So have you given up on the idea of the death penalty or what?
Because I think having the death penalty is stupid and irrational.
Because I think having the death penalty is stupid and irrational.
Jersay said:So have you given up on the idea of the death penalty or what?
Because I think having the death penalty is stupid and irrational.
Jersay said:Are you crazy, you can have all the DNA testing in the world, and you will not be able to eradicate all doubt of innocence and proof.
Jersay said:I would like to ask you anyway, are you Canadian or American, conservative or liberal. It would answer a lot of questions.
Jersay said:We got rid of the death penalty a while ago buddy, by good old Tommy Douglas, and I see no point in bringing back the death penalty. And I am part of the military!
Jersay said:Didn't work in Britain when they had 250 crimes that had death for them. The judges got so scared about sentencing someone to death, they released murders because they couldn't take a life.
In America, the death penalty doesn't decrease crime. Learn your facts before spouting off!
Polaris75 said:iamcanadian said:If the same number of people were hurt just as bad by a guy swinging a baseball bat whats the difference?
The problem has nothing to do with guns.
The problem absolutely has to do with guns. People are rarely killed by baseball bats. I don't have any facts to back it up, but it's pretty obvious that shooting someone will kill them more often than beating them with a baseball bat.
Polaris75 said:My point was never "it worked in the past", my point is, if you were to impliment it, RIGHT NOW in Canada, all these idiots with illegal firearms who go out and shoot people would think not twice, but three times before taking that gun out to shoot someone, let alone even keeping it if the punishment was death. Don't get me wrong, I know I'm crazy and my ideas would and will never happen, but a death sentence for anyone caught with an illegal firearm would certianly fix our gun-violence problem, at least for the time being. And by "fix", I do not mean eliminate, I mean seriously reduce.
missile said:Commiting a crime with any firearm should be automatic hard time-say 20 years without parole and new prisons should be built in the sub Arctic to cool off these prisoners.
missile said:Commiting a crime with any firearm should be automatic hard time-say 20 years without parole and new prisons should be built in the sub Arctic to cool off these prisoners.
FiveParadox said:How we treat our lowest in society reflects upon us in many ways. I am in favour of harsher penalties for serious and dangerous crimes, insofar as we do not bring our own Government down to the level of those who commit such crimes.
LindzyRae said:The vegitarian opposes the chewing blubber idea, but is is a good one. Just imagin who in their right mind would commit a serious crime knowing they would be sent into a very remot location that (if it gets as cold or colder than T-Bay winters) could regularly get to -40 or colder with the wind chill.
FiveParadox said:How we treat our lowest in society reflects upon us in many ways. I am in favour of harsher penalties for serious and dangerous crimes, insofar as we do not bring our own Government down to the level of those who commit such crimes.
FiveParadox said:Actually, thinking harder on this idea, it does have quite a bit of merit.
(a) "Arctic prisons," for lack of a better term, would mean that in the event of a serious compromise of security, escaped prisoners would have nowhere to go, other than into the cold, unprepared; they'd have to choose between their time in detention, or hypothermia.
(b) These prisons would be quite segregated from the vast majority of the population of Canada. If we could locate any parts of the northern territories that are completely uninhabited, preferably island-like, that would be perfect; the chance of escape, or of security compromises of any other nature, would be extremely low.
However, I can see one main "con" to this endeavour. Citizens of the Territories of Canada may feel somewhat offended if we begin "rerouting" a majority of our dangerous offenders to prisons on their land; it may make the citizens of our Territories feel insecure, and that would have to be addressed before taking any such action, in my opinion.
the caracal kid said:oh boy....
it really is a reflection on society how it handles issues. here we see the old "ship it off" attitude seen in other areas such as waste management. The numbing idea that if you move it far enough away it doesn't really exist. Just think of what could be done with all those prisoners. What would it matter to you? They are no longer around you, so you can forget about them. Or perhaps you would care. Would you consider the gains to society as justification for various treatments? Since hypothermia has been raised aready, do you know where much of the original data on hypothermia in humans came from?
the old "that will teach them" attitude is a very dangerous attutude to take, for it makes you the same as that which you condem while you preach of your loftier ideals and civilized ways.
give me a break.
the caracal kid said:oh boy....
it really is a reflection on society how it handles issues. here we see the old "ship it off" attitude seen in other areas such as waste management. The numbing idea that if you move it far enough away it doesn't really exist. Just think of what could be done with all those prisoners. What would it matter to you? They are no longer around you, so you can forget about them. Or perhaps you would care. Would you consider the gains to society as justification for various treatments? Since hypothermia has been raised aready, do you know where much of the original data on hypothermia in humans came from?
the old "that will teach them" attitude is a very dangerous attutude to take, for it makes you the same as that which you condem while you preach of your loftier ideals and civilized ways.
give me a break.