supporting our troops??

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
I support terrorism, it's worked for your country why wouldn't other countrys follow your lead. You are the leaders aren,t you? You're world leaders in bullshit and you have no moral authority whatever.

I'd like to see this list of terrorist acts carried out by the United States beaver. This should be interesting folks. I'll start the list off for you:

1. The Fake Moon Landing - This was so oil companies would ship barrels of oil to NASA for a "space project" but really the head of NASA would just horde the oil hahaha.

2. Martha Stuart - This isn't a woman at all, in fact her real name is MARTIN Stuart and he is a sleeper agent for the CIA. His role is to identify possible threats to homeland security and give them recepies that'll increase their bad colesterol slowly over time, DIABOLICAL!

3. The War in Iraq - Oil

4. The War in Afghanistan - Oil

5. The War in The Former Yugoslavia - Oil...errr keeping the muslims down

6. The War in Somalia - Oil, no really they've got tons of oil

7. The Conflict in Haiti - Oil, those Haitians are hording billions of barrels of Oil under their mudhuts. Bastards!

8. The Mars Lander - Designed to fly to Mars, claim Mars for the USA, and then exploit the rich Oil reserves on that desolate planet.

9. The Hybrid Car - Weaken the Worlds dependance on Oil, even while we're out taking over Countries for....Oil....that we will....use....in....our....aww crap.

10. Beck - His outrageous rhymes are designed to slowly sap the mental strength of human beings everywhere. With words like odahlay, can the human mind stand up to this at all?
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
darkbeaver said:
Jay said:
darkbeaver said:
I support terrorism, it's worked for your country why wouldn't other countrys follow your lead. You are the leaders aren,t you? You're world leaders in bullshit and you have no moral authority whatever.

“When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors.”
Ann Coulter

Guess it's too late for you DB; you are a traitor.

Actually Jay I'm a patriot,

No, DB you're an idiot and a traitor who declared his support for terrorism.

If this was an earlier period in time you would be shot for sedition and for being a traitor. You lend support to the enemy while you ride the comforts we afford you. This should end. You should pick up your traitor ass, and move to the wretched marks in the world where you say you are a citizen. Screw you and your traitor ideas. Leave the country so as our tax dollars don't go to help your traitor ass out in anyway....how does a traitor like you feel when he gets to use the infrastructure's afforded by the tax dollars of the people you despise....be a man, leave and join your comrades out there. With any luck an American will shoot you in the battle field. But I know traitors like you need to comforts we afford, so my request will go unfulfilled.

Trip and fall down the stairs today in such away that your neck breaks.



They've hit us and we've got to hit back hard, and I'm not just talking about the terrorists.
Ann Coulter

Today has been brought to you by the letters F and U and by the word SHOT.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: supporting our troops??

Mogz said:
Actually Jay I'm a patriot

You are NOT a patriot :roll:

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=patriot

But he is an idiot.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=idiot

I like # 2

"A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive."
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: supporting our troops??

aeon said:
Colpy said:
Edited to say:

For AEON!

Sorry Beav, I thought that was you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Guy, I read the link above, down to the part where they claimed 1.5 million Iraqis wrongfully dead as a direct result of US-backed UN sanctions.

That discredited the entre article.

These people are obviously delusional idiots.



I didnt know those who has worked for the sanctions in iraq, when it happened, u know direct witnesses, were delusional idiots, i always think those who are delusional idiots, were the ones who believe anything a bunch of fascist moron that has been caught to lying on many occasions.

Aeon, two points:

1. If you knew anything about anything, you would know that the figures on the number of children/adults that supposedly died as the result of sanctions were given out by the IRAQI government of the day. They were pure, unadulterated propaganda with no basis in reality.

2. Even if the figures were accurate, the fault lies directly with Saddam Hussein. During the period of sanctions, he spent hundreds of millions of dollars building himself palaces. There were no sanctions against medicines, etc., so the reason his people died was his greed.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Aeon, two points:

1. If you knew anything about anything, you would know that the figures on the number of children/adults that supposedly died as the result of sanctions were given out by the IRAQI government of the day. They were pure, unadulterated propaganda with no basis in reality.

2. Even if the figures were accurate, the fault lies directly with Saddam Hussein. During the period of sanctions, he spent hundreds of millions of dollars building himself palaces. There were no sanctions against medicines, etc., so the reason his people died was his greed.

Well said.
 

Doryman

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
435
2
18
St. John's
Re: RE: supporting our troops

darkbeaver said:
I support terrorism, it's worked for your country why wouldn't other countrys follow your lead. You are the leaders aren,t you? You're world leaders in bullshit and you have no moral authority whatever.

You see, I always wondered about this Beaver. Whenever a man supports the war in Iraq, or the War in Afghanistan, or whatever, the first thing out of your kind's mouth is:

"O yeh. Tehn why arent you out fihting of the soldiers on teh Front lines, huh? U must be waiting for the oil of theis Bush-o-fascist war on oil to ful ur dumb car!!!"

So let's turn the tables, DB. Why aren't you over with the Iraqis/Afghanis? Why haven't you picked up and AK and stood on the front-line with your fellow mujahideen. Why aren't you tossing molotovs with the rest of the Taliban? Starbucks too tasty over here? Want to fight the oppressive Western Empire, but don't want to get sand in your new iPod?

Obviously not, that would ruin your Rage against the Machine soundtrack, and then what background music would define your reign of destruction as you wore hilariously edgy "Impeach Bush" t-shirts around campus, and lingered in "no loitering" zones?

Keep up the good fight Beav, take down that Amerikan Empire with rally's, sit-ins and the all-powerful skateboard. Viva la Pseudo-Revolution, my Brother, Viva la Beaver!!
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Re: RE: supporting our troops??

