That must be why women like me?
I'm not gonna say it's the flannel but....
it's the flannel.
Money, jewellery all nice....but what we all really want is a man who can keep us warm at minus 30.
That must be why women like me?
Then you'd know your asinine comment about bingos and booze is just that, asinine.Nope. 20 years of working on tundra and in the remote bush.
Something like that. Family moved to Whitehorse when I was 6 months old. Spent the bulk of my life living up North with over 20 years of it flying people and supplies in and out of remote communities, fishing lodges and hunting camps. And yes, I did manage to go fishing once or twice.You? Went fishing up north once or what?
Of course not. Neo-Nazis are never provocative.“I don’t think it is provocative."
Get his lazy azz out there to split some wood and by all means any man that is a man needs to get the fukk up at three in the morning and fill the furnace......while the sweet lady stays toasty in the sack..I'm not gonna say it's the flannel but....
it's the flannel.
Money, jewellery all nice....but what we all really want is a man who can keep us warm at minus 30.
Because if they do that, they'd have to seriously cut back on immigration. For example, in any given year Canada already accepts 10% of the world's refugees who are ready for resettlement. Some years it's been as high as 1 in 6. Last year was even higher than that.Here's a proposal. How bout each country in the EU agree to take in 1/2 of 1% of their population per year for two years, and encourage non-EU countries to do the same? That'd take care of at least 3.5 million over two years.
That's the way it is when you're the client state of a superpower. Sucks to be you.However, in typical American fashion, your proposal is that every one else should help clean up the mess you f*ckers have made, yet again.
That's the way it is when you're the client state of a superpower. Sucks to be you.
Heck, if we're gonna go in and shoot everybody we see with no regard to whether they're military or civilian, wouldn't it be easier to just nuke the Middle East?Here's a novel idea; How about eliminating the cause of the refugee problem?
If the allied forces were sent to eliminate the terrorist groups, (read 'shoot on sight') there wouldn't have to be any refugees.
What is being done now is futile. Troops are sent to fight them but 'don't shoot first' and 'don't cause any civilian deaths', 'don't get into the front lines', etc. won't solve the problem.
Those Mid-easterners whom we are supposed to be training are useless to fight a force like ISIS and most of them are only tomorrow's terrorists anyway.
We send men to do a man's job and restrict his efficiency with 'boy's' rules.
Now you're talkin. GOLDWATER FOR PRESIDENT!. Oh wait. He's dead.Heck, if we're gonna go in and shoot everybody we see with no regard to whether they're military or civilian, wouldn't it be easier to just nuke the Middle East?
You are well-known with the stubbornness, when the prophets warned you, like Prophet Jeremiah in the past.
Because there ain't no murderers nor child molesters in the west.Unfortunately, your so-called "world" is full of murderers and child molesters. My world may not be perfect but I will take it over yours.