Sixth Annual Israeli Apartheid Week

Are all human being entitled to fundamental human rights?

  • Yes, all people are entitled to food, clothing, shelter, medicine...

    Votes: 11 64.7%
  • No, only some people are entitled to human rights.

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Palestinians don't qualify as human beings.

    Votes: 5 29.4%

  • Total voters
    17

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
The overwhelming and conclusive evidence is available at the sites I referenced in my last post. Those of you dismissing it probably didn't read it.

Recently the Canadian government made this timid statement:

...Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said Canada firmly believes in two sovereign states living side by side and that it takes a dim view of Israel's expansion plans. "We feel this is contrary to international law and therefore condemn it," he told MPs on the Commons foreign affairs meeting. "We're very concerned with what is taking place."...


Canada condemns Israel’s expansion plans | Canada | News | Toronto Sun


Not much but its a step in the right direction
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The overwhelming and conclusive evidence is available at the sites I referenced in my last post.
Which I have previously addressed, just because you ignore, does not negate it. It just proves you are what you appear to be. A bigoted coward.

Those of you dismissing it probably didn't read it.
As usual, you operate on assumptions and base your opinions on half the facts.

If you were remotely objective, you wouldn't use such ignorant commentary without proof.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
The overwhelming majority of nations are wrong, as are you.

what other nation, besides Israel, drops leaflets warning the people to take cover before a retaliatory attack???

RESTRAINT is the Israeli order of the day.........RESTRAINT was used in Gaza in January 1009. That is obvious by the casualty figures......and trying to track every round fired, every artillery shell used, every missile launched is idiotic. The overall essence of the mission was restraint.

Had Israel pulled out the stops, there would be few Arabs in Gaza.......the survivors would have fled across the border into Egypt.......all you and the Jew-hating UN are achieving is pushing Israel to abandon restraint...I mean, really, why bother?????

The evidence does not support your opinion. You'd know that if you actually read the Goldstone Report and followed the links to the evidence. But you aren't interested in facts which contradict your misperceptions about Israel.

For those of you who are interested in knowing the truth:

On Nov. 4, 2008 Israel violently and deliberately broke their ceasefire agreement. Israel never respected their ceasefire obligations from the beginning since they continued to block humanitarian food and medical aid from reaching hungry and sick Gazans. But their attack on the same day Barack Obama was elected President indicates that they chose to violate the ceasefire on a day they knew the world's attention would be elsewhere.

An Unnecessary War: Washington Post Op-Ed

By Jimmy Carter

Jan. 8, 2009

....We knew that the 1.5 million inhabitants of Gaza were being starved, as the U.N. special rapporteur on the right to food had found that acute malnutrition in Gaza was on the same scale as in the poorest nations in the southern Sahara, with more than half of all Palestinian families eating only one meal a day.

Palestinian leaders from Gaza were noncommittal on all issues, claiming that rockets were the only way to respond to their imprisonment and to dramatize their humanitarian plight. The top Hamas leaders in Damascus, however, agreed to consider a cease-fire in Gaza only, provided Israel would not attack Gaza and would permit normal humanitarian supplies to be delivered to Palestinian citizens....

...this fragile truce was partially broken on Nov. 4, when Israel launched an attack in Gaza to destroy a defensive tunnel being dug by Hamas inside the wall that encloses Gaza...
Jimmy Carter Editorial: An Unnecessary War
The reason why Israel's leaders wanted a fight had to do with the Israel's 2009 general election. Israel war hawks were hammering the Barak government over their failed 2006 Lebanon invasion. The government needed to demonstate a military victory before the elections of face a humiliating defeat.

...Analysts, and some politicians, argue that the real motivation behind the military operation is ambitious Israeli politicians and the upcoming Israeli elections due Feb. 10.

During heated debates in the Israeli Knesset, or parliament, Israeli-Arab Knesset Members (MKs) accused the Israeli government of waging a war for electioneering purposes...

