Tea Party Protests: 'Ni**er,' 'Fa**ot' Shouted At Members Of Congress

[SirJosephPorter]

Well YJ, even the Tea Party has condemned the behavior of your heroes, the far right yahoos. And this in your icon, FOX news.

FOXNews.com - Tea Party Leader, GOP Condemn Racial Slurs Hurled at Black Lawmakers

So let me get this straight. The behavior has been condemned by Democrats (of course), by Republicans and by at least some Tea Party organizers. The only one who apparently does not have any problem with what the tea party racists said (nigg*r, f*g and more) is you.

This really tells us what you think of blacks, homosexuals and other minorities.

 

[DaSleeper]

SirJosephPorter, a slur is a slur is a slur.

When you call people of faith extremists and rednecks is no worse than anything the liberal plants hurled at Lewis and Franks.

The only difference is that some have self-respect some others have a gigantic chip on the shoulder that even the election of a black (well, half black) President could not remove.

People them (hell, people like you!) won't be satisfied until everyone who disagrees with you are securely silenced and/or incarcerated.

:lol::lol::lol:

 

[catman]

Tea Party Racism
Neo-Confederates
Obama the Witch Doctor

 

[Avro]

What it all comes down to is the basic fact that there is an arsehole.......or six.....in every bunch.

Well said.

You didn't try to deflect, defend or excuse it.

 

[Walter]

I still say they are lying or it's lefty propaganda.

 

[YukonJack]

Not worth quoting garbage, but here is my response to post #21.

So let me get this straight: on one breath (your very own post #10) you claim that FOXNews never even covered this mountain-out-of-a-molehill nonsense, then on the next breath you have the unmitigated nerve to link to FOXNews. This makes you either an unparalled fool or an unmatched hypocrite.

 

[Walter]

Not worth quoting garbage, but here is my response to post #21.

So let me get this straight: on one breath (your very own post #10) you claim that FOXNews never even covered this mountain-out-of-a-molehill nonsense, then on the next breath you have the unmitigated nerve to link to FOXNews. This makes you either an unparalled fool or an unmatched hypocrite.

Put it on ignore; I did ages ago.

 

[YukonJack]

Put him on ignore? And deprive myself the good chuckles? The delicious absurdities? The predictable and laughable repetitions?

Although, I must admit, he caught me by surprise with his link to FOXNews.

I was saving it, but he beat me to it.

 

[DaSleeper]

See post 22...the many faces of SPA the clown and the loudmouth;-)

 

[Curiosity]

Thank you YukonJack

I was surprised at what Sir Joseph wrote - but perhaps he doesn't avail himself of the same offerings of news we have in the U.S. It could be more expanded upon than is seen, read or heard in Canada. Since I moved to the U.S. I confess I don't have the same interest in Canadian politics and what has transpired since I moved.
It's a selfish thing on my part but what affects us personally and our finances does
become an important issue if we aren't included in why we are again asked to build
yet another bureaucratic arm of an inefficient, bulging, money grubbing concept
without representation.

No problem - there are people who truly believe the TeaBaggers are of one party and it may happen they organize into a third party eventually, but it will take years for them to work out the myriad of issues they have with the current socialist leaning government which is now in charge...... comprised of members of both Liberal and Conservative membership. The staggering number of eligible voters - I think 300 million approximately - will take years to blend and find the hot spot to which we can all give or take and accept.

It has been taken from the people and that is the issue - nobody signed on for a dictatorship or a "government knows all" kind of scenario.

The only binding issue for the TeaBaggers is the lack of input and representation offered by the representatives of THE PEOPLE in this current move to oversee the health care - which is just another control of finances (such as Social Security was years ago), finances the people must contribute to without a vote or to be heard in the matter. Maybe it is time for a change - and if that is true, the nobody told the people what was coming.

It scoffs at the Constitution - which has worked for as long as the U.S. has been a nation of the people, represented by those they vote into office as their representatives not their controllers.

 

[Curiosity]

Catman I should have mentioned this earlier when I read your flamer OP

CommonDreams.org (or whatever) is hardly a credible source for validity.....but
it made an exciting shriek to gather attention....hysterically ......as the membership who frequent the place tend to be....

 

[YukonJack]

Curiousity, once again you put your finger on the pulse of America.

It is sad that some people here in Canada hate the U.S. It is even more sad that some other (or perhaps the same) people fancy that they know more about America than Americans. And the saddest thing is that they think that to be a good Canadian one must be a Yankee-hater and be blind to the real or perceived faults on Canada.

There are those in Canada who have succumbed to the siren song of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, New York Times, Washington Post and more recently, with the advent of the Internet age, Huffington Post, DailyKos, Media Matters and the treasoneous bastard who justifies anyone becoming an anti-Semite, the puppet master of all of the above, George Soros.