DerekJay said:
Jay said:
It's like suddenly 9/11 didn't happen....

Whoa... Hold on there. IF you think that Afghanistan is about 911, then you need to give your head a shake.

In short - PIPELINE.

That's why so many Canadians are against this involvement. There is no sound reason for being in that country other than to support the U.S. Oil and gas initiatives. Period.

You have a short memory, and an inability to read.
 

orpheus

Nominee Member
Mar 14, 2006
85
0
6
Canada, I would presume.
Alright, well I haven't gone through every post made because the majority seems likes a load of emotional bs.

It should be noted however, that discussing whether we should have gone into Afghanistan or not is currently irrelevant. The fact is, now that we're there, we can't just leave. If you ruin a country in a war you have to help reconstruct it. That's why the U.S is going to be in Iraq for a minimum of ten more years. (Note how George W. always dodges the question of when the troops are going to return home etc. etc.)

I was watching the CBC last night and they had a kernal on there discussing Canada's role in the war. (Whether or not we're at 'war' is under debate.) He commented that Canada was there as a peackeeper. That's where a lot of the confusion enters. Not many people know what peackeeping actually is, and many use it as a generic term. In reality, peackeeping is constantly evolving and it differs with every operation.

Whether you support this endeavor or not, the main thing you should realize is that Canda can't leave. They're in there and just returning and leaving the crap the war has caused behind them is ridiculous. Once you enter a war or war-related effort, you stay there until you finish the job.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: supporting our troops

HaHaHa clean the froth and off your monitor, you were in such a hurry to get a shot off that you rendered your first few lines funnier than they would normally have been, at least your fat covered heart is pounding and your breaking into a sweat, I'm good for you boatman, probubly the most excitment you've ever had.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Hey Mogz were do the Taliban come from?

Kabul Afghanistan actually :) I know what you're getting at, but you've mixed up the name of the group(s). The Taliban is a religious sect of Afghan culture that held power for a brief period in Afghanistan. So now, this is where you'd try to correct me saying they were funded by the U.S. Then I'd come back and say no that was Al-qaeda and the Mujahadeen. Then you'd flip out and call me a baby-killer and say i'm mean, a disgrace to Canada, and that you hate me. Then I'd laugh and move on. There I just saved us each 20 minutes of bickering.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Alright, well I haven't gone through every post made because the majority seems likes a load of emotional bs.

It should be noted however, that discussing whether we should have gone into Afghanistan or not is currently irrelevant. The fact is, now that we're there, we can't just leave. If you ruin a country in a war you have to help reconstruct it. That's why the U.S is going to be in Iraq for a minimum of ten more years. (Note how George W. always dodges the question of when the troops are going to return home etc. etc.)

I was watching the CBC last night and they had a kernal on there discussing Canada's role in the war. (Whether or not we're at 'war' is under debate.) He commented that Canada was there as a peackeeper. That's where a lot of the confusion enters. Not many people know what peackeeping actually is, and many use it as a generic term. In reality, peackeeping is constantly evolving and it differs with every operation.

Whether you support this endeavor or not, the main thing you should realize is that Canda can't leave. They're in there and just returning and leaving the crap the war has caused behind them is ridiculous. Once you enter a war or war-related effort, you stay there until you finish the job.

1. It's Colonel (just some FYI :))

2. The Colonel on CBC, I saw that, was a moron trying to appease the Canadian public. We're at War, hence the issue of the General Campaign Star for service of 30 days or more in Afghanistan.

3. Good post :)
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
How many interviews do you think the see-B-see had to go through to get the answers they were looking for?
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
War and oil yep that's all thats important that and men having pissing contests. Want a female perspective, no-shut up and listen: Taliban era: Imagine being a Muslim female in Afghanistan, some slimy moralistic government appointed cleric trolls the streets looking for females committing crimes against Alla just by looking at someone the wrong way. She is property to do with as they wish to discard and abuse at will. The power pucking sadists were controling every aspect of a Afghan Females lives. Now on to the children another disposible commodity in Afghanistan, strap a bomb on to your son's chest tell him to Scream Alla and die. Enter the Canadians, women and female children are now being allowed to go to school, can vote. Sorry guys while your screaming the pros and cons of the war there are men/women out there doing something more constructive that pissing at each other on the net. Not that most of the males posting here read anything written by gasp a female. Canada's Military you are in my prayers.
 

orpheus

Nominee Member
Mar 14, 2006
85
0
6
Canada, I would presume.
1. It's Colonel (just some FYI )

Aha, yes. XD I blame this mix up on the fact that I just came out of math class and my prof looks like Kernal Sanders. Yes...I'll use that one.

2. The Colonel on CBC, I saw that, was a moron trying to appease the Canadian public. We're at War, hence the issue of the General Campaign Star for service of 30 days or more in Afghanistan.

I would agree that is answers were ambiguous. However, he made an interesting point in regards to peackeeping. It is used generically. "Canada is a peacekeeper." Most people don't know what peacekeeping involves. I would also agree with him in the fact that it's constantly changing. Note, however, that he couldn't answer as to what peacekeeping in Afghanistan is. Heh.

How many interviews do you think the see-B-see had to go through to get the answers they were looking for?
No, I don't. How many, I'd really like to know.
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
Enter the Canadians, women and female children are now being allowed to go to school, can vote.

Not to mention drive a car, and serve in the Government. Also women are no longer required to wear the burka in Afghanistan. That vote was a landslide victory for not making it mandatory.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Of course I read posts written by females....why wouldn't I?
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
Lets see Jay and Mogz read my post, of course you guys did, want to take a bet that the anit-war zealots are pissing in the shrubbery after reading it.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Although Mogzy might be more of a man than I....but were both real men, and real men love women and uphold that old conservative value called Chivalry.