MIDEAST: Gaza Becomes a Chessboard for Israeli Leaders - IPS ipsnews.net
Effectively, the death and destruction was motivated by political opportunism.

Israel's initial bombing campaign destroyed mostly civilian targets (firehalls, hostpitals, police stations, schools, universities, government buildings, water and sewage treatment facilities....)

...The International Committee of the Red Cross - guardian of the Geneva Conventions on which international humanitarian law is based - defines a combatant as a person "directly engaged in hostilities"....

...The first wave of bombings, which targeted police stations across Gaza, is a key case in question - particularly the strike that killed at least 40 trainees on parade.

Analysts say Hamas policemen are responsible for quashing dissent and rooting out spies, as well as tackling crime and directing traffic.

But the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem, which has raised the issue in a letter to Israel’s attorney general, says it appears those killed were being trained in first aid, human rights and maintaining public order...

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Gaza conflict: Who is a civilian?
More here:
Gaza war crimes investigation: Guardian uncovers evidence of alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza | World news | guardian.co.uk

and in this Amnesty International report:

...The current conflict in Gaza is one in which civilians are overwhelmingly the victims of the hostilities. Of some 900 killed in the first 17 days, more than one third were civilians taking no direct part in hostilities, including more than 200 children. Israeli officials have denied deliberately targeting civilians, but they have launched attacks on civilians and civilian objects, including essential infrastructure, without a convincing explanation of why the objects they have attacked could be making an effective contribution to military action.

Israeli forces have bombed buildings that serve no military purposes such as civilian government ministries and the parliament. They attacked civilian police, killing more than 150.

Other presumptively civilian buildings have been attacked such as mosques, schools, media outlets and homes. Israel has justified such attacks by claiming that these ostensibly civilian objects were actually being used for military purposes: either for storing or producing ammunition, rockets and other weapons; as command and control centres; housing Hamas fighters; that Hamas military commanders were present or that the buildings were being used to fire at Israeli forces or into Israeli towns. But in many cases, no evidence has been provided to support such assertions. Any investigation into serious violations in this conflict will need to be able to examine the basis on which Israeli forces determined that such normally civilian buildings were being used for military purposes.

In less than two days, on 9 and 10 January 2009, Israeli forces attacked the homes of three journalists and a building in which several media outlets were based. One journalist, Ala’ Murtaja, was killed on 9 January while he was broadcasting his radio programme from his home. The same day another journalist, Ihab al-Wahidi, was killed together with his mother-in-law in an attack on the home of his wife’s parents. On 10 January journalist Samir Khalifa escaped unscathed after a tank shell struck his family home. Israeli forces have not explained why these homes and buildings were attacked.

Israel has extensively bombed public civilian infrastructure which, coupled with the prolonged blockade, has caused the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe. It also raises the strong possibility that Israel may have violated the prohibition against targeting objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population (Article 54(2) of Additional Protocol I)....

Document - Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territories: The conflict in Gaza: A briefing on applicable law, investigations and accountability | Amnesty International
Deliberately attacking civilians is a war crime.


When Israeli ground forces finally entered the bombed out ruins of Gaza, they encountered no resistance. All the militants had gone into hiding.

But that didn't stop the Israeli military from continuing to commit war crimes like abducting civilians (including women and children) and using them to shield Israeli command posts, tank and artillery positions, sniper positions. The Israeli military also abducted civilians including women and children in order to get them to clear buildings of mines and booby traps.

According to Israeli soldiers returning from Gaza, the Israel military's use of Palestinians civilians as human shields as described above is standard operating procedure.

Israeli soldiers describe destroying civilian targets for fun and out of boredom. They also describe Israeli soldiers deliberately murdering innocent unarmed civilians including women and children out of malice, hate and sadistic cruelty.

You should be able to relate to their sadistic cruelty Colpy, as your comments indicate you can't wait for the Israeli's to start slaughtering Palestinian civilians again.

