Ever heard of a "false flag" B00Mer? Are you saying alQaeda did this to drag the US into another war?
Would you fake a gas attack to get you grubby mitts on TWELVE TRILLION DOLLARS in resources?
It's 1600? or is it.....
Why would you trust the information provided to media by alQaeda B00Mer?
Would you fake a gas attack to get you grubby mitts on TWELVE TRILLION DOLLARS in resources?
It's 1600? or is it.....
Therefore the story is worth analyzing carefully. When we do, several things
jump out as suspicious. First the newspaper breaking the story was Al Arabiya,
initially saying that at least 500 people have been killed, according to
activists. From there it got picked up by major international media. Making the
story more fishy by the minute were reports from different media of the
alleged number of dead that changed by the minute - 635 then to 800 by USA
Today and 1,300 by Rupert Murdoch’s SkyNews.
Al Arabiya, the origin of the story, is not a neutral in the Syrian conflict. It was set up in
2002 by the Saudi Royal Family in Dubai. It is majority-owned by the Saudi
broadcaster, Middle East Broadcasting Center (MBC). Saudi Arabia is a major
financial backer of the attempt to topple Syria’s government. That is a matter
of record. So on first glance Saudi-owned media reporting such an inflammatory
anti-Assad allegation might be taken with a dose of salt.
The other aspect of the suspicious reports is the “convenient” fact
they coincide with the arrival two days earlier of an official UN weapons
inspection team, allowed by the government, to investigate allegations of
chemical weapons use in the Syrian war. It begs the most obvious question: What
conceivably would Bashar al Assad stand to gain from using banned chemical
weapons just at the time he has agreed to let a UN chemical weapons team into
Syria?

Why would you trust the information provided to media by alQaeda B00Mer?