Solar panels. Useless or the future?

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Well said. In this case, the technology is not up to par with the current, existing products in terms of servicing the needs of the public

... The same reason that the flying carpet car never caught on

heehehehe

There is a required market environment needed to achieve technological advancement. Its a dynamic environment. And the proper logistics need to be in place for it to work.
Unfortunately the electric car faces many dynamic challenges. Its why it has had poor results in advancing it technology.

Or its a conspiracy like the left always think
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,409
11,455
113
Low Earth Orbit
The guy from the monopoly box. He had battery makers killed in the 1930s.

 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Of course... I can't believe that it was staring us in the face all this time.

The Big Board Game lobby is squarely behind the suppression of this tech.

Betcha they were the ones that had Nikola Tesla silenced as well
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
I considered hydrogen cells to be more promising than batteries foe EVs.
 

Gilgamesh

Council Member
Nov 15, 2014
1,098
56
48
Well my doc told me repeatedly that the CPAP route is nearly always bullshit. BTW I also spent a night in a hospital sleep clinic. In my case and that of a friend, a memory foam stiff pillow has worked wonders.

Hydrogen is indeed a wonderful fuel and isee, by far, the most common element in the universe.

Unfortunately, their is no way of extracting it efficientry. Every method requires more energy per unit than the hydrogen contains.
 

Gilgamesh

Council Member
Nov 15, 2014
1,098
56
48
I have absolutely no idea why this creature thinks his post has any relevance to mine.

Very strange indeed.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
Well my doc told me repeatedly that the CPAP route is nearly always bullshit.



Well, your doc is an idiot.


I had my doubts about a CPAP machine, tried all kinds of things. Now I have one. And the three doctors that I know personally are impressed with its effectiveness.


So maybe your doc should go on some CME courses.

Oh no, he used the word ilk!

DAA DA DAAAAAAAAAA!



I wonder if he goes ilk hunting?
 

Gilgamesh

Council Member
Nov 15, 2014
1,098
56
48
My dentist referred me to my docs (plural) who referred me to an ENT specialist who had me wired up overnight in a sleep lab.


Everybody said I needed a CPAP machine but the sleep lab record was marginal. I elected not to use the CPAP machine.

That was about 5 years ago. Since then I have seen the CPAP machine lose & regain its trendy status.

Certainly trust your doctor but remember medicines has its trends and obsessions too.

My docs still say my breathing etc is marginal. Big deal.

I can walk 2 miles easily, I sleep reasonably well for an old fart & I'm in my eighties.

Reminds me of the statins I was taking for 25 years.

I showed the doc research paper that showed that are now suggesting statins do almost nothing. Went off statins and my HDL/LDL remain fine.

I will continue my own path, thank you.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
My dentist referred me to my docs (plural) who referred me to an ENT specialist who had me wired up overnight in a sleep lab.


Everybody said I needed a CPAP machine but the sleep lab record was marginal. I elected not to use the CPAP machine.

That was about 5 years ago. Since then I have seen the CPAP machine lose & regain its trendy status.

Certainly trust your doctor but remember medicines has its trends and obsessions too.

My docs still say my breathing etc is marginal. Big deal.

I can walk 2 miles easily, I sleep reasonably well for an old fart & I'm in my eighties.

Reminds me of the statins I was taking for 25 years.

I showed the doc research paper that showed that are now suggesting statins do almost nothing. Went off statins and my HDL/LDL remain fine.

I will continue my own path, thank you.

Statins are worse than junk, the good goes with the bad.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
Not a clue what you are reading. That is just barely the output of one small generating station. Say how well do your solar panels work at night?
I think you missed the part about solar panels and batteries working together.

but don't worry about it, it will be 5-6 years before they take over.
 

OmegaOm

Electoral Member
Nov 4, 2017
166
0
16
To answer the OPS question instead of debating the politics of green energy.

You said you tested your panel not facing the Sun and got 0.2 Amps.
Solar Panels will not even get close to the rated output if its not in direct Sun. Even a cloud passing by will crush the Amps. And you can not estimate the total power you are going to get by how many hours of daylight.
The suns power changes all day being strongest at noon and very week near sunrise and sunset.

IF you have to use that panel I would always keep it facing the Sun and at best maybe say 1/3 of the daylight hours X the Amps.

Since you need the power for something important. I would get a car battery or rv battery and charge it at home like someone said before. A car Battery can have 100 Amps hours, that is more then enough power to last you a week camping. You can even take you car battery out of your car and use that and have your car recharge it.
Or you can get a bigger Panel.

And definitely not useless and its the future.
How is free power from the Sun useless.

If you solar power your house and your house gets good sun, you can have the system paid off in about 9 years. The panels would last over 25 years, but you will still have battery maintenance. Still you save in long run and its only going to get cheaper in the future.
I always like the security you get by not being dependent on the grid.
 
Last edited:

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
To answer the OPS question instead of debating the politics of green energy.

You said you tested your panel not facing the Sun and got 0.2 Amps.
Solar Panels will not even get close to the rated output if its not in direct Sun. Even a cloud passing by will crush the Amps. And you can not estimate the total power you are going to get by how many hours of daylight.
The suns power changes all day being strongest at noon and very week near sunrise and sunset.

IF you have to use that panel I would always keep it facing the Sun and at best maybe say 1/3 of the daylight hours X the Amps.

Since you need the power for something important. I would get a car battery or rv battery and charge it at home like someone said before. A car Battery can have 100 Amps hours, that is more then enough power to last you a week camping. You can even take you car battery out of your car and use that and have your car recharge it.
Or you can get a bigger Panel.

And definitely not useless and its the future.
How is free power from the Sun useless.

If you solar power your house and your house gets good sun, you can have the system paid off in about 9 years. The panels would last over 25 years, but you will still have battery maintenance. Still you save in long run and its only going to get cheaper in the future.
I always like the security you get by not being dependent on the grid.

i chose the not ideal conditions to test my system because that is how it is used when im camping. ie the max number of sunlight hours that i have are from sunrise to sunset. thank you for point out that not all the hours are equal.

also, i chose indirect sunlight because when im camping i dont have time to be calculating and adjusting the angle of the panel to the sun. why? well i guess im too busy camping.

anyway, ive come up with my best solution without buying more equipment.
here's my solution:
1 - i used the car alternator to bulk charge the battery for about an hour. because i dont want the alternator to charge the battery at too fast of a rate, i use the 7amp charge controller( the one that comes with my solar panel) to limit the current.
2 - then i connect the battery to my solar panel and let the solar panel do the only thing that it is good at, ie trickle charge the battery for the rest of the day.
on a good day, the battery experiences a full absorption charge from the solar panel.

i also have a 2amp charger that plugs into a 500 watt inverter that i own. it too bulk charges the battery in about 3 hours. it is gentler on the battery. but it involves running the car longer than i like. h9wever, i do carry it and use it if im traveling from one location to another.