these kids were forcibly removed from there family's for no other reason than that they were Native. They weren't put into foster care, they were shipped off to residential schools where they were punished for speaking their own language. They were "required" to only speak english, convert to christianity, basically they were required to become "white".
So where is the documentation supporting the argument that children were removed from native indian homes only because they were from native indian homes. Were these children attending school on a daily basis, was the response that there were no schools in their neighbourhood? Taht would sound like an invitation to assimilate. Seriously, were children on reserves abiding by the rules of the country, or did they think they could go to school when they felt like it. Why didn't the children attend school? Were their moms not out of bed? When schools were built on the reserve, did they attend?
Whatever the rules of the time were ... were the rules of the time. There was a time when children of another religion could have been eaten by lions, particularly if they had met the Romans, but that didn't happen. Children were provided 3 meals a day, roof over their head, education, medical care, vaccinations, and the basic needs of any child in Canada; a prosperous nation. Of course they had to speak English, as that was part of their education. New immigrants today are not allowed to speak foreign languages in class either. How is that a problem?
As for religious choices, that was the culture of Canada in the 1960s. So what. Even Japanese were expected to convert to Christianity. Guess what, todays politically correct open mindedness about religion ain't retroactive, or at least it shouldn't be.
What the heck is white? Being eductated? having medical care? having a roof over your head? working for a living? reaping what you sow or going hungry? not being allowed to smoke indoors? not building casinos in our backyards? not being free of cigarette taxes?
I mean really ... even first nation murderers are permitted their pow wow rather than face any kind of consequence or court of law - go, run in the field, find yourself, become a man - and then what, they're no longer murderers? Bull. First nations wanted autonomy, they got it and didn't get it right - no new cultural spiriuality. First nations want their own courts and got it, but did it help? Not yet.
Skip the words ... actions speak.