Surely, it must be Republican smear!

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Observe the following:

Rangel Accused Of 13 Ethics Violations

No question about it! It is a lie!! Democrats are the epitome of virtue! They are never hypocrites. They could not have been dishonest! They could NEVER betray their trust!

Just ask the all-knowing Oracle, who never, EVER failed to jump on the slightest Republican indiscretion.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Observe the following:

Rangel Accused Of 13 Ethics Violations

No question about it! It is a lie!! Democrats are the epitome of virtue! They are never hypocrites. They could not have been dishonest! They could NEVER betray their trust!

Just ask the all-knowing Oracle, who never, EVER failed to jump on the slightest Republican indiscretion.
Just remember that when you point a finger at someone, you have three pointing back at you. Republican/Democrat: it is the nature of the beast in politics, that you have to be a hypocrite, crook, liar and greedy to get elected. What did you say you were - 72? You haven't learned much about how things work.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Actually I see very little difference between the Republicans and Democrats in the US. They are both parties that have been purchased by the US establishment; in fact some members have been purchased by members of foreign nations. They both seem to be full of liars, hypocrites, and double dealers that will sell their country short for political donations. Small wonder that the US ranks 20th on the world corruption index.

The 2006 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index — Infoplease.com
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Observe the following:

Rangel Accused Of 13 Ethics Violations

No question about it! It is a lie!! Democrats are the epitome of virtue! They are never hypocrites. They could not have been dishonest! They could NEVER betray their trust!

Just ask the all-knowing Oracle, who never, EVER failed to jump on the slightest Republican indiscretion.
Looks to me it was a self-imposed Bush tax cut.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
So jack is this worse than a homophobic, anti gay republican being convicted of soliciting sex from boys in a public washroom? And since you support these clowns and the catholic church which is overflowing with pedophiles do you go trolling for young boys in public washrooms as well? Or does your preacher supply them?
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
The Associated Press: Democrats say Rangel should resign

And even the President:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0710/Obama_Time_for_Rangel_to_end_career_with_dignity.html

taxslave, how does an indiscreet and illicit sexual misadventure affect your pocket book?

As opposed to the self-serving power-grabbing acts of a despicable SOB, who needs his constituents for their foolish and misguided votes but spits them in the eye with his hypocritical actions?

How many of Rangel's constituents benefit from the law this bastard wrote for the benefit of nobody but himself?
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
The Associated Press: Democrats say Rangel should resign

And even the President:

Obama: Time for Rangel to end career "with dignity" - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

taxslave, how does an indiscreet and illicit sexual misadventure affect your pocket book?

As opposed to the self-serving power-grabbing acts of a despicable SOB, who needs his constituents for their foolish and misguided votes but spits them in the eye with his hypocritical actions?

How many of Rangel's constituents benefit from the law this bastard wrote for the benefit of nobody but himself?

It doesn't.
It is simply hypocritical. In enlightened countries like Canada it is not illicit either. I don't care if he likes boys better than girls. But if he was any kind of a man he would just announce that he is gay and there would be no problem.
As for Wrangel, your link did not say what law he wrote to serve only himself and for it to pass into law there must have been a substantial number of others voted for it.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
petros, thanks for revealing to all the world how you feel about blacks. You condemned yourself by your own post #11, but of course, you never had the guts to say what you meant.

And you and your ilk have the nerve to bad-mouth Republicans!!!!
Nice try at deflection. You cannot possibly be so thick that you can't see that the racist remark was aimed at you because your attitude toward Obama, no matter how you try to couch it, is a racist one. If you would like, we could take a poll and see how many people on here agree about that.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Cliffy, take all th polls you'd like.

For being racist, Obama and his blind, myopic and slavish, slobbering acolytes beat me by country mile.