Ummm...Someone needs to poke the bear to get him mad a little once in a while
I'm not hibernating, I have a life.
Last edited:
Ralph Nader: Stephen Harper is selling the politics of fear
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
You living a lie.
Well then come back full time and stop living a lie
(* ˘⌣˘)◞[_][_]ヽ(•‿• )
It's funny when a reply focusing on a spelling mistake, contains a spelling mistake.You living a lie.
Well then come back full time and stop living a lie
(* ˘⌣˘)◞[_][_]ヽ(•‿• )
Ha, weird how life works it's way out sometimes. It's almost like it's doing it purposely.
Conservatives have advantaged on manipulating Canadians by having their old stand by methods to do so,one of them is "fear mongering",it is a replay action,paired with effective strategy which has a history of success,fear mongering comes in different packages,for example at one time,enabling fear of East West Canadian relations was a big strategy which was very effective.Albertans are still fearful of Quebec and those "Easterners".Learing this effective strategy is part of "Conservative school 101",if you can learn to fear monger and play the accompanying lingo you will move to an office with a view,become the techers pet,receive a welcome and membership into the whiskey and water club,and move to the front of the classroom,or to a cage,it depends where the student can be used in the scheme of polticial interest.The Ace card of fear is trump,'Manfactured fear",not real concerns,"imaginative fears",Conservative's are not big on real fears,this means communities, or people setting the standards,this is not allowed. I imagine"manufactured fear" will be a big soapbox agenda in certain ridings in certain regions in the next election.
Not true. The globull warming believers have manufactured data in a somewhat lame attempt to prove their point. The far left have also manufactured lots of what they would like to think are conservative disasters.
Myself, I like to postion myself in the middle,even thou I am unable to fully explain what that really means,I am working on this,I think there has been a long time of neglect,oversight,allowance, within politics,corrections are needed.
when I speak of manufacturing information,I really mean,the information is to generate a response, the Conservatives have mastered this in rural Alberta.
This is not true, politics is all about manufacturing,and more so I like you to know I specialize in information design,my main interest is manfacturing information and generating a response,I am really good at this identification.I figure i could talk circles around you in this subject,I could provide many examples of information design to generate response,repeat cases if you need the "proof".
What is your claim to fame in the information design process?or anything else for that matter ?
The nice thing about information design and manfacturing is if it is successful it repeats itself,expectations is mixed with success and agendas.where one lives will effect the manufactoring of information process,this makes it effortless for me to do my assessment.Manfacturing information and response with this information has an easy road to identification for myself.
I call these predictable process's,"the 80's manufacturing system",believe it or not the rural population is still believing all this manfactured information.
For sure financial application effects the manufacturing process
I keep a sign in my office, it is simply stated with "Theatre',politics is all about manufacturing,including peoples thinking process's.
I have never been part of the whiskey and water group, or have attended a political school of thinking,I am not into politics,so don't be so defensive.
I can't remember if i was high when I had written that blog,I will let you know if I remember,lo!
ralph nader has always been a voice of logic.
The conservatives, like any other political party, is a commodity to be sold to the masses. Parties do indeed manufacture problems that "need" to be solved, and voila, they have the solution. The other parties boast that their solution is better, or where that won't work, create their own problem/solutions.
But to divert you from looking at the total product, they promote incentives. That is a dead give away. Imagine, you've steered the economy in such a way that prosperity is shared by most, taxes are reasonable, you run a tight ship, your laws are in the interests of most of the country, they make sense, their not based upon personal bias, you've lead, and yet, for some reason, you have to launch programs (we can't afford) to buy votes. Hummm.
Canada has more to fear from drunk drivers and poorly sanitized sausage, yet we must, grant police forces more power and the citizen less personal power, to protect us from .... Vote them out. And if others support their policy, don't vote them in. You get only one kick at the cat, lets make sure we hear it screech.
At Vote Canada we feel that Harper needs to do a whole lot more explaining regarding this bill. The plus sides are unclear and the potential negatives are vast. We hope you will visit Vote Canada takes on Bill C-51 and weigh in. Our goal is to provide an opportunity for Canadians to share thoughts and views in context with their background and views.
We think that Vote Canada is much more then a Blog. What we are doing is collecting data (you come to us polling) about how people feel about issues and how they would vote etc. We then report it back in chart form in the context of background/location etc.. An example might be: 80% of people from New Brunswick who are immigrants and support the Conservatives federally want Harper to better explain Bill c-51. With this data (it is hoped from statistically significant numbers of people) we will actively find more and more interesting ways to report it back to everyone. Politicians will listen... it is hoped.
He was bang on about that sh!tty car. Very unbalanced ride, spin out prone. Horrible beast.
Harpo did say we wouldn`t recognize Canada when he was done with it.
More closets