If you have trouble believing any soldiers would do these things, you can read their testimony here:

Breaking the Silence
Breaking The Silence - Israeli soldiers talk about the occupied territories


Denying Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity is the same as deny other crimes against humanity and war crimes. Its no different in principle from denying the Holocaust.
 
Last edited:

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The evidence does not support your opinion.
Yes it does, just because you're ignorant to the fact, turn a blind eye to reality, doesn't make us wrong.

A 22 day offensive on the scale and magnitude of Cast Lead, with a body count of 1400, the bulk of which are combatants, is a monumental example of restrained precision military action.

You'd know that if you actually read the Goldstone Report and followed the links to the evidence.
You'd know that, if you didn't believe every piece of propaganda that someone spoon feeds you.
But you aren't interested in facts which contradict your misperceptions about Israel.
This is you in a nut shell.

For those of you who are interested in knowing the truth:
Which excludes you.

On Nov. 4, 2008 Israel violently and deliberately broke their ceasefire agreement.

The reason why Israel's leaders wanted a fight had to do with the Israel's 2009 general election. Israel war hawks were hammering the Barak government over their failed 2006 Lebanon invasion. The government needed to demonstate a military victory before the elections of face a humiliating defeat.


Effectively, the death and destruction was motivated by political opportunism.

Israel's initial bombing campaign destroyed mostly civilian targets (firehalls, hostpitals, police stations, schools, universities, government buildings, water and sewage treatment facilities....)
Complete nonsense.

More here:
Gaza war crimes investigation: Guardian uncovers evidence of alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza | World news | guardian.co.uk

When Israeli ground forces finally entered the bombed out ruins of Gaza, they encountered no resistance. All the militants had gone into hiding.
This is contradicted by your own report...:lol:
Denying Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity is the same as deny other crimes against humanity and war crimes. Its no different in principle from denying the Holocaust.
:lol:
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
The evidence does not support your opinion. You'd know that if you actually read the Goldstone Report and followed the links to the evidence. But you aren't interested in facts which contradict your misperceptions about Israel.

For those of you who are interested in knowing the truth:

On Nov. 4, 2008 Israel violently and deliberately broke their ceasefire agreement. Israel never respected their ceasefire obligations from the beginning since they continued to block humanitarian food and medical aid from reaching hungry and sick Gazans. But their attack on the same day Barack Obama was elected President indicates that they chose to violate the ceasefire on a day they knew the world's attention would be elsewhere.

The reason why Israel's leaders wanted a fight had to do with the Israel's 2009 general election. Israel war hawks were hammering the Barak government over their failed 2006 Lebanon invasion. The government needed to demonstate a military victory before the elections of face a humiliating defeat.

Effectively, the death and destruction was motivated by political opportunism.

Israel's initial bombing campaign destroyed mostly civilian targets (firehalls, hostpitals, police stations, schools, universities, government buildings, water and sewage treatment facilities....)



and in this Amnesty International report:

Deliberately attacking civilians is a war crime.


When Israeli ground forces finally entered the bombed out ruins of Gaza, they encountered no resistance. All the militants had gone into hiding.

But that didn't stop the Israeli military from continuing to commit war crimes like abducting civilians (including women and children) and using them to shield Israeli command posts, tank and artillery positions, sniper positions. The Israeli military also abducted civilians including women and children in order to get them to clear buildings of mines and booby traps.

According to Israeli soldiers returning from Gaza, the Israel military's use of Palestinians civilians as human shields as described above is standard operating procedure.

Israeli soldiers describe destroying civilian targets for fun and out of boredom. They also describe Israeli soldiers deliberately murdering innocent unarmed civilians including women and children out of malice, hate and sadistic cruelty.

You should be able to relate to their sadistic cruelty Colpy, as your comments indicate you can't wait for the Israeli's to start slaughtering Palestinian civilians again.

If you have trouble believing any soldiers would do these things, you can read their testimony here:

Breaking the Silence


Denying Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity is the same as deny other crimes against humanity and war crimes. Its no different in principle from denying the Holocaust.

