So you think it's not about the oil?

[peapod]

Sick and distrubing is more like it.

 

[Reverend Blair]

RE: So you think it's not

He does wear a pink tutu though. ;-)

 

[WarHawk]

RE: So you think it's not

I wasn't banned at CKA for trolling FYI.

 

[Reverend Blair]

RE: So you think it's not

What were you banned for? Starting fights. making inflammatory posts. harrassing other members. That's generally considered trolling.

 

[WarHawk]

RE: So you think it's not

I was banned for asking a moderator a question. I kid you not.

 

[Vanni Fucci]

I only use non-partisan sources to back my claims, such as wikipedia. My name is warhawk and I wear a pink tutu.

I'd be a little more demanding of my information source than that Chickenhawk...wikipedia is an open source online encyclopedia. The articles are submitted by web posters, not unlike this forum, and sometimes are not screened very well by the administration. There have been more than a few instances where the information obtained from wikipedia has been obviously skewed or outright false.

Having said that, wikipedia is a fine source of information though if it can be corroborated with other sources...and the reliability of information is improving with time...

Thank you,

...and have a swell f**king day...

 

[Reverend Blair]

RE: So you think it's not

That's about the most ridiculous claim you've made yet, Warhawk. Your posts are still up there, under both Warhawk and Warhawkster for anybody who wants to check for themselves.

 

[WarHawk]

I only use non-partisan sources to back my claims, such as wikipedia. My name is warhawk and I wear a pink tutu.

I'd be a little more demanding of my information source than that Chickenhawk...wikipedia is an open source online encyclopedia. The articles are submitted by web posters, not unlike this forum, and sometimes are not screened very well by the administration. There have been more than a few instances where the information obtained from wikipedia has been obviously skewed or outright false.

Having said that, wikipedia is a fine source of information though if it can be corroborated with other sources...and the reliability of information is improving with time...

Thank you,

...and have a swell f**king day...

I gave wikipedia merely as an example.

The differance between wikipedia and a forum is that everyone can contribute and edit articles. I find that it is usualy the minor articles that display any POV (which is fairly rare from what I have seen). But if a major article about gun control, or abortion for instance displays a POV it is quickly edited to be more objective.

 

[WarHawk]

Re: RE: So you think it's not

That's about the most ridiculous claim you've made yet, Warhawk. Your posts are still up there, under both Warhawk and Warhawkster for anybody who wants to check for themselves.

I'd think I’d know a bit more about my banning than you would. I asked one of the mods a question, he got mad and subsequently banned me. Even one of the other moderators disagreed with the decision.

 

[Oona]

RE: So you think it's not

Warhawk's a genious and anyone who disagrees is a bloody red commie. So sayeth the Oona.

 

[Oona]

RE: So you think it's not

By the way, I hear Rev blair smells like vinegar and radishes left in a warm moist dark place for several weeks.

 

[Vanni Fucci]

Re: RE: So you think it's not

Warhawk's a genious and anyone who disagrees is a bloody red commie. So sayeth the Oona.

By the way, I hear Rev blair smells like vinegar and radishes left in a warm moist dark place for several weeks.

:laughing3: :thefinger: :stfu:

 

[Oona]

Re: RE: So you think it's not

Warhawk's a genious and anyone who disagrees is a bloody red commie. So sayeth the Oona.

:laughing3: :thefinger: :stfu:

Hey those are cute!

 

[Jo Canadian]

Warhawk's a genious and anyone who disagrees is a bloody red commie. So sayeth the Oona.

Oona need go skool, or at least go to Dictionary.com and learn how to spell genius.

If you want to start pointless arguements during a discussion, go make a new thread to vent your irrevelant name-calling issues.

I agree with Vanni.

 

[Reverend Blair]

RE: So you think it's not

Completely off-topic and locked.