My schools taught me that recording video and audio wasn't technologically available in the 1860's but that everyone uses it today.
Tea Party Protests: 'Ni**er,' 'Fa**ot' Shouted At Members Of Congress
- Thread starter catman
- Start date
Whoa there, ironsides. I didn't get anybody elected, I don't have a vote in USA. What you mean is that you people elected Obama.
Iraq war is winding down, as it should. More attention is being paid to Afghanistan, as it should. That is the real war on terrorism, Iraq war was just Bush's ego trip.
The astronomical debt and deficit was necessary to prevent a depression, which was a real possibility after the Bush meltdown. And since when have you been opposed to drilling? I would have thought as a conservative, you would be happy with more drilling. But then I suppose the knee jerk reaction of a conservative is to oppose anything Obama wants to do.
Of course it happened, there are at least two independent witnesses to that effect. But then I suppose nothing will convince a true blue conservative. Even if a video emerges, he will claim that the video has been faked.
And yet Pelosi who had said the day before that the epithets (supposedly) hulled at certain members, scared her to the point of tears (crocodile)
She bravely? decided to walk across to the Capitol carrying her gavel through the throngs of Tea Party Protester ....and still no videos of insults hurled at her......Hmmm Democrat proof ....same as Liberal proof;-)
In the memorable words of Jean Crétin...........
YouTube - (former) prime minister jean chretien explains...
She bravely? decided to walk across to the Capitol carrying her gavel through the throngs of Tea Party Protester ....and still no videos of insults hurled at her......Hmmm Democrat proof ....same as Liberal proof;-)
In the memorable words of Jean Crétin...........
YouTube - (former) prime minister jean chretien explains...
Sorry, should have said your kind. (I know it sounds much better now) :roll: . There was no knee jerk reaction by the Republicans, if anything it was the Democrats doing what they do best, see a chance to spend more money than is actually needed. For example do you think the average Republican wants to see us drill for oil off our coasts, no of course not. Obama has and is letting everyone down. He will be a one term President. As for the war in Iraq, that would have ended anyway, even McCain wanted out.
First sound ever recorded (1860)
YouTube - First sound ever recorded (1860)
See it was not impossible to record sounds when Lincoln was shot.
YouTube - First sound ever recorded (1860)
See it was not impossible to record sounds when Lincoln was shot.
There is video, and it didnt happen:
Eyewitness -- That Spit Don't Fly - Atlas Shrugs
Your independent witnesses are apparently independent liars.
Are you kidding? Are you aware of the Republican slogan, ‘drill, baby, drill?’ Republicans favour drilling absolutely everywhere, including all over Alaska. They want to spoil the pristine wilderness of Alaska, turn it into another Mordor; all for what the experts tell us is maybe 6 months of oil supply.
Republicans have always been in favour of drilling. Democrats have been against drilling. Where did you pick up the nonsense that Republicans are against drilling? Show me even one link to that effect.
Now, it may be that Republicans will oppose this particular drilling initiative, seeing that it comes from Obama, and the knee jerk reaction of Republicans is to oppose anything and everything Obama wants to do. But it is absurd to claim that Republicans oppose any kind of drilling. Nothing of the sort, they are enthusiastic supporters of drilling.
No doubt that is what Republicans wish. But then they were saying the same thing about Clinton, he was also going to be a one term president. The jury is still out as to whether Obama will be another Carter or another Clinton.
And it is extremely doubtful if Iraq war would have ended if Republicans had won.
Gerald Celente on Dan Diorio 25 March 2010
YouTube - GeraldCelenteChannel's Channel
Again you listen to a handful of politicians and this is across party lines. Here in Florida we do not want off shore drilling for oil, except possible 50 miles off the northeastern coast.
YouTube - GeraldCelenteChannel's Channel
Again you listen to a handful of politicians and this is across party lines. Here in Florida we do not want off shore drilling for oil, except possible 50 miles off the northeastern coast.
Last edited:
Here is a typical member of the Black Congressional Caucus, giving ample evidence of the credibility (or sanity) of the far left wing nuts:
YouTube - 3-25-2010_Hank_Johnson_Guam_Tip_Over.wmv
YouTube - 3-25-2010_Hank_Johnson_Guam_Tip_Over.wmv
I don’t know about Florida, but when Republicans and Bush were in power, they made a serious effort to drill in Alaskan wilderness, Democrats stopped them. It was even an issue in the last presidential campaign.
McCain was opposed to drilling in Alaska, Joan of Arc supported drilling. She publicly said that she hoped to change McCain’s’ mind about drilling in Alaska after he was elected.
Republicans have been long time supporters of drilling everywhere. Now it may change seeing that Obama is proposing it.
Indeed, if Obama wants Republicans to support environmental action to prevent global warming, all he has to do is come out against it, Republicans will support it.
I sure hope this idiot is not doing anything with the National Health bill. This little gnome should be recalled by his district unless he is the brightest bulb on the string. A real Georgia cracker.
I do agree about drilling for oil in Alasaka, mainly because it is fairly warm there now and I say get it before it starts coolong off again. We already have the rigs there,
Oh the irony. Or something. I love when the religious self rightious right names their group after a sex act. I've heard gays do this all the time and black people have done it too.
Such so called rewards are publicity stunts, nothing more. If somebody did produce such a video, it will be instantly declared a fake, a forgery by the one who has offered the reward. The reward is not offered with a genuine desire to find such a video, it is offered simply to make a political point.
Thus there is a prominent Creationist who has offered a reward of 100,000 $ to anybody who can prove the theory of evolution. Do you really think that he is a seeker after the truth, that if somebody proves to him that evolution is true, he will admit to it and indeed give the reward? No way, no amount of proof will be enough to convince him of evolution.
Or the birther nut and owner of WorldNetDaily, Joseph Farah has offered a 15,000 $ reward to any Hawaiian hospital who will produce Obama’s birth certificate. Do you think he is serious about that? No way. The moment a birth certificate is produced, it will be declared a forgery (unless it shows that Obama was born in Kenya). He has no intention of ever giving that reward.
Such rewards are really declared to make a political point, and are meaningless.
OK, I hereby offer a million dollar reward to anybody who proves to me that Christianity is the only true religion and God of Bible is indeed the true God. Any takers?