The one where one of three gases (CO2 being one of concern) aren't atmosphere reliant and the formula changes with depth and pressure in an ocean that can't compress gases to the point they precipitate as solids on the seafloor?
BTW thanks for voting.
Like methane? That would solve some issues with storage of a volatile gas. HHO is a viable gas if it can be produced where it is to be used, as in a vehicle.
CO2 rises and falls should be dependent on the plants alive and the winds that blow towards them and those that blow away would have different ratios of CO2 and other gases. As an 02 user I would want to live just down wind of a large forest rather than just upwind of it just for a minuscule rise in 02 would be utilized by my body as far as being able to do things that help me survive. If I took some readings down from a pif farm I could claim methane was on the rise.
Science when it is 'projecting' some theory should have two alternatives 'figured our' just in case the weather does not do what you want it to do. The 'wrong version' doesn't get the condemnation from within itself and doing so would cost you your career 'with the boys'. The quickest example is the Japanese looking scientist with the 'look and walk' of a brilliant mind but what he peddles is fully scripted and if he didn't do it somebody would take his place that would do what they are told rather than 'what they know'. When he blames bad data from Tepco being the reason things are 'mysterious' in Japan it is pure fabrication as a 'scientist' would 'know' what happened without ant 'data' from Tepco.
'Blowed-to-fuk' should be a scientific term that even a novice can grasp what it means.
The bogus part that bothers me the most is that 'any change' is a 'big expensive problem' and we have nobody to blame but ourselves (5% of the world living past poverty levels) and the 'cure' is going to be even more expensive than the cause. (which is a natural cycle and once it hits it's 'event horizon' then adaptation is the task. Part of what science should be able to do is predict certain weather patterns happening if the reality swings to one possibility rather than the other most likely case. If global cooling happens over land and the snow piles up the ocean levels will drop and in the (recent past ) last time the level was some 400ft lower than they are today so NY,NY might be drifted in to almost the top of the highest towers but 400 ft below that the weather at the beach is something that Nevada gets in the spring today and the new shore line and higher grows food things quite nicely once the salt is washed away, enough that a larger population can supply their own food and imports are a result of getting something for exports of their surplus. Tractors would be working the Florida keys and the new swampland would be several plateaus below. (an old one if ice-ages happen the same way each of the many times they have happened in the past. The transition into one and out of one could happen quickly (40,000 years) and stay 'stable' for 4X that long, or so.
The one where one of three gases (CO2 being one of concern) aren't atmosphere reliant and the formula changes with depth and pressure in an ocean that can't compress gases to the point they precipitate as solids on the seafloor?
BTW thanks for voting.
I like a cold beer. One chilled with ocean floor carbon dioxide hydrate would be tasty about now.
Please, please tell me you want that filled between 1 atmosphere and 0.8 atmosphere so when you 'pop the top' it isn't 'normal' at 10,000 ft below sea level. (6ft thick glass bottle would be a clue).
I'll have a 4pak of 23% vodka coolers with 3mg CO2 hydrate that is self releasing when said drink is opened and the fizz is added at that time and the temp of the drink gets colder the more you drink of it. Do not swallow any hydrate that is left, switch to 2mg hydrate if this happens often. Drivers can get a less potent mixture.