Ahhhhh.....if you trust the UN in anything, I advise you to move to Srebrenica........life is a learning experience.

Jimmy Carter is an idiot that should have stuck to building houses for the homeless. Just ask the Koreans.

Perhaps you should talk about Hamas using the population as a shield....it would be a refreshing change.

The Guardian might as well be the mouthpiece of Hezbollah.......

And moving against an iniment attack is not breaking a cease-fire.....

I suppose you think the two Israeli soldiers killed recently in a Hamas ambush were violating the Palestinians' right to target-practise by soaking up their bullets...:roll:
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
And moving against an iniment attack is not breaking a cease-fire.....

I suppose you think the two Israeli soldiers killed recently in a Hamas ambush were violating the Palestinians' right to target-practise by soaking up their bullets...:roll:
The failed to show that and they were on the wrong side of the fence. If they has stayed own their side they would be alive today.
Hamas releases video of deadly Gaza clash - Israel News, Ynetnews
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Heres what I know about Israel. 99% of the people in Canada who oppose Israel are a bunch of hypocrites.

If you think Israel and its very being is wrong, go renounce your citizenship..go down to the local reserve and sign over all of your property built on stolen land, and then try to figure out which country (if you can even narrow it down to one) you should be deported to. If I had to guess for me I'd say the Netherlands, but Ireland is a strong contender too.

Hundreds slaughtered by the Lord's army in Africa, narry a word. But homes are built in east jerusalem and BAM. Because I guess in a two state palestinian solution all the jews are forced out..even though Jerusalem (including east Jeruslem) was majority jewish before Israel began existing. Which says something, Palestine will have a "No Jews" sign..even though Jews have every right to live in any Palestinian state. But we all know that would never come to pass. Besides, the Palestinians only claim to east jerusalem is that they illegally occupied it for 20 years, Jerusalem (east and west) is a seperate state from both Israel and any future Palestine.

But its not about human rights, hell EAO is still trying to label white phosphourous as a chemical weapon. Being a chemical is not a chemical weapon, technically bullets and rockets (from both sides) would be chemical weapons under that grounds. WP is an incindiary, it kills by burning not poisoning. But you don't truly care, when blacks, asians or central americans die you don't care. You only care if Jews can be blamed and its getting tiring.

Do you know how many people died in Mexico during the same period? The place is a warzone, what about Africa? what about South-east Asia? Silence.

And your silence tells volumes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just the Facts

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Regarding human shields
...Several independent human rights agencies documents incidents where Israeli soldiers fired on civilians with small arms during Israel’s major military operations in Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009.


Human Rights Watch (HRW) alone documents seven incidents where these attacks killed 11 civilians—including five women and four children—and wounded at least another eight.


While we appreciate the effort done by (HRW) documenting the phenomena called (white flag death), we need to emphasize that the casualties documented comprise a small fraction of the Palestinian civilians killed and wounded during what Israel called Operation Cast Lead.


In each case documented, the victims were standing, walking, or in a slowly moving vehicle with other unarmed civilians who were trying to convey their noncombatant status by waving a white flag. All available evidence indicates that Israeli forces had control of the areas in question, no fighting was taking place there at the time, and Palestinian fighters were not hiding among the civilians who were shot.


Whether waving a white flag or not, these people were civilians not taking an active part in hostilities, and therefore should not have been attacked, according to international humanitarian law (the laws of war).


In each of these incidents, the evidence strongly indicates that, at the least, Israeli soldiers failed to take feasible precautions to distinguish between civilians and combatants before carrying out the attack. At worst, the soldiers deliberately fired on persons known to be civilians.


Under the laws of war, parties to an armed conflict must take all feasible measures to distinguish between civilians and combatants, and they may target only combatants.


The laws of war also oblige states to conduct impartial investigations into credible allegations of serious laws-of-war violations, and to hold accountable anyone found responsible for war crimes, regardless of rank.


