Should Ford Resign?

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
True if he went over the 1.75 - and why would they be OK with that. Very important question that goes to how the Voter looks at council.



All Public employees Pensions- Police- Firefighters salaries and their benefits to start.
Contracting out - union get to bid on the contract with a 5-10 % edge built in.

Ford has been quite generous to the police, which is a hefty part of our budget.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Ford wants a Subway vs Light Rail to Scarberia.

Someone has to pay for that........






 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You know, Ford can always tell council where the gravy is if he really wants to help Toronto.

It would be the mayoral thing to do.
There's some in the west end right now, that needs to be derailed.

I bet it won't happen now though, and I bet you just love that... ;-)

Keep digging, your desperation is funny to watch.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,814
467
83
What desperation?

I was completely right.

Extra gravy, hold the facts: Why Rob Ford’s warnings don't add up - The Globe and Mail

Mr. Ford is off base on the issue of the land-transfer tax, too. He promised to do away with it when he campaigned for office in 2010 and, when that proved impossible, said he hoped to trim it by 10 per cent. Now even that has failed to happen and “they assured me that they could do that,” he told reporters.

No one gave any such assurance. To the contrary, officials from Mr. Pennachetti to former budget chief Mike Del Grande have been telling him that the city would have a hard time trimming the tax without cutting city services or raising other taxes to compensate.

Mr. Ford found himself refuted on one final claim. He asserts that he has saved more than a billion dollars since taking office. But to reach that figure he includes $200-million from his decision to kill the vehicle-registration tax. That may have saved taxpayers money, but it represents a cut in the city government’s income, not its spending.