Rapporteur David Johnson, Eminent Canadian

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,134
9,053
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
And the obstruction continues
But only until sometime in 2025 unless the NDP/Liberals are re-elected….then it’ll go on for another four more years…

Last week’s column considered the diverting possibility that the Liberals could “lose” the next election but remain in power. That is, they could finish with fewer seats than their Conservative rivals (like both of the last two Federal elections that are under question regarding Chinese Interference) and yet govern with the support of the NDP, as they do now.
In the nearly 20 years since Canada’s conservative movement was unified under its current banner, its support has remained strikingly constant, mired in the low 30s most of the time save for brief intervals around the 2006, 2008 and 2011 elections.

By contrast, Liberal and NDP support, particularly after 2011, has oscillated wildly, as left-of-centre voters hopped back and forth between them (and, latterly, the Greens). That split in the progressive vote offered the Conservatives the occasional opportunity to scrape into government, despite a deficit in the popular vote versus the combined progressive parties of 20 points, on average (15 if only the Liberals and NDP are counted).
1689385850670.jpeg
(consistently similar to the above with minor changes)

That changed with the Liberal-NDP Non-Coalition Coalition that’s definitely not a Coalition…this time. It made explicit what was already implicit: that the progressive vote is no longer the property of the individual parties of which it is composed, but has become a single voting bloc the parties of the left hold in common. The progressive popular majority (since 2004 the Liberals and NDP have averaged a combined 50.4 per cent of the vote) has solidified into a governing majority.
1689387125732.jpeg
…& it only took a Trucker Convoy to get them to come out’a the political closet.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
57,431
7,996
113
Washington DC
Last week’s column considered the diverting possibility that the Liberals could “lose” the next election but remain in power. That is, they could finish with fewer seats than their Conservative rivals (like both of the last two Federal elections that are under question regarding Chinese Interference) and yet govern with the support of the NDP, as they do now.
I thought that was such a central feature of parliamentary democracy that it didn't need to be considered. It's just there, a major feature.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
111,924
12,358
113
Low Earth Orbit
But only until sometime in 2025 unless the NDP/Liberals are re-elected….then it’ll go on for another four more years…

Last week’s column considered the diverting possibility that the Liberals could “lose” the next election but remain in power. That is, they could finish with fewer seats than their Conservative rivals (like both of the last two Federal elections that are under question regarding Chinese Interference) and yet govern with the support of the NDP, as they do now.
In the nearly 20 years since Canada’s conservative movement was unified under its current banner, its support has remained strikingly constant, mired in the low 30s most of the time save for brief intervals around the 2006, 2008 and 2011 elections.

By contrast, Liberal and NDP support, particularly after 2011, has oscillated wildly, as left-of-centre voters hopped back and forth between them (and, latterly, the Greens). That split in the progressive vote offered the Conservatives the occasional opportunity to scrape into government, despite a deficit in the popular vote versus the combined progressive parties of 20 points, on average (15 if only the Liberals and NDP are counted).
View attachment 18737
(consistently similar to the above with minor changes)

That changed with the Liberal-NDP Non-Coalition Coalition that’s definitely not a Coalition…this time. It made explicit what was already implicit: that the progressive vote is no longer the property of the individual parties of which it is composed, but has become a single voting bloc the parties of the left hold in common. The progressive popular majority (since 2004 the Liberals and NDP have averaged a combined 50.4 per cent of the vote) has solidified into a governing majority.
View attachment 18738
…& it only took a Trucker Convoy to get them to come out’a the political closet.
The NDP LPC noncoalition coalition survival requires NDP survival.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,134
9,053
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The NDP LPC noncoalition coalition survival requires NDP survival.
Interesting take. I concur with your assessment of the situation.

With the Bloc only being about what’s in the best interests of Quebec, & the Green Party being about environmental hypocrisy and apparently antisemitism….That leaves three ‘viable’ parties outside of Quebec….& two of them are left of centre or way left of centre so to meet and agree on issues they have to be away from the centre itself…& currently I’m not sure which one is the closest to the centre…

Splitting the vote between the “3” ‘viable’ parties with two of them aligned to the left of centre….even though the two are really actually one….but trying to out ‘left of centre’ each other….ugh….

