None so absurd as the subjective ones forwarded to oust Ford.
You do. It's called election day.
Naah! We know better.....Who cares who the voters picked......
None so absurd as the subjective ones forwarded to oust Ford.
You do. It's called election day.
I agree, but for different reasons.The guy blew it, plain and simple.
Of course I don't believe that. I've never even doubted the video was real, i did doubt it was crack until he admitted it. But even then, there's no evidence that he's a crackhead. His behaviour is as easily explained as being an alcoholic, in over his head, in full panic mode.If you truly believe he stumbled into a crack pipe while blacked out I really don't know what to say.
You have to love the elitist class, lol.Naah! We know better.....Who cares who the voters picked......
So you are against the idea of voters being able to recall the mayor?Naah! We know better.....Who cares who the voters picked......
Why should anyone, including you, have the right to tell voters what why they can and can't be unhappy with their mayor? He works for us, we pay his salary and office budget, if we want him gone, we should have the right to make it happen within a reasonable time frame.None so absurd as the subjective ones forwarded to oust Ford.
You do. It's called election day.
Who are you to force your moral agenda on the voters?Why should anyone, including you, have the right to tell voters what why they can and can't be unhappy with their mayor?
I agree. Have a referendum or call an election.He works for us, we pay his salary and office budget, if we want him gone, we should have the right to make it happen within a reasonable time frame.
Who are you to force your moral agenda on the voters?
I agree. Have a referendum or call an election.
The reasoning you use.I don't see how suggesting that in any way forces anything on the voters.
It is your right to have that opinion, but as you say, you shouldn't be allowed to force that on everyone else.The reasoning you use.
You want to force your moral agenda, which I think is fair clear, is based on your political bent, upon the mayor, and therefore the city.
If a politician is doing his job, I really don't care about his private life, within reason.
But it's ok for you, lol.It is your right to have that opinion, but as you say, you shouldn't be allowed to force that on everyone else.
That's not saying much, hell, I want him out of office now, he's lost his mind. The difference being, I like the honourable, reasoned route, election day.The vast majority want him out of office.
A recall election would be slimy and underhanded?But it's ok for you, lol.
How elitist of you.
That's not saying much, hell, I want him out of office now, he's lost his mind. The difference being, I like the honourable, reasoned route, election day.
I'll leave the slimy underhanded way to the likes of people like you.
Rob Ford is the one who has claimed that he wants "American Style" politics.I think that Rob Ford is sort of a tragedy. He is a people guy, that is why folks still support him, but having seen substance abuse in so many folks I know that eventually the balancing act between the person and the addiction becomes a losing battle. His actions are a testament to the fact that he needs help. The media certainly looks disgusting in all this, making themselves look like TMZ in their reporting, but the fact is that Ford could get off this train at any time.
I agree with Bear that Rob Ford has been dogged since taking office. People who looked down their nose at the fact that a non-elitist, non-environmentalist, non-gay pride activist, non-kiss up, had been handed the keys to City Hall. How dare they? Who are the voters to use democracy to put someone in power that wouldn't donate their office budget to the Leather Ball or throw themself a $10,000 retirement party. So they tried to unseat him by any means possible, including wasting a ton of tax-payers money on the stationary debacle. The fact of the matter is that beyond the fact that Rob Ford has substance abuse issues which led to the poor choices that are now his undoing. He is responsible for those choices, but those on the Left can no longer stand up and say that they do not subscribe to American style politics, nor can they make excuses for the antics and dishonesty of Bill Clinton, because they have now sunk to the level of dirty tricks that they so vehemently opposed.
So you are against the idea of voters being able to recall the mayor?
Why should any politician be completely shielded from public accountability for 4 years? Just because they won an election 3 year ago they can literally sit back and give the finger to the electorate today and we should have no recourse until the full 4 year term is up?
Why should anyone, including you, have the right to tell voters what why they can and can't be unhappy with their mayor? He works for us, we pay his salary and office budget, if we want him gone, we should have the right to make it happen within a reasonable time frame.
So what are you proposing?None of us have a problem with the VOTERS have the ability to fire an elected representative. What we object to is a self appointed special interest group presuming to speak for the electorate.
From our experience with the BC recall system it doesn't seem to work very well and has been subjected to abuse by those seeking political advantage.
Ya, you've said that already, stop being an attention w h ore. you look even more foolish.I don't think Rob Ford is the victim here.
No, the way he's been stripped now.A recall election would be slimy and underhanded?
Fish don't know they're wet either.I really don't get how I am forcing anything on anyone?
Bingo.None of us have a problem with the VOTERS have the ability to fire an elected representative. What we object to is a self appointed special interest group presuming to speak for the electorate.
So what are you proposing?
This is not a left vs right thing. Councillors of all political affiliation voted to remove his powers and budget.
People shouldn't be elected and then have 0 accountability to anyone for 4 years. Kathleen Wyne can be removed as Premier any day if she loses the confidence of the legislature or her party removes her as leader. Right now, any time that the NDP or and PCs want to force an election, they can.
I would love there to be a way to hold a recall election for Ford, but in the absence of that power, there can't just be 0 accountability.
I quit reading this thread when it turned into a schoolyard pissing match.
The guy blew it, plain and simple.
If you truly believe he stumbled into a crack pipe while blacked out I really don't know what to say.
I don't think Rob Ford is the victim here.
I agree, but for different reasons.
Of course I don't believe that. I've never even doubted the video was real, i did doubt it was crack until he admitted it. But even then, there's no evidence that he's a crackhead. His behaviour is as easily explained as being an alcoholic, in over his head, in full panic mode.
You have to love the elitist class, lol.
I think that process is wrong. It should be the voters that decide if he has any power or not. Failing that, he should continue to do what he was elected to do. Now if he is convicted of anything, I believe he is legally required to step down. Until then, council should return to city business such as another fare hike for North America's s-h-i-t-t-iest transet systems. If are recall happens, let it be done by the voters. If you wish to discuss how that is accomplished at a general level, let's do. There are a few councellors which probably should able to be recalled too.
It would have to be the NDP + PCs not or. But right now Andria Martin has her nose too far up Wyn's *** for that to happen.
That hasn't been tested yet.We elect a Mayor and a city council for a reason. The only powers that Ford lost were the ones that are allocated to him by city council, so city council is more than within their rights to reallocate those responsibilities if they see fit.
I'm not saying you, but I find it odd how often I see that touted selectively, lol.City council has a duty to represent their constituents in the best way that they see fit.