Don't worry Jersay, we all make mistakes! (well except me, but you get the idea)
Jersay said:Thinking that our troops are following orders and defend our right to freedom of speech, is completly ridicoulus, that is exactly what governement want you to think.they are there for coorporations interest period.
Considering that I am a soldier, and I hate corporations, don't even try to put me or any of my fellow soldiers in to the section that they are following corpoation orders. Because maybe at the political level it has something to do with corporation, maybe, but a any soldier would they do it for their own reasons.
I do it to help people. So I don't think that is a corporation kind of mentality.
Besides if we work for corporations,maybe next time a natural disaster occurs, we wouldn't come to help.
Concerning the interest of Canadian public to discuss this situation, if they want to discuss it fine, go right ahead but leave it up to the Generals and the government in charge to deal with the situation. Don't have any of these votes or things saying the troops have to come home because we are over there, and are staying over there until decided otherwise by the military or by the Afghan government.
And the fact is plain and simple why all this fuss is going on now is because Canadians are now dying overseas. If they had listened to General Hillier in the fall and not watch sports or changed the channel they would be more prepared now.
Thinking that our troops are following orders and defend our right to freedom of speech, is completly ridicoulus, that is exactly what governement want you to think.they are there for coorporations interest period.
That is probably the only thing that the army is good for, to help people when a disasters occurs.
help people where?? in haiti?? where we have helped to crashed down an elected leaders (aristide), kill protesters during protest, that is what you called helping peoples??
in afganisthan?? what are we doing there?? there is no democracy in afganisthan, alquada are still there and well and in pakistan too, us left not much troops there , they let to the united nations, thinking the world will be stupid enough to think saddam hussein was dangerous.
We are in afganisthan to help cooporation to build a pipeline to reach and provide oil to china,
aeon said:That is probably the only thing that the army is good for, to help people when a disasters occurs.
aeon said:help people where?? in haiti?? where we have helped to crashed down an elected leaders (aristide), kill protesters during protest, that is what you called helping peoples??
aeon said:in afganisthan?? what are we doing there?? there is no democracy in afganisthan, alquada are still there and well and in pakistan too, us left not much troops there , they let to the united nations, thinking the world will be stupid enough to think saddam hussein was dangerous.
aeon said:We are in afganisthan to help cooporation to build a pipeline to reach and provide oil to china,
aeon said:otherwise the americans would have really killed the supposed real guilty of 9-11, since no evidence shows alquada was behind 9-11,
aeon said:and all this non sense about the war in iraq and oussama bin laden, the only conclusion that is logical, 9-11 was done by high level official of the us governement to persue their agenda, so the american would support growing military budget, and a war in iraq to get their coorporation pumping oil and rebuilding.
you love to blow hot air, don't you? or is it just you like the taste of footleather?
You know nothing about my history. You just resort to ad hominums because you lack a valid argument.
a soldier must build his own morale. nobody else is going to do it. THe dymanics of group support help, but the belief must come from within. Unless of course you are submitting you are a mindless drone that only responds to fed stimuli.
progressive said:The fact that Afghanistan needed help is of course true, but our reasons for going are without morality, integrity, decency, honesty, or goodness.....it is the attack on an ally of ours that led us down this road....and to be honest, an ally that had it coming. If you look at the history of America's role in Afghanistan in 1979, you can see that the attacks of 911 were not without provocation.
I think not said:The dead Canadian soldiers of WWI & WWII must be rolling in their graves right about now. How utterly disrepesctful!
I think not said:Yes in Haiti, where you helped get rid of another tyrant.
I think not said:Yes Afghanistan, where democracy is well on it's way. I can't wait till you stick your foot in your mouth. And Saddam Hussein was dangerous.....not anymore.
I think not said:You're spending money on protecting China's oil pipelines? Where do you get your information from? A crystal ball?
aeon said:Right, we just decided to get up and invade a cold mountainous region to export opium. :roll:
I think not said:We were buying their oil anyway aeon, how many times do we have to bring this up? And could have used the money rebuilding American infrastructure instead.
I think not said:I really don't understand people the way they think sometimes.
aeon said:I think not said:The dead Canadian soldiers of WWI & WWII must be rolling in their graves right about now. How utterly disrepesctful!
Ding dong, what the ww2 has to do with today?? absotly nothing at all, cause in ww2, 90% of victims were soldiers, today 90% of victims are civilians.
Colpy said:1. Working to help Bosnian Muslims.
2. Paying Muslim countries in the Middle East trillions for their oil.
3. Helping Islamists fight the Sovet infidel.
4. Defending the Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina from secular Iraq.
5. Living in a society where the Muslim minority is free to worship as they please.
Yep. The Yanks deserved it. As did the 24 Canadians killed.
Traditionally, Iraqi farmers used “farm-saved seed” and the free innovation with and exchange of planting materials among farming communities has long been the basis of agricultural practice. According to the Food Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 97 percent of Iraqi farmers used farm-saved seeds from their own stocks from last year harvest or purchased from local market. The new law deprives Iraqi farmers of their innovation and development of important crops such barley, wheat, pulses and the famous Iraqi date. Despite extreme aridity, characterised by low rainfalls and soil salinity, Iraq had a world standard agricultural sector producing good quality food for generations.
Under the new US Order, the saving and planting of seeds will be illegal and market will only offer plant material produced by transactional agribusiness corporations. The US Order introduces a system of private monopoly rights over seeds and will force Iraqi farmers to relay on big US corporations to buy its yearly crop seeds for planting. The term of the monopoly is 20 years for crop varieties and 25 for trees and vines. During this time the protected variety de facto becomes the property of the breeder, and nobody can plant or otherwise use this variety without compensating the breeder.
Jay said:Screw security....it's all about seeds!