sanctus said:
Although their methods may be a bit harsh, it is still wonderful to read that there are still some places that are prepared to deal with people who have chosen to live in an immoral homosexual lifestyle!
Immoral based on what? Your conditioned point of view? Guess what? I have a whole slew of things I personally feel are immoral, wrong as are sins, yet they go along like an everyday part of life for many..... if the world doesn't revolve around how I see it should, why the hell should it be any different for you?
Most of the time those who point their finger at someone else's life and claim they see immorality, those are the people who are trying to cover up or ignore their own everyday actions of immorality and sinfulness, trying to point attention to what they think is worse then what they themselves are doing.
He who is without sin cast the first stone..... and I can pretty well guess there's not a single person in these forums who fit that identity to a tee..... so instead of bitching about other people's lives, how about you deal with your own first.
I wish Canada was as dedicated to preventing the spread of homosexual influence as SA is.
What? By getting our SWAT teams to bust down the doors of people who are having just as much of a good time as most hetros would be? Now there's a great waste of Tax payer's dollars.
Oh and that you're all keen on doing what Saudi Arabia does:
"If muhsan (married, or within a legal concubinage) and free, one must be stoned to death, while a free bachelor must be whipped 100 lashes and banished for a year." Sodomy is thus proven either by the perpetrator confessing four times or by the testimony of four trustworthy Muslim men. If there are less than four witnesses, or one of them is not upright, they are all to be chastised with 80 lashes for slander."
Tell you what: You start using some of the above for those Roman Catholic priests who molested and raped little kids throughout the decades/centuries and then maybe we can talk about other people deserving of those above punishments.
I figure that those who are supposed to be representing God's wishes, plans, and are in a position of such a level of trust, those people should get the worst punishment for abusing those positions.
Disagreeing with Holy Mother Church is not an option for a good Catholic. Doctrines are not open for debate amongst the laity.
Don't you bother to tell me what a "Good Catholic" is and isn't. Last I checked, it's not a competition to get into Heaven.
For those who might believe in a God, do what you think God wants you to do, not what other simpleton humans want you to do. Since we're supposed to be an image of God, then one would think our thoughts and feelings would also be the same as God's, therefore you do what you want to do, and that's what God would want you to do.
Problem solved, everybody go back to your lives