. I know that Trump is an egotist, a braggadocio etc, but at least he shows his true colors; not like most politicians who spew niceties and make promises and then once elected do sweet dick!! And until there is definitive proof that he's done some illegal things while President, I say that he's doing pretty good. Does that make him a person I would want to know? Highly unlikely but I wouldn't want to know most of the others who oppose him either. They have no integrity and are just as selfish if not more so that Trump.
The bottom line is at least Trump has accomplishments in the 2+ years despite what has been happening and he continues to fight to keep the promises he made during his election campaign. Again, you don't hear any of his accomplishments on the MSM.
You have your thoughts about him, and I have mine and both are legitimate. To name call (which is what the left tend to do) you have just exposed to us that you can't tolerate an opposing view. Just keep with the name calling if it makes you feel good.
JMHO
I actually heard about the plagiarized speech from the media.
Guess they're talking about it after all.
Personally Biden shouldn't be running at all.
That said, you're right, people DID know what they would be getting, likely, if they voted for Trump. That's why his popular vote sucked vs. Clinton.
But election by popular vote isn't how it's done in the US, and now they have Trump.
I doubt, though, that you'd accept any proof (even if he did admit it) that he's done anything illegal, proven or not. The ONLY reason he's not charged with Obstruction is that the people he ordered to do things refused. That's it. He STILL ordered their interference. IMO, that's akin to asking someone to kill a person for you. If the person says no, you STILL get charged with a crime. It should be the same for this.
But the whole fiasco is just that, a fiasco, it's ****ed up and Trump again gets off scott free.
His accomplishments, such as they are, do get reported and are quickly overrun by the f-ups he continues to make on a daily business. That's not on the media per say, but on the man himself.
BTW, the right loves to name call too, with Trump being the HUGEST fan of it.
