So, how about that Syrian chemical attack thing?
- Thread starter Murphy
- Start date
Pentagon Trained Syria’s Al Qaeda “Rebels” in the Use of Chemical Weapons
The Western media refutes their own lies
Not only do they confirm that the Pentagon has been training the terrorists in the use of chemical weapons, they also acknowledge the existence of a not so secret “US-backed plan to launch a chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime”
London’s Daily Mail in a 2013 article confirmed the existence of an Anglo-American project endorsed by the White House (with the assistance of Qatar) to wage a chemical weapons attack on Syria and place the blame of Bashar Al Assad.
The following Mail Online article was published and subsequently removed. Note the contradictory discourse: “Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al Assad”, “White House gave green light to chemical weapons attack”.
This Mail Online report published in January 2013 was subsequently removed from Mail Online. For further details click here The Pentagon’s Training of “Rebels” (aka Al Qaeda Terrorists) in the Use of Chemical Weapons
CNN accuses Bashar Al Assad of killing his own people while also acknowledging that the “rebels” are not only in possession of chemical weapons, but that these “moderate terrorists” affiliated with Al Nusra are trained in the use of chemical weapons by specialists on contract to the Pentagon.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/pentag...rebels-in-the-use-of-chemical-weapons/5583784
The Western media refutes their own lies
Not only do they confirm that the Pentagon has been training the terrorists in the use of chemical weapons, they also acknowledge the existence of a not so secret “US-backed plan to launch a chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime”
London’s Daily Mail in a 2013 article confirmed the existence of an Anglo-American project endorsed by the White House (with the assistance of Qatar) to wage a chemical weapons attack on Syria and place the blame of Bashar Al Assad.
The following Mail Online article was published and subsequently removed. Note the contradictory discourse: “Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al Assad”, “White House gave green light to chemical weapons attack”.
This Mail Online report published in January 2013 was subsequently removed from Mail Online. For further details click here The Pentagon’s Training of “Rebels” (aka Al Qaeda Terrorists) in the Use of Chemical Weapons
CNN accuses Bashar Al Assad of killing his own people while also acknowledging that the “rebels” are not only in possession of chemical weapons, but that these “moderate terrorists” affiliated with Al Nusra are trained in the use of chemical weapons by specialists on contract to the Pentagon.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/pentag...rebels-in-the-use-of-chemical-weapons/5583784
:lol: Of course.
Reactions. Nothing loud or threatening. No one is actually upset. Russian relations might be icy, but nothing unexpected. Rootin' Tootin' Putin isn't a trustworthy type anyway..
As of 0145 hrs, 3 Syrian soldiers dead. No Russians dead. If these numbers hold, the strike was an unqualified success.
Reactions. Nothing loud or threatening. No one is actually upset. Russian relations might be icy, but nothing unexpected. Rootin' Tootin' Putin isn't a trustworthy type anyway..
As of 0145 hrs, 3 Syrian soldiers dead. No Russians dead. If these numbers hold, the strike was an unqualified success.
as relevant today as it ever was...
[youtube]mzddAYYDZkk&index=8&list=PLZbXA4lyCtqofD2-h3xInLvQuYcFUHvTB[/youtube]
[youtube]mzddAYYDZkk&index=8&list=PLZbXA4lyCtqofD2-h3xInLvQuYcFUHvTB[/youtube]
Pffft. Just some dust in the wind compared to the 26,000+ bombs and cruise missiles that the good ol' Peace Prize recipient dropped in his last year alone.
I guess Obama never heard the saying, "Bombing for peace is like f*cking for virginity". :lol:
Not strong words.
Russian lawmakers claim it's 'a pity' that President Trump ordered attacks on Syrian airfield
The U.S. attacking Syrian government targets will "undercut" efforts to fight terrorism during the country’s long-running civil war, according to senior Russian lawmakers.
Countries around the world reacted to the unilateral attack on the Bashar Assad regime in retaliation for its alleged role in chemical attacks that killed dozens of civilians earlier this week.
