RE: So you think it's not
And that somebody appears to be you. We will continue to criticise your country as we see fit.
And that somebody appears to be you. We will continue to criticise your country as we see fit.
Reverend Blair said:And that somebody appears to be you. We will continue to criticise your country as we see fit.
I know you will, when you were British subjects you did, when you became Canadians in 1947 you did and alot of you still do, how can alot of Canadians define themselves without criticising Americans? You can't from your perspective. Indeed it defines who you are by negation and self serving superior morality.
zenfisher said:I think not May 07, 2005 12:13 pm :: Re: RE: So you think it's not
Look at me!
Posts: 332
Location: New York City
Reverend Blair wrote:
And that somebody appears to be you. We will continue to criticise your country as we see fit.
I know you will, when you were British subjects you did, when you became Canadians in 1947 you did and alot of you still do, how can alot of Canadians define themselves without criticising Americans? You can't from your perspective. Indeed it defines who you are by negation and self serving superior morality.
When you became Canadians in 1947????????????????????
That's correct zenfisher, 1947. Canada had British subjects until the Canadian citizenship act of 1947. Why is this even an issue? This is history
Canada (Correction, The British) has tried to peacefully maintain its existence in the world since confederation. Negativity usually results from being trashed by citizen from another country. Maybe your concern is that the "self serving superior morallity" is, though tried to impressed upon the world by US policies, a matter of gulit from the American perspective.
I think not
Reverend Blair said:I know you will, when you were British subjects you did, when you became Canadians in 1947 you did and alot of you still do, how can alot of Canadians define themselves without criticising Americans? You can't from your perspective. Indeed it defines who you are by negation and self serving superior morality.
You are just another anti-Canadian with a huge chip on your shoulder who is defining yourself by complaining about the policies of a country that isn't hated around the world, I think not.
zenfisher said:British subjects yes, but Canada operated indepedent of the British empire since Confederation. Even before Confedration people born in Canada were British subjects ...after that they were considered to be part of the Commonwealth.
Canada did not operate independantly, even the laws in the Canadian parliament had to be ratified in London and on many occassions they were denied
You may think not,but one only has to ask other countries how the US & Canada are perceived in the world to find how the world views my differ from US opinion.
Thats a timeworn myth zenfisher, Canada 40 years ago had clout, I'll be the first to say that. Canadas leaders have disgraced a proud past, I repeat PAST. The fact is that the average person in the world only knows what CIC tells them and that Canada is north of the US!
Reverend Blair said:You aren't even bright enough to understand the relationship between Canada and Britain...or the other Commonwealth countries for that matter, I think not.
Yes Rev, you are quite the moderator constantly insulting members of this board, the administrator must be very proud of you. Perhaps you should read the Terms of Service again, think you can find the link yourself?
Nice retreat into obfuscating pedantry though.
The reality is that Canadians were considered to be such by the European powers (and even thinking Americans) from before your War of Independence. That feeling became even more strong in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century when we began accepting a lot of immigrants from Eastern European countries and the United States in order to settle the three prairie provinces.
"I was born a British Subject - and I will die a British subject" -John A. MacDonald
I see no reason why you would deny your heritage.
I think not said:zenfisher said:British subjects yes, but Canada operated indepedent of the British empire since Confederation. Even before Confedration people born in Canada were British subjects ...after that they were considered to be part of the Commonwealth.
Canada did not operate independantly, even the laws in the Canadian parliament had to be ratified in London and on many occassions they were denied
You may think not,but one only has to ask other countries how the US & Canada are perceived in the world to find how the world views my differ from US opinion.
Thats a timeworn myth zenfisher, Canada 40 years ago had clout, I'll be the first to say that. Canadas leaders have disgraced a proud past, I repeat PAST. The fact is that the average person in the world only knows what CIC tells them and that Canada is north of the US!
I really dont see why you are turning this into an issue, most Canadians will tell you it is part of their heritage, so what is the difference in view here? We going to rewrite history?
The reality is that Canadians were considered to be such by the European powers (and even thinking Americans) from before your War of Independence. That feeling became even more strong in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century when we began accepting a lot of immigrants from Eastern European countries and the United States in order to settle the three prairie provinces.
Actually, as we've begun to differentiate ourselves from the US again, our status in the international community has risen. We lost much of our clout in the Mulroney years when all we did was kowtow to Reagan and Bush I.
Reverend Blair said:There is no point arguing with him, Zen. He spent 15 minutes in Canada once, watched bow-tie boy a couple of times, and now he thinks he knows all there is to know about Canada.
Your need for self-promotion, self-advertisement and influence is intriguing. Try to sway from assumptions, it only furthers your ignorance.
Since he never responded in any meaningful way, I'll try again:
The reality is that Canadians were considered to be such by the European powers (and even thinking Americans) from before your War of Independence. That feeling became even more strong in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century when we began accepting a lot of immigrants from Eastern European countries and the United States in order to settle the three prairie provinces.
Nobody had that perception Rev, of course you are a nationalist and you have to believe in it. I'll say it again "I was born a British subject - and I will die a British subject" John A. MacDonald
Actually, as we've begun to differentiate ourselves from the US again, our status in the international community has risen. We lost much of our clout in the Mulroney years when all we did was kowtow to Reagan and Bush I.
I'll repeat again, the average person around the world knows and hears next to nothing about Canada, other than it is north of the US. You bring this upon yourselves in defining yourselves by negation. Even countries within the commonwealth know very little, unless they have an interest in immigrating to Canada and that being the case, the CIC gives the information.
ithinknot said:Your need for self-promotion, self-advertisement and influence is intriguing. Try to sway from assumptions, it only furthers your ignorance.
ithinknot said:Nobody had that perception Rev, of course you are a nationalist and you have to believe in it. I'll say it again "I was born a British subject - and I will die a British subject" John A. MacDonald
ithinknot said:I'll repeat again, the average person around the world knows and hears next to nothing about Canada, other than it is north of the US. You bring this upon yourselves in defining yourselves by negation. Even countries within the commonwealth know very little, unless they have an interest in immigrating to Canada and that being the case, the CIC gives the information.