To date, however, the Israeli government and IDF have failed to conduct serious investigations into many of the credible allegations of laws-of-war violations by Israeli forces during Operation Cast Lead. When Israeli soldiers who fought in the operation spoke publicly about attacks on civilians and other violations, the IDF dismissed their claims as hearsay and exaggerations, and criticized the soldiers for speaking out!?.


In the killings documented by (HRW) report, Human Rights Watch found no evidence that the civilian victims were used by Palestinian fighters as human shields or were shot in the crossfire between opposing forces.


In July, the organization breaking the Silence, composed of veteran Israeli soldiers, published the testimonies of 26 unnamed reserve and regular combat soldiers who had participated in Operation Cast Lead. The testimonies indicate wrongdoing for civilian deaths during the Gaza fighting....


http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/74F6C9876B0DFF28852576DB0056D8F5



The Goldstone Report found no evidence supporting Israeli claims that Palestinian militant groups used civilians as human shields. Israeli claims are based on their belief that when they bomb cities, the civilians deaths are the result of their being used as human shields, which is ridiculous.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Regarding human shields



The Goldstone Report found no evidence supporting Israeli claims that Palestinian militant groups used civilians as human shields. Israeli claims are based on their belief that when they bomb cities, the civilians deaths are the result of their being used as human shields, which is ridiculous.

Actually, no ..its not. Military forces are not supposed to assemble in civilian areas. If military forces assemble near civilians it is the defending forces fault for any civilian casualties.

It is not the attackers duty to ensure they have laser guided smart missiles before attacking ,especially as such weapons did not exist when the rules were written and most nations do not have that capability even now.

So yes, if Hamas sets up shop two blocks down from a school and the school gets hit by an artillery round, that is Hamas fault being inside of an active city. Thats why armies put on uniforms and only wage guerrilla warfare from the countryside. If there is no countryside then they can fight in the open or evacuate civilians from combat areas. If that causes them to lose, STBY, the rules of war are not written to make it so you can't lose or that fighting is easier.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Heres what I know about Israel. 99% of the people in Canada who oppose Israel are a bunch of hypocrites.

If you think Israel and its very being is wrong, go renounce your citizenship..go down to the local reserve and sign over all of your property built on stolen land, and then try to figure out which country (if you can even narrow it down to one) you should be deported to. If I had to guess for me I'd say the Netherlands, but Ireland is a strong contender too.

Hundreds slaughtered by the Lord's army in Africa, narry a word. But homes are built in east jerusalem and BAM. Because I guess in a two state palestinian solution all the jews are forced out..even though Jerusalem (including east Jeruslem) was majority jewish before Israel began existing. Which says something, Palestine will have a "No Jews" sign..even though Jews have every right to live in any Palestinian state. But we all know that would never come to pass. Besides, the Palestinians only claim to east jerusalem is that they illegally occupied it for 20 years, Jerusalem (east and west) is a seperate state from both Israel and any future Palestine.

But its not about human rights, hell EAO is still trying to label white phosphourous as a chemical weapon. Being a chemical is not a chemical weapon, technically bullets and rockets (from both sides) would be chemical weapons under that grounds. WP is an incindiary, it kills by burning not poisoning. But you don't truly care, when blacks, asians or central americans die you don't care. You only care if Jews can be blamed and its getting tiring.

Do you know how many people died in Mexico during the same period? The place is a warzone, what about Africa? what about South-east Asia? Silence.

And your silence tells volumes.

Historically Canada was just as guilty as Israel is today regarding colonization and ethnic cleansing. In Canada, we are still coming to terms with these historical injustices. Meanwhile Israel is doing now to Palestinians what Europeans used do to First Nations people over a century ago... and a lot worse.

First Nations people are full Canadian citizens, unlike Palestinians who have limited to no rights or citizenship. First Nations people have a few additional rights, the rest of us don't have. Canada has signed treaties with most first nations and we are in the middle of peaceful negotiations on the remainder. Unlike Israel, Canada doesn't drop chemical weapons on First Nations people. We don't abduct their children and use them as human shields. Presently, Canada does not commit war crimes or crimes against humanity regarding our first nation citizens.