Russian lawmakers call U.S. attacks on Syrian airfield 'a pity' - NY Daily News
Russian lawmakers claim it's 'a pity' that President Trump ordered attacks on Syrian airfield
The U.S. attacking Syrian government targets will "undercut" efforts to fight terrorism during the country’s long-running civil war, according to senior Russian lawmakers.
Countries around the world reacted to the unilateral attack on the Bashar Assad regime in retaliation for its alleged role in chemical attacks that killed dozens of civilians earlier this week.
Russian lawmakers call U.S. attacks on Syrian airfield 'a pity' - NY Daily News
I'm not much of a Trump fan.. but after the Syrian Gov't did a Gas attack and killed women and Children..
I have to give Trump kudos on doing the military strike.
However, I think he should have targeted Bashar al-Assad's home
I have to give Trump kudos on doing the military strike.
However, I think he should have targeted Bashar al-Assad's home
I think that it was the right thing to do.
Hopefully, the use of chemical wpns is stopped. In the short run, it's back to conventional wpns, should Syria continue to bomb their own. Not fantastically better, but a step in the right direction.
For the rest of the world, the chess game begins. Does Russia change its policy in the ME? Is the US strike going to motivate the region to stop or slow the fighting? Will Assad hold on to power, or will he go out in a blaze of glory, taking whoever gets in his way with him? What about China?
Lots of interesting things to watch over the coming weeks.
Hopefully, the use of chemical wpns is stopped. In the short run, it's back to conventional wpns, should Syria continue to bomb their own. Not fantastically better, but a step in the right direction.
For the rest of the world, the chess game begins. Does Russia change its policy in the ME? Is the US strike going to motivate the region to stop or slow the fighting? Will Assad hold on to power, or will he go out in a blaze of glory, taking whoever gets in his way with him? What about China?
Lots of interesting things to watch over the coming weeks.
We're going to see the various countries scrambling now. Support for the US action is being well received by the world.
Some reports coming in that the Russians did not use their missile defense system when the Tomahawks were coming in. This suggests that they chose to stay out of everything. That came from CNN. If this is the case, it would explain why the official response from the Kremlin was soft.
Syrians have announced six killed as a result of the strike.
I will be interested to see the satellite photos of how the strike went. A very efficient mission.
Some reports coming in that the Russians did not use their missile defense system when the Tomahawks were coming in. This suggests that they chose to stay out of everything. That came from CNN. If this is the case, it would explain why the official response from the Kremlin was soft.
Syrians have announced six killed as a result of the strike.
I will be interested to see the satellite photos of how the strike went. A very efficient mission.
Last edited:
better then you
make that MUCH better then you
the whole alt news world that has been right all along sees it that way if you look
...and just for example on election interference from the right in front of your nose file:
Jewish donors prominent in presidential campaign contributions
Sheldon Adelson is biggest giver of all; Obama’s top two donors also Jewish
http://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-donors-prominent-in-presidential-campaign-contributions/
and you all are worried about the nonexistant russian interference in the US election
pretty funny
you really don't don't know whats going and don't want to know
makes you a great opinion not to take too
enjoy yourself
make that MUCH better then you
the whole alt news world that has been right all along sees it that way if you look
...and just for example on election interference from the right in front of your nose file:
Jewish donors prominent in presidential campaign contributions
Sheldon Adelson is biggest giver of all; Obama’s top two donors also Jewish
http://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-donors-prominent-in-presidential-campaign-contributions/
and you all are worried about the nonexistant russian interference in the US election
pretty funny
It hurts doesn't it, Cliffy?
you really don't don't know whats going and don't want to know
makes you a great opinion not to take too
enjoy yourself
Last edited:
Al Jazeera isn't always the best source of news, but I know that many folks do not check it. Here is a link for them. You can read some of the official responses to the US air strike. There are also links to Syria's reaction, others. Fun to read.
Syrian National Coalition hails US strike on Homs base | Syria News | Al Jazeera
Syrian National Coalition hails US strike on Homs base | Syria News | Al Jazeera