Please don't demean Tea Party participants as TEA BAGGERS. That epithet is not worthy of you.

 

[ironsides]

quote]

Yes, there are people who are frustrated with the way the U.S. goverment is going, and of course there are those who will never change from their racist views, but "The advise you give does not spring from full knowledge of the situation. You know one half of what is involved, but not the other half. You understand well enough what you think freedom is, but real freedom you have never experienced, so you do not know if it tastes bitter or sweet. If you did come to experience it you would be advising us to fight for it with every means possible."

 

[TenPenny]

Curiousity, once again you put your finger on the pulse of America.

Isn't it amazing that someone who lives in the US might have more insight than polarized know-it-alls who live in Canada?

 

[SirJosephPorter]

Not worth quoting garbage, but here is my response to post #21.

So let me get this straight: on one breath (your very own post #10) you claim that FOXNews never even covered this mountain-out-of-a-molehill nonsense, then on the next breath you have the unmitigated nerve to link to FOXNews. This makes you either an unparalled fool or an unmatched hypocrite.

You are changing the subject again; you have run out of arguments. In case you forgot, we were discussing the racist and homophobic behavior of Tea Party members.

And once again I summarize. The behavior has been condemned by Democrats, by Republicans, and by at least one Tea Party organizer. So far all we have seen from you is tacit approval of such behavior. Instead of addressing the racist and homophobic behavior of your darlings, the tea baggers, you will talk of anything else under the sun.

But that really tells me that you have nothing to say in the matter.

 

[SirJosephPorter]

Thank you YukonJack

I was surprised at what Sir Joseph wrote - but perhaps he doesn't avail himself of the same offerings of news we have in the U.S. It could be more expanded upon than is seen, read or heard in Canada. Since I moved to the U.S. I confess I don't have the same interest in Canadian politics and what has transpired since I moved.
It's a selfish thing on my part but what affects us personally and our finances does
become an important issue if we aren't included in why we are again asked to build
yet another bureaucratic arm of an inefficient, bulging, money grubbing concept
without representation.

No problem - there are people who truly believe the TeaBaggers are of one party and it may happen they organize into a third party eventually, but it will take years for them to work out the myriad of issues they have with the current socialist leaning government which is now in charge...... comprised of members of both Liberal and Conservative membership. The staggering number of eligible voters - I think 300 million approximately - will take years to blend and find the hot spot to which we can all give or take and accept.

It has been taken from the people and that is the issue - nobody signed on for a dictatorship or a "government knows all" kind of scenario.

The only binding issue for the TeaBaggers is the lack of input and representation offered by the representatives of THE PEOPLE in this current move to oversee the health care - which is just another control of finances (such as Social Security was years ago), finances the people must contribute to without a vote or to be heard in the matter. Maybe it is time for a change - and if that is true, the nobody told the people what was coming.

It scoffs at the Constitution - which has worked for as long as the U.S. has been a nation of the people, represented by those they vote into office as their representatives not their controllers.

Again, do you have a link where it says that there are substantial number of Democrats in the Tea Party? CNN? New York Times? ABC? CBS? Anything? The generally accepted notion is that it is just the far right Republican Party base. Hence the racist and homophobic behavior exhibited by them.

 

[DaSleeper]

When you can't dazzle with brilliance; baffle them with bullsh*t:lol:

 

[SirJosephPorter]

Please don't demean Tea Party participants as TEA BAGGERS. That epithet is not worthy of you.

Like it nor not, that is how they are known. They should have anticipated that nick name before they decided to call themselves Tea Party. They are generally known as Tea Baggers, get over it.

 

[lone wolf]

Like it nor not, that is how they are known. They should have anticipated that nick name before they decided to call themselves Tea Party. They are generally known as Tea Baggers, get over it.

Would you still consider this as civil discussion if you were referred to as what you have generally become known to some?

 

[YukonJack]

His all-knowing royal majesty, SirJosephPorter replied to my post, which pointed out that the demeaning phrase "TEA BAGGERS" is nothing more than the description of homosexuals, in the following way:

"Like it nor not, that is how they are known. They should have anticipated that nick name before they decided to call themselves Tea Party. They are generally known as Tea Baggers, get over it."

Only people with low and dirty minds transpose "TEA PARTY" to the utterly disgusting practice of SCROTUM-SUCKING, known in homosexual circles as "TEA BAGGING". Of course homosexuals are one of the most reliable pillars of the Democratic Party.

Testimony to their utter stupidity is that they ascribe a vile practice that they glorify in one breath to demean decent people on another breath.