As far as silence on other war crimes and crimes against humanity is concerned. I assume that you only support Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity, not war crimes in general. But, if you start a thread supporting war crimes and crimes against humanity, I'll post rebuttals condemning those war crimes and crimes against humanity the same way I post rebuttals against Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity.

BTW, welcome back Z. You were gone for a while. The quality of posts in Israel's defense has gone down during your absence. Read through this string and you'll see the posts by Israeli apologists consists mostly of pathetic name calling and slander.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Actually, no ..its not. Military forces are not supposed to assemble in civilian areas. If military forces assemble near civilians it is the defending forces fault for any civilian casualties.

It is not the attackers duty to ensure they have laser guided smart missiles before attacking ,especially as such weapons did not exist when the rules were written and most nations do not have that capability even now.

So yes, if Hamas sets up shop two blocks down from a school and the school gets hit by an artillery round, that is Hamas fault being inside of an active city. Thats why armies put on uniforms and only wage guerrilla warfare from the countryside. If there is no countryside then they can fight in the open or evacuate civilians from combat areas. If that causes them to lose, STBY, the rules of war are not written to make it so you can't lose or that fighting is easier.

You are obviously unaware of the basis of the charges. Collateral damage related to Israel's targeting of legitimate military targets is not a war crime.

Deliberately attacking a hospitals, ambulances, aid convoys, schools, fire stations and other civilian buildings while they are full of civilians is a war crime.

Herding unarmed civilians (including women and children) into a building and then bombing it, is a war crime.

Abducting unarmed civilians including children and putting them in pits next to tanks and artillery as they shell the children's relatives.... is a war crime.

These actions and others are war crimes. You should read the report at least so that you understand the charges. If you don't believe what you read, then look at the evidence...
United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza conflict
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I suppose you think the two Israeli soldiers killed recently in a Hamas ambush were violating the Palestinians' right to target-practise by soaking up their bullets...:roll:


Heres what I know about Israel. 99% of the people in Canada who oppose Israel are a bunch of hypocrites.

If you think Israel and its very being is wrong, go renounce your citizenship..go down to the local reserve and sign over all of your property built on stolen land, and then try to figure out which country (if you can even narrow it down to one) you should be deported to. If I had to guess for me I'd say the Netherlands, but Ireland is a strong contender too.

Hundreds slaughtered by the Lord's army in Africa, narry a word. But homes are built in east jerusalem and BAM. Because I guess in a two state palestinian solution all the jews are forced out..even though Jerusalem (including east Jeruslem) was majority jewish before Israel began existing. Which says something, Palestine will have a "No Jews" sign..even though Jews have every right to live in any Palestinian state. But we all know that would never come to pass. Besides, the Palestinians only claim to east jerusalem is that they illegally occupied it for 20 years, Jerusalem (east and west) is a seperate state from both Israel and any future Palestine.

But its not about human rights, hell EAO is still trying to label white phosphourous as a chemical weapon. Being a chemical is not a chemical weapon, technically bullets and rockets (from both sides) would be chemical weapons under that grounds. WP is an incindiary, it kills by burning not poisoning. But you don't truly care, when blacks, asians or central americans die you don't care. You only care if Jews can be blamed and its getting tiring.

Do you know how many people died in Mexico during the same period? The place is a warzone, what about Africa? what about South-east Asia? Silence.
Well said, it bears repeating and will likely be dismissed by those that hate Jews.

And your silence tells volumes.
BINGO!!!

Regarding human shields

The Goldstone Report found no evidence supporting Israeli claims that Palestinian militant groups used civilians as human shields. Israeli claims are based on their belief that when they bomb cities, the civilians deaths are the result of their being used as human shields, which is ridiculous.
No, Israeli claims are based on being fired upon from Mosques, Hospitals, homes and witnessing armed combatants entering and exiting Ambulances.

