Logic 7 said:
Yes.... Canada is covertly run by Israel, Logic. Israel, by proxy of jewish Canadians also control all our media, which is why you never read favourable stories about your terrorist heroes in the ME.
Should Canada talk to Hezbollah?
- Thread starter sine000
- Start date
Yes.... Canada is covertly run by Israel, Logic. Israel, by proxy of jewish Canadians also control all our media, which is why you never read favourable stories about your terrorist heroes in the ME.
Logic 7 said:
From my understanding the "Islamic Jihad" was part of the groups who integrated with other groups to found this unholy alliance.
Even if what you say is correct it doesn't negate the fact Hezbollah is a known suicide bomb exploiter. They are terrorists. The way for this to stop would be for them to renounce terrorism, lay down their weapons and spend their efforts doing what they claim to be doing; helping people. They could also explicitly support Israel’s right to exist and renounce the government of Iran and cooperate with the Lebanese government.
Israel isn't the problem here.
Jay said:
From my understanding the "Islamic Jihad" was part of the groups who integrated with other groups to found this unholy alliance.
Even if what you say is correct it doesn't negate the fact Hezbollah is a known suicide bomb exploiter. They are terrorists. The way for this to stop would be for them to renounce terrorism, lay down their weapons and spend their efforts doing what they claim to be doing; helping people. They could also explicitly support Israel’s right to exist and renounce the government of Iran and cooperate with the Lebanese government.
Israel isn't the problem here.[/quote]
Islamic jhiad has nothing to do with hezbollah, and no hezbollah isnt a suicide bombers exploiters, unless you have exemple of what you say?
They are ready to accept israel right to exist outside of the disputed territories, and yes they really help the peoples of lebanon, that is a fact.
As long as the west has a deadly and reckless policy towards middle east, radicals would always exist.
Logic 7 said:
Quoted from your wiki link...
"From the inception of the organization to the present [7][5][40] [41][42] the elimination of the state of Israel has been Hezbollah's primary goal. "
""There is no solution to the conflict in this region except with the disappearance of Israel."
So when you say that they accept Israel's right to exist outside of the occupied territories, are you refering to Europe, Canada? From what I have read, Hezbollah will accept nothing less then Israels destruction.
oh quit cherry picking.
******
March 2003
"Our policy is clear, we are fighting in an area that is still under occupation in Lebanon. And beyond that area, we are on the defensive." - Nasrallah
August 2003
Because of Hezbollah’s ability to disrupt a deal between the Israelis and Palestinians, I asked Nasrallah about his view of the renewed talks. He hesitated a moment and declared, “At the end, this is primarily a Palestinian matter. I, like any other person, may consider what is happening to be right or wrong. . . . I may have a different assessment, but at the end of the road no one can go to war on behalf of the Palestinians, even if that one is not in agreement with what the Palestinians agreed on. Of course, it would bother us that Jerusalem goes to Israel.”
I asked, “But if there was a deal?”
“Let it happen,” he answered. “I would not say O.K. I would say nothing.”
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/030728fa_fact
******
now if we had some sort of diplomatic channels open with the social and political wings we could ask him which way it really plays out, couldn't we?
******
March 2003
"Our policy is clear, we are fighting in an area that is still under occupation in Lebanon. And beyond that area, we are on the defensive." - Nasrallah
August 2003
Because of Hezbollah’s ability to disrupt a deal between the Israelis and Palestinians, I asked Nasrallah about his view of the renewed talks. He hesitated a moment and declared, “At the end, this is primarily a Palestinian matter. I, like any other person, may consider what is happening to be right or wrong. . . . I may have a different assessment, but at the end of the road no one can go to war on behalf of the Palestinians, even if that one is not in agreement with what the Palestinians agreed on. Of course, it would bother us that Jerusalem goes to Israel.”
I asked, “But if there was a deal?”
“Let it happen,” he answered. “I would not say O.K. I would say nothing.”
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/030728fa_fact
******
now if we had some sort of diplomatic channels open with the social and political wings we could ask him which way it really plays out, couldn't we?
Jay said:
Not innoncent in all sense of the word, but a very good resistance-militant group,which evolved into a political position , defend their country and help very much their citizen, something the us governement should be shy of, remember katrina?
And you know, the only reason they exist, is because of israelis-governement behavior, nothing less and nothing more.
Re: RE: Should Canada talk to Hezbollah?
But they are giving $15000 dollars to every Lebanon family whose house was bombed...
Graeme said:
But they are giving $15000 dollars to every Lebanon family whose house was bombed...
Re: RE: Should Canada talk to Hezbollah?
The mafia collects (or has collected) taxes in the south of Italy. Real taxes, for the government.
Graeme said:
The mafia collects (or has collected) taxes in the south of Italy. Real taxes, for the government.
Canada should not talk to Hezbollah for the following reasons:
1. Hezbollah is on our list of terrorist organizations, there fore lending Hezbollah support (by recognizing its legitimacy by official communication with them) would be unethical, and border on illegal.
2. Canada is irrelevant in the area anyway.
3. Hezbollah broke the ceasefire by firing rockets at Israeli soldiers within hours of the agreement's implementation. In addition, they are busily re-arming, and have refused any suggestion that they disarm.
Thank God Canada is NOT in the new UN force in south Lebanon......I say that IDIOT Kofi Annan yesterday saying that Hezbollah should not be disarmed by force, only through negotiation. The new UN force will simply be a new layer of "untouchables" for Hezbollah to hide behind...............and sooner or later Israel will have to roll over the UN to get at Hezbollah.
Israel has been completely double-crossed in this cease-fire.
1. Hezbollah is on our list of terrorist organizations, there fore lending Hezbollah support (by recognizing its legitimacy by official communication with them) would be unethical, and border on illegal.
2. Canada is irrelevant in the area anyway.
3. Hezbollah broke the ceasefire by firing rockets at Israeli soldiers within hours of the agreement's implementation. In addition, they are busily re-arming, and have refused any suggestion that they disarm.
Thank God Canada is NOT in the new UN force in south Lebanon......I say that IDIOT Kofi Annan yesterday saying that Hezbollah should not be disarmed by force, only through negotiation. The new UN force will simply be a new layer of "untouchables" for Hezbollah to hide behind...............and sooner or later Israel will have to roll over the UN to get at Hezbollah.
Israel has been completely double-crossed in this cease-fire.
Talk with Hezbullah? Only if we want to completely discredit the legitimate government of Lebanon and accept the results of doing so.
No, Canada will not "talk" with Hezbullah. Hezbullah may have elected members but they are NOT the sole representatives of the people of Lebanon.
No, Canada will not "talk" with Hezbullah. Hezbullah may have elected members but they are NOT the sole representatives of the people of Lebanon.
Re: RE: Should Canada talk to
Hey, BW!
Miss me?
In that case, I guess we shouldn't be talking to Lebanon either.
Oh well.
BitWhys said:
Hey, BW!
Miss me?
In that case, I guess we shouldn't be talking to Lebanon either.
Oh well.