If the NDP folds or collapses upon itself like the Green Party, that would only leave (outside of Quebec) two ‘viable’ parties for Canadians to choose from. The LPC would have to stand on its own merits and platform without co-opting the votes from the other left of centre party. In its current form, at this point in time, I don’t think it’s capable of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
111,924
12,358
113
Low Earth Orbit
Interesting take. I concur with your assessment of the situation.

With the Bloc only being about what’s in the best interests of Quebec, & the Green Party being about environmental hypocrisy and apparently antisemitism….That leaves three ‘viable’ parties outside of Quebec….& two of them are left of centre or way left of centre so to meet and agree on issues they have to be away from the centre itself…& currently I’m not sure which one is the closest to the centre…

Splitting the vote between the “3” ‘viable’ parties with two of them aligned to the left of centre….even though the two are really actually one….but trying to out ‘left of centre’ each other….ugh….

If the NDP folds or collapses upon itself like the Green Party, that would only leave (outside of Quebec) two ‘viable’ parties for Canadians to choose from. The LPC would have to stand on its own merits and platform without co-opting the votes from the other left of centre party. In its current form, at this point in time, I don’t think it’s capable of that.
People with Green tendencies vote Lib and NDP thinking they are capable of getting shit done. They will revert to Green or not vote at all.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,879
2,576
113
Toronto, ON
Interesting take. I concur with your assessment of the situation.

With the Bloc only being about what’s in the best interests of Quebec, & the Green Party being about environmental hypocrisy and apparently antisemitism….That leaves three ‘viable’ parties outside of Quebec….& two of them are left of centre or way left of centre so to meet and agree on issues they have to be away from the centre itself…& currently I’m not sure which one is the closest to the centre…

Splitting the vote between the “3” ‘viable’ parties with two of them aligned to the left of centre….even though the two are really actually one….but trying to out ‘left of centre’ each other….ugh….

If the NDP folds or collapses upon itself like the Green Party, that would only leave (outside of Quebec) two ‘viable’ parties for Canadians to choose from. The LPC would have to stand on its own merits and platform without co-opting the votes from the other left of centre party. In its current form, at this point in time, I don’t think it’s capable of that.
If the NDP collapses their voters would vote for the Lieberals because they have been brainwashed that the Conservatives are evil. They will stupidly believe that the Lieberals have the same values and not the values of convenience which is really what the Lieberals have. They will say or do whatever it takes to get elected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,134
9,053
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
If the NDP collapses their voters would vote for the Lieberals because they have been brainwashed that the Conservatives are evil. They will stupidly believe that the Lieberals have the same values and not the values of convenience which is really what the Lieberals have. They will say or do whatever it takes to get elected.
If the NDP collapses, their voters would have to pick one of the two other viable parties (if they live outside of Quebec, and aren’t antisemitics I guess). If the Liberals continue like they have…they can’t just vote for “the other” left of centre party if there’s only one….& would have to actually think about who they’re voting for….
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,879
2,576
113
Toronto, ON
If the NDP collapses, their voters would have to pick one of the two other viable parties (if they live outside of Quebec, and aren’t antisemitics I guess). If the Liberals continue like they have…they can’t just vote for “the other” left of centre party if there’s only one….& would have to actually think about who they’re voting for….
You give far too much credit to the average voter particularly one who leans left.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
5,903
3,720
113
Edmonton
I believe that we're in the situation we are because people vote with their feelings as opposed to what each party's policies are & how said policies would affect everyone. That has got to change with more education on what responsibilities each & every voter has to ensure our democracy continues. Without that, tyranny will fill the void.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,266
7,295
113
B.C.
I believe that we're in the situation we are because people vote with their feelings as opposed to what each party's policies are & how said policies would affect everyone. That has got to change with more education on what responsibilities each & every voter has to ensure our democracy continues. Without that, tyranny will fill the void.
As the average Canadian what any particular parties policies are and you will be met with a blank stare .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,134
9,053
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc says while the federal government is "not there yet" when it comes to launching some form of public inquiry into foreign interference, "constructive and collaborative" conversations are continuing — with more scheduled in the days ahead.

Asked what holdups remain, LeBlanc wouldn't say, telling reporters that "public conjecture" would not be helpful to the "constructive private conversations" underway.

Last week, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre accused the Liberals of "lying" for accusing the Official Opposition of impeding progress, pointing to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's powers to call a public inquiry under the Inquiries Act, at any time.