Now, had you actually read the report you tout as gospel. You would not make such supercilious claims. Because even in your own report, when Rabbo, a senior member with the PA intelligence agency was captured at his home (Which of the Goldstone report erroneously chalked up as an attack on a civilian), he stated that he was forced to allocate the other Hamas militants in his neighbourhood. He, and I quote...

1043. He approached HS/08’s house from the street. The entrance was destroyed and blocked by rubble. He went back to the officer and told him that he could not get in. The officer told him to go through the roof instead. He went into his own house, which he found empty, except for a soldier. This reinforced his anxiety about the fate of his family. At this point, there was no major damage to his house. He crossed the roof and went down the stairs into HS/08’s house. He was scared that the fighters would shoot at him and shouted, “I am a Palestinian, a neighbour. I am being forced to come into this house.” In a room at the bottom of the stairs he found three armed young men wearing military camouflage and headbands of al-Qassam Brigades. They pointed their weapons at him. He told them that the Israeli soldiers thought that they had been killed and had sent him to check. He said that he was helpless as the soldiers had taken his wife and children. The armed men told him that they had seen everything, and asked him to go back to the soldiers and tell them what he had seen.

1044. He went back outside, again crossing over the roof of his house. As he approached the soldiers, they pointed their weapons at him and ordered him to stop, strip naked and turn around. After he dressed again, he told them what he had seen. Initially, the soldiers did not believe him. They asked how he knew that they were Hamas militants and he explained about their headbands. The soldiers asked about their weapons. He replied that they were carrying Kalashnikovs. The officer told him that, if he was lying, he would be shot dead.
But Goldstone and yourself, have determined that Hamas was not using residential areas to hide in, thus using civilians as shields and placing them in great danger.

This is but one piece of faulty or inconsistent findings.

Have you even read the report eao?

unlike Palestinians who have limited to no rights or citizenship.
Citizenship to where?

First Nations people have a few additional rights, the rest of us don't have.
Like what?

Unlike Israel, Canada doesn't drop chemical weapons on First Nations people.
Really? Care to discuss the Arctic? Ipperwash? At that is but two. Don't get me started on the mercury poisoning in Quebec.

We don't abduct their children and use them as human shields.
Really? Do you know the last time a child was taken by CAS, and to what end that event came to?
Presently, Canada does not commit war crimes or crimes against humanity regarding our first nation citizens.
Really? How's the water in your home town?

As far as silence on other war crimes and crimes against humanity is concerned. I assume that you only support Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity, not war crimes in general. But, if you start a thread supporting war crimes and crimes against humanity, I'll post rebuttals condemning those war crimes and crimes against humanity the same way I post rebuttals against Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity.
But you need no provocation to start hating Jews?

BTW, welcome back Z. You were gone for a while. The quality of posts in Israel's defense has gone down during your absence.
Yes, because we have lowered ourselves to your level. We've tried to reason with you, because you dismiss anything that doesn't support your ideology, you failed. We tried explaining how military operations unfold, you ignored it, you failed. We've tried countless times to expose inconsistency, lies, half truths and misconceptions, you dismiss, ignore or both, you failed.

Us, the opposition on the other hand, have a readily admit that Israel Soldiers have broken tenets of the Law of Armed conflict. Has disproportionately retaliated against Hamas, and finally, we recognize that there is equal culpability on both sides.

Yes eao, you're quite right, you have lower the level of debate to you merely parroting others opinions, incessantly and without any real thought applied by yourself. If you wish to be elevated in out opinions, and not be treated with such contempt, that might I suggest you give us the same courtesy we give you. Use objectivity and examine all the evidence brought forth.

If not, you will be held in your present capacity as a hypocrite of the highest order, a terrorist supporter, and a bigot.

Read through this string and you'll see the posts by Israeli apologists consists mostly of pathetic name calling and slander.
I can prove my assertions, can you?

