ftfySorry guys.
sounds a lot more sincere don't you think.
it's better to stop blabbering while you're somewhat ahead son.
p.s. not one member bothered to report your filthy ignorant remark either. not once. just sayin'.

ftfySorry guys.
Sorry guys.
Once and a while I am crude and politically incorrect.
p.s. not one member bothered to report your filthy ignorant remark either. not once. just sayin'.
Or leave another potential victim unaware.
Until she names her attackers, it is just stories....or bullsh-t.....:roll:
hmmm, cause this sort of attitude couldn't possibly be part of the problem...could it?
Is it that hard for men to even conceive of what it might be like to be raped and what that violence can do to a human being? Or is it too hard for men to conceive?
I don't think you can rape a man. Either he won't rise to the occasion or he won't protest.
hmmm, cause this sort of attitude couldn't possibly be part of the problem...could it?
Is it that hard for men to even conceive of what it might be like to be raped and what that violence can do to a human being? Or is it too hard for men to conceive?
What is hard to conceive is a politician keeping these attacks secret for so many years when the assailants were known to her. Maybe she thought going public would destroy her chances of re-election.........a distinct possibility.
hmmm, cause this sort of attitude couldn't possibly be part of the problem...could it?
Is it that hard for men to even conceive of what it might be like to be raped and what that violence can do to a human being? Or is it too hard for men to conceive?
What is hard to conceive is a politician keeping these attacks secret for so many years when the assailants were known to her. Maybe she thought going public would destroy her chances of re-election.........a distinct possibility.
I know two, wonderful, empowered, intelligent women, that have carried the secret of being raped,not once, not twice, but repeatedly for years, their whole lives. Never once seeking justice for the pain it would force them to relive.
It's sad, but it happens. I feel for them.
Or just be young, scared and trapped, but managed to struggle through it, grow, mature and learn to deal with the horror that haunts them from time to time."wonderful", "empowered", "intelligent", Seems to me a woman who has been sexually assaulted repeatedly for years would have to be a saint to remain wonderful, empowered, and intelligent ??through it all.
Sadly this is a hard topic with so many gray areas that it is no wonder that early philosiphers and church leaders promoted abstinence except between married couples .Or just be young, scared and trapped, but managed to struggle through it, grow, mature and learn to deal with the horror that haunts them from time to time.
Just because you've never met one, or maybe you have but never been close enough to them for them to open up to you in some small way, doesn't mean they don't exist.
They do.
Why are you so interested in who her boyfriend was? I'd be more interested in why the fu cking useless pigs that called themselves police wouldn't charge the useless piece of shyte. You, on the other hand, question her because she won't name him now, more than 30 years later, after the police refused to charge him.
If that's the case then how about she identifies the officers as well as the precinct she lodged the complaint with.Something to keep in mind, since the police refused to charge him, she can't very well accuse him at this point without the possibility of getting sued. But what the hell, it's only Sheila Copps, let's make some political hay with this.
What political hay? Sheila Copps is politically irrelevant.oh, and before you deny the "political hay", I figured I'd do some research and found the complete quote concerning the 77 election.
Here's where I stand on it. If she was raped she should name the rapist and the police who ignored her complaint. There is no political gain in this for anyone, but if you think I'm being partisan that's your narrow point of view.Copps entered provincial politics in the 1977 provincial election, running for the Ontario Liberal Party in Hamilton Centre. She lost, finishing fourteen votes behind incumbent New Democrat Mike Davison. Copps appeared on the ballot for this election as "Sheila Copps Miller", using the surname of her then-husband. In all subsequent campaigns, she would refer to herself as "Sheila Copps".
She has stated the rape was by a boyfriend, therefore, she was not married when the rape took place.