The old saying is that you can lead a horse to water but can’t make it drink. The Trudeau government, in attacking CSIS over the Michael Chong story, clearly wants the spy agency to lead the government to water and make it drink.
At the Liberal Convention over the weekend, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino blamed CSIS for not briefing the PM and his then public safety minister directly, in person, on the intimidation of Chong and his family.
“It’s a serious problem that in July 2021 that neither the prime minister or the public safety minister at the time were briefed directly by CSIS,” Mendicino said Friday.
Apparently, sending a report on the issue to the PM’s department, the minister and their top staff and expecting them to read the report is not enough? The Trudeau government needs to have the reports read to them like a bedtime story?
Last Wednesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau went so far as to say that the CSIS report in July 2021 never left the intelligence agency, it wasn’t shared. That unlikely claim was debunked the next day when Trudeau’s national security advisor, Jody Thomas, informed Chong that the report had been sent to the Privy Council Office.
Trudeau had three different people in the role of national security advisor in 2021 – Vicent Rigby, Mike MacDonald and David Morrison. Rigby and MacDonald have both told Global News they didn’t see the report, Morrison has not responded at this point?
Morrison is currently the deputy minister at Global Affairs and was the person charged with calling China’s ambassador to task over this interference last week.
Even with the rapid turnover for the national security advisor, the report was also sent to the relevant departments, which means then Public Safety Minister Bill Blair and his chief of staff, Zita Astravas, would both have received their own individual copies of the report.
It’s highly disturbing that neither Blair nor his chief, Astravas, noticed this report. That’s what we have to hope because to believe that they did notice and decided not to act would raise questions about whether partisan politics were at play.
The report was sent to the government as they were gearing up for the 2021 election, making this issue public at that time could have created sympathy for the Conservatives. It’s easy to imagine Canadians being outraged at China targeting a Canadian MP for voting to condemn China’s genocide of the Uighurs, a clear stand for human rights.
Despite evidence of diplomatic misconduct, more than five years have passed since Canada last ejected a foreign diplomat from the country.
apple.news
Did the Liberals opt not to deal with this report for partisan reasons? Were they so focused on beating the Conservatives that they ignored attacks by a foreign government on our democracy?
These questions should be unthinkable. We should expect that all politicians would put country over party.
It’s not clear, given what we’ve learned over the last week, that we can assume that anymore. Asking whether the lack of action was partisan in nature is entirely acceptable given the circumstances.
Rather than attack CSIS, the Trudeau Liberals should examine their own actions.
apple.news