"We're waiting. We asked, we've offered the prime minister all the information he's asked for," Poilievre told reporters last week. "We've suggested a mandate, a timeframe, we have names ready to share with him as soon as he confirms that that he's going to go ahead with it."

"We're sitting next to our phone waiting for him to call with any news on when that inquiry will happen," Poilievre said.

Opposition MPs have been calling for a public inquiry into foreign interference for several months amid heightened attention on alleged attempts by China to meddle in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.

There appeared to be momentum leading towards an imminent announcement of a potential inquiry, or other “unspecified new process,” when the House of Commons adjourned for the summer on June 22.

However, in the weeks since then there has been little update on whether it will be a full public inquiry after all, who could lead this initiative, or what kind of timeline would be set for this investigation of the issue.

Trudeau has said that the federal government wouldn't be making any announcement on a new approach to examine foreign interference in Canada until the Liberals secured "full buy-in" (???) from the opposition parties, to avoid the process becoming as hotly politicized as it did under Johnston.

Link…above…etc…
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Dixie Cup

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
111,924
12,358
113
Low Earth Orbit
Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc says while the federal government is "not there yet" when it comes to launching some form of public inquiry into foreign interference, "constructive and collaborative" conversations are continuing — with more scheduled in the days ahead.

Asked what holdups remain, LeBlanc wouldn't say, telling reporters that "public conjecture" would not be helpful to the "constructive private conversations" underway.

Last week, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre accused the Liberals of "lying" for accusing the Official Opposition of impeding progress, pointing to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's powers to call a public inquiry under the Inquiries Act, at any time.

"We're waiting. We asked, we've offered the prime minister all the information he's asked for," Poilievre told reporters last week. "We've suggested a mandate, a timeframe, we have names ready to share with him as soon as he confirms that that he's going to go ahead with it."

"We're sitting next to our phone waiting for him to call with any news on when that inquiry will happen," Poilievre said.

Opposition MPs have been calling for a public inquiry into foreign interference for several months amid heightened attention on alleged attempts by China to meddle in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.

There appeared to be momentum leading towards an imminent announcement of a potential inquiry, or other “unspecified new process,” when the House of Commons adjourned for the summer on June 22.

However, in the weeks since then there has been little update on whether it will be a full public inquiry after all, who could lead this initiative, or what kind of timeline would be set for this investigation of the issue.

Trudeau has said that the federal government wouldn't be making any announcement on a new approach to examine foreign interference in Canada until the Liberals secured "full buy-in" (???) from the opposition parties, to avoid the process becoming as hotly politicized as it did under Johnston.

Link…above…etc…
Meanwhile in the political theatre......

FOREST FIRE!!!
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,134
9,053
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Nothing to do with politics but through some lackey under the bus, maybe people will forget about the big lackey.
A retired RCMP officer has been charged with foreign interference, the Mounties said in a news release Friday.

William Majcher, 60, "allegedly used his knowledge and his extensive network of contacts in Canada to obtain intelligence or services to benefit the People's Republic of China," the RCMP in Montreal said in the news release.

The release alleged that Majcher "contributed to the Chinese government's efforts to identify and intimidate an individual outside the scope of Canadian law."

The alleged foreign interference did not involve elections or politics, an RCMP spokesperson said.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,134
9,053
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Well, this whole topic has been on the back burner Politically it seems for quite some time. A quick search this morning and the most recent new story I can find on this…”Chinese Interference Canadian Elections” is from the Wall Street Journal from almost a month ago & it’s paywalled. Is that because it’s a non-issue (?) or because I used Google as a search engine for a Canadian news story???
1690982632701.jpeg
There’s nothing recent from a Canadian news source on this Canadian issue from Canada. The top 4 hits are from news sources outside Canada. Is that a Bill C-18 thing (?) and perhaps even a goal of the current government?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,266
7,295
113
B.C.
Canadian media have been instructed to bury the story . And like good little lemmings they do .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,134
9,053
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
New Democrat Leader Jagmeet Singh says his party faces resistance to including countries other than China in the terms of reference for a public inquiry on foreign interference.

House leaders from the main federal parties have been meeting over the summer in an attempt to set the terms and timeline for an inquiry and to appoint a potential leader.

The talks follow media reports earlier this year that alleged China “tried” to interfere in the last two federal elections, although parties agree it did not affect the outcome of the elections….& that’s it. No other details.