Actually, no ..its not. Military forces are not supposed to assemble in civilian areas. If military forces assemble near civilians it is the defending forces fault for any civilian casualties.

It is not the attackers duty to ensure they have laser guided smart missiles before attacking ,especially as such weapons did not exist when the rules were written and most nations do not have that capability even now.

So yes, if Hamas sets up shop two blocks down from a school and the school gets hit by an artillery round, that is Hamas fault being inside of an active city. Thats why armies put on uniforms and only wage guerrilla warfare from the countryside. If there is no countryside then they can fight in the open or evacuate civilians from combat areas. If that causes them to lose, STBY, the rules of war are not written to make it so you can't lose or that fighting is easier.
How true, which I have proven in the post, they most certainly did. Though the terrorist supporters just can't understand.

You are obviously unaware of the basis of the charges. Collateral damage related to Israel's targeting of legitimate military targets is not a war crime.

Deliberately attacking a hospitals, ambulances, aid convoys, schools, fire stations and other civilian buildings while they are full of civilians is a war crime.
Not if Hamas is using them as shields.

Herding unarmed civilians (including women and children) into a building and then bombing it, is a war crime.
And if Israel had actually done that, the death toll would have been far far higher. Only a moron couldn't deduce that.

Abducting unarmed civilians including children and putting them in pits next to tanks and artillery as they shell the children's relatives.... is a war crime.
Again, unproven and the "witnesses" are suspect at best.

These actions and others are war crimes. You should read the report at least so that you understand the charges. If you don't believe what you read, then look at the evidence...
I did, I read the entire report, I found some glaring inconsistencies, which made me shudder. Hell, I didn't even have to research some of the inconsistencies, outside the report itself.

1, Considering Rabbo a civilian. While the report itself identifies him as a PA Intelligence Official. That means under the Laws of Armed conflict, he is not a civilian.
2, Hamas not using civilian areas as shields. In Rabbo's own testimony, Hamas guerillas were hiding in his neighbours home.

There are but two, so glaring inconsistenties. That fly in the face of the tenets of reasonable fact finding. That it throws a shadow over the entire report. Anyone who fails to grasp that, is not being objective. There is no debate about critical thought, you either use it, or you don't. Anyone that believes the Goldstone report outright, is a moron, or is hiding a serious hate for Jews, period.
 
Last edited:

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
And your silence tells volumes.
Just out of boredom, I figured I'd do a little digging.

Seems, out of 114 threads start by eao, 43 are attacks on Israel, some legitimate, but most based are spurious or fallacious conjecture.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
If you think Israel and its very being is wrong, go renounce your citizenship..go down to the local reserve and sign over all of your property built on stolen land, and then try to figure out which country (if you can even narrow it down to one) you should be deported to. If I had to guess for me I'd say the Netherlands, but Ireland is a strong contender too.
They would probably settle for a rent check and possession of all Government buildings in Ottawa and the capitals of the Provinces.
We should have let the Germans keep Europe then.
We should have let Saddam keep Kuwait then.

Do you know how many people died in Mexico during the same period? The place is a warzone, what about Africa? what about South-east Asia? Silence.

How many of them are claiming they have God backing their move
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Just out of boredom, I figured I'd do a little digging.

Seems, out of 114 threads start by eao, 43 are attacks on Israel, some legitimate, but most based are spurious or fallacious conjecture.
You two could always start some thread about those places that nobody here is covering at the moment . Can we start with a list of what the exports are and who gets them and what the imports are and who supplies them?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You two could always start some thread about those places that nobody here is covering at the moment . Can we start with a list of what the exports are and who gets them and what the imports are and who supplies them?
Again, can you please cite the exact section/s of the 4th Convention that Israel is in breach, that you and eao claim, makes Israel responsible of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Can you, or can you not cite this information?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Posted right after you requested it.
No, you cut & pasted almost the entire Convention. Never actually showing which section/s apply and to what event/s, or action/s.

Of which section/s is Israel in breach of and how?
 
Last edited: