RAF Jet Chases Russian Planes Away From UK

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I'm just going to skip all the posts being tossed back and forth about how evil the UK is.... it's a bit side-lining.

Those bloody Russians are pushing it. If they want war, they can have it. The British just love fighting a nice war.

Really? This isn't anything new with the Russians. They pull this off in the North with Canada every so often.

Canadian jets repel Russian bombers
Canadian jets repel Russian bombers | Canada | News | Toronto Sun

..... NORAD fighter jets have intercepted between 12 and 18 Russian bombers per year since 2007. After the CF-18s made contact with the Russians the pilots shadowed them until the bombers turned northeast and headed out of Canadian airspace.....

They fly near Canada's air space to check in on their neighbor, Canada sends a CF-18 or two to meet them, the pilot says, "How's it going? Russia's back that way, eh" they all wave to each other and head back home.

But when they do it to the UK, suddenly it's time to drop the nukes..... shiesh.

If this attitude was present during these incidences in Canada, Canada would have launched their fart bombs years ago.

Yeah, that's right.... FART BOMBS..... cuz Canada isn't supposed to have nukes and that's all that's available.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Independence, my ****. Like Canada, another British colony, Grenada still has the British Head of State reigning over it.

And we had to kick the Cubans out for you. Geez. Good job there!


Why is it I'm so much better at facts than you are?

You're not.

The US invasion of Grenada was aided by neighbouring Caribbean nations:

On October 25, 1983, combined forces from the United States and from the Regional Security System (RSS) based in Barbados invaded Grenada in an operation codenamed Operation Urgent Fury. The U.S. stated this was done at the behest of Prime Minister Eugenia Charles of Dominica. While the Governor-General of Grenada, Sir Paul Scoon, later stated that he had also requested the invasion, it was highly criticised by the governments of Britain, Trinidad and Tobago, and Canada. The United Nations General Assembly condemned it as "a flagrant violation of international law" by a vote of 108 in favor to 9, with 27 abstentions. The United Nations Security Council considered a similar resolution, which failed to pass when vetoed by the United States.

Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wrong again tard!



Day 6... Caribbean Units arrive for Peace Keeping duties.

How are those facts working for you?



The people of Britain were staggered when America refused to help in the Falklands. Even more so because the Americans were seen to be siding with the pretty sordid dictatorship of General Galtieri. America sent the message loud and clear - stuff you Britain, we prefer the dictators on our doorstep.

Proven fact...we supported the Brits.


Britain proved herself still capable of amazing military logistics in delivering her forces so fast and so massively into the South Atlantic, a long way away.

The fact that she did this without the help of her fairweather 'friend', America, made the feat still more extraordinary. The British even turned the ocean liners Canberra and QE2 into fighting ships in a matter of days!

They got short range Vulcan bombers (veterans of the 1950s), which were capable of carrying nuclear bombs, out of mothballs, patched them up and somehow got them in the air all the way down to the Falklands to accurately obliterate the runway in Port Stanley, denying the Argentine Air Force a landing strip and seriously compromising its capability - vital because the AAF was the only really effective element of the Argentine Armed Forces. In fact, it was the longest-range bombing mission in history.

All this was done while the Americans sidled up to the despotic General and the French (I wouldn't put anything past them) sold the Argentines the Exocet missiles that did such deadly damage to the Royal Navy.

This war is remembered with pride in the UK. The British Armed Forces proved once again they're the best. They proved it in the fighting and they proved it in the way they overcame the sheer enormity of the task of delivering a huge military force across the largest expanse of open sea without any friendly harbour or airport along the way - thanks to the Yanks.

The Americans abandoned their greatest ally at a time when Britain truly needed them. Worse, they abandoned the Brits in favour of a pretty gruesome dictatorship .... and the British people, who are strong on loyalty and friendship, have harbourred the grievance ever since. America should bear that in mind.

Without the US... the Argies would still be in the Malvinas.




Britain would have kicked America's **** had she entered the American Civil War on the side of the Confederacy.

They didn't because they knew they would be beaten for a third time by the US. They supported the Confederacy, a slave holding government. But they fell short of sending troops because they would have been slaughtered.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,068
1,920
113
If that's the case, then I say Canada doesn't come to your rescue this time.


Come to our rescue? What with? Your 15 warships and your army, which is 1.6 times smaller than Britain's Army Reserve, and your airforce, which has about as many planes as Britain's Army Air Corps? You'd be wiped out.

And we had to kick the Cubans out for you. Geez. Good job there!

Britain was AGAINST the US and its allies' invasion of Grenada.

You're not.

I am. Much better.

Wrong again tard!

On October 25, 1983, combined forces from the United States and from the Regional Security System (RSS) based in Barbados invaded Grenada in an operation codenamed Operation Urgent Fury. The U.S. stated this was done at the behest of Prime Minister Eugenia Charles of Dominica. While the Governor-General of Grenada, Sir Paul Scoon, later stated that he had also requested the invasion, it was highly criticised by the governments of Britain, Trinidad and Tobago, and Canada. The United Nations General Assembly condemned it as "a flagrant violation of international law" by a vote of 108 in favor to 9, with 27 abstentions. The United Nations Security Council considered a similar resolution, which failed to pass when vetoed by the United States.

Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Proven fact...we supported the Brits.

How? By Reagan telling Maggie on the phone to surrender the islands to the Argies?







They didn't because they knew they would be beaten for a third time by the US. They supported the Confederacy, a slave holding government. But they fell short of sending troops because they would have been slaughtered.[/QUOTE]
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Britain was AGAINST the US and its allies' invasion of Grenada.

So the Cubans take over Grenada and the Brits do absolutely nothing.

Then the US invades Grenada and the Brits are against it do absolutely nothing.

Smart move by the Brits! An azz kicking was awaiting them!

I am. Much better.
At fiction.

On October 25, 1983, combined forces from the United States and from the Regional Security System (RSS) based in Barbados invaded Grenada in an operation codenamed Operation Urgent Fury. The U.S. stated this was done at the behest of Prime Minister Eugenia Charles of Dominica. While the Governor-General of Grenada, Sir Paul Scoon, later stated that he had also requested the invasion, it was highly criticised by the governments of Britain, Trinidad and Tobago, and Canada. The United Nations General Assembly condemned it as "a flagrant violation of international law" by a vote of 108 in favor to 9, with 27 abstentions. The United Nations Security Council considered a similar resolution, which failed to pass when vetoed by the United States.

Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Facts are facts!

We did it and the Caribbean nations arrived after it was over. Even then the Brits sat by as a rag tag bunch of Islanders patrolled their colony. lmao




How? By Reagan telling Maggie on the phone to surrender the islands to the Argies?
By providing sidewinders, logistics and intelligence.

From your own papers!

Not so neutral after all: Ronald Reagan made secret plans to loan U.S. warship to Britain if aircraft carrier was lost during Falklands War



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tain-aircraft-carrier-lost-Falklands-War.html

And...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Events_leading_to_the_Falklands_War




Maggie swooooned over Reagan... known fact. She wanted a REAL MAN other than her hubby. ;)
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,068
1,920
113
So the Cubans take over Grenada and the Brits do absolutely nothing

The Cubans DIDN'T take over Grenada.

In 1979, a handful of leftists calling themselves the New Jewel Movement seized power in Grenada. Their charismatic leader, the British-educated Maurice Bishop, turned out to be an admirer of Fidel Castro. Some of his comrades, however, considered him insufficiently radical. In October 1983, they deposed and executed him. That gave Reagan his chance.

Britain considered itself the ultimate legal authority in Grenada because the island is part of the Commonwealth and Thatcher warned Reagan that an invasion "will be seen as intervention by a Western country in the internal affairs of a small independent nation, however unattractive its regime."

Then the US invades Grenada and the Brits are against it do absolutely nothing.

Smart move by the Brits! An azz kicking was awaiting them!

The invasion was illegal and was only perpetrated by the U.S. to give itself some self-respect after its butt-kicking in Vietnam and its humiliating hostage crisis in Iran.

The real reason for the operation was Reagan's belief that the U.S. needed a victory — any victory, anywhere.

A senior British officer who watched the Grenada invasion from nearby Barbados, Maj. Mark Adkin, wrote afterward that it was launched because of "the intense desire of the president and his advisers to raise U.S. prestige, particularly at home and in the armed forces, where morale and self-respect had fallen substantially since Vietnam."

Of course, like most US military campaigns, the invasion was bungled.

For example, the U.S. State Department falsely claimed that a mass grave had been discovered that held 100 bodies of islanders who had been killed by Communist forces.

The Americans had to use photocopies of tourist maps of Grenada, since the U.S. military had, believe it or not, no maps of its own for the country. The maps also did not show topography and were not marked with crucial positions.

U.S. Navy ships providing naval gunfire and U.S. Marine, U.S. Air Force and navy fighter/bomber support aircraft providing close air support mistakenly fired upon and killed U.S. ground forces due to differences in maps and location coordinates, data, and methods of calling for fire support. Communication was so confused that one American officer had to call his base in North Carolina from a pay phone to request air cover.

After an American bomb was mistakenly dropped on a mental hospital, dazed patients wandered aimlessly as heavily armed fighters emerged from surrounding cinnamon and allspice plantations, lending a surreal quality to the operation.

Facts are facts!

We did it and the Caribbean nations arrived after it was over.

Dear oh dear. You really do keep putting your foot in it...

The U.S. Army's Rapid Deployment Force (1st, 2nd Ranger Battalions and 82nd Airborne Division Paratroopers), U.S. Marines, U.S. Army Delta Force and U.S. Navy SEALs and other combined forces comprised the 7,600 troops from the United States, Jamaica, and members of the Regional Security System (RSS) defeated Grenadian resistance after a low-altitude airborne assault by the 75th Rangers on Point Salines Airport on the southern end of the island while a Marine helicopter and amphibious landing occurred on the northern end at Pearl's Airfield shortly afterward.

Invasion of Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


By providing sidewinders, logistics and intelligence.

Maggie swooooned over Reagan... known fact. She wanted a REAL MAN other than her hubby. ;)

She wasn't "crooning" over Reagan the time she turned Reagan to a nervous wreck when she berated him over the phone after he demanded Britain stop the fight against Argentina.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The Cubans DIDN'T take over Grenada.

In 1979, a handful of leftists calling themselves the New Jewel Movement seized power in Grenada. Their charismatic leader, the British-educated Maurice Bishop, turned out to be an admirer of Fidel Castro. Some of his comrades, however, considered him insufficiently radical. In October 1983, they deposed and executed him. That gave Reagan his chance.

Did the Brits make a habit of letting Cuban troops ditty bop around their colonies unchallenged?

Britain considered itself the ultimate legal authority in Grenada because the island is part of the Commonwealth and Thatcher warned Reagan that an invasion "will be seen as intervention by a Western country in the internal affairs of a small independent nation, however unattractive its regime."



The invasion was illegal and was only perpetrated by the U.S. to give itself some self-respect after its butt-kicking in Vietnam and its humiliating hostage crisis in Iran.

The Brits by then were well used to getting their respective butts kicked!

Invaded your colony and you didn't do a darn thing.

The real reason for the operation was Reagan's belief that the U.S. needed a victory — any victory, anywhere.

A senior British officer who watched the Grenada invasion from nearby Barbados, Maj. Mark Adkin, wrote afterward that it was launched because of "the intense desire of the president and his advisers to raise U.S. prestige, particularly at home and in the armed forces, where morale and self-respect had fallen substantially since Vietnam."

Of course, like most US military campaigns, the invasion was bungled.

Five days... who long did it take the Brits to take the Malvinas?

FAIL

Dear oh dear. You really do keep putting your foot in it...

The U.S. Army's Rapid Deployment Force (1st, 2nd Ranger Battalions and 82nd Airborne Division Paratroopers), U.S. Marines, U.S. Army Delta Force and U.S. Navy SEALs and other combined forces comprised the 7,600 troops from the United States, Jamaica, and members of the Regional Security System (RSS) defeated Grenadian resistance after a low-altitude airborne assault by the 75th Rangers on Point Salines Airport on the southern end of the island while a Marine helicopter and amphibious landing occurred on the northern end at Pearl's Airfield shortly afterward.

Invasion of Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They were Peace Keepers which arrived after the fighting.

Much like the Brit troops in Iraq. Clean up duty in the south.

Ohhhhh SNAP!




She wasn't "crooning" over Reagan the time she turned Reagan to a nervous wreck when she berated him over the phone after he demanded Britain stop the fight against Argentina.

She crooned and swooned over Reagan. Loved that man more than her wimpy husband.

And after the bungled war in the Malvina's...

"Both Weinberger and Reagan were later awarded the British honour of Knight Commander of the British Empire (KBE)."

Ohhhh SNAP!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,068
1,920
113
Did the Brits make a habit of letting Cuban troops ditty bop around their colonies unchallenged?

Does America make a habit of invading countries for no reason other than to improve their prestige after being butt-spanked in a war?


Five days... who long did it take the Brits to take the Malvinas?

FAIL

The British took on thousands of Argentine troops as well as Argentine planes and warships.

The Americans took on a mere 1,500 Grenadans, 722 Cubans and 24 North Koreans.

The British also had to send their forces 8,000 miles to the South Atlantic.

Grenada, meanwile, is on Yankeeland's own doorstep.

Massive difference.



They were Peace Keepers which arrived after the fighting.

The U.S. Army's Rapid Deployment Force (1st, 2nd Ranger Battalions and 82nd Airborne Division Paratroopers), U.S. Marines, U.S. Army Delta Force and U.S. Navy SEALs and other combined forces comprised the 7,600 troops from the United States, Jamaica, and members of the Regional Security System (RSS) defeated Grenadian resistance after a low-altitude airborne assault by the 75th Rangers on Point Salines Airport on the southern end of the island while a Marine helicopter and amphibious landing occurred on the northern end at Pearl's Airfield shortly afterward.

Invasion of Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Much like the Brit troops in Iraq.

Or the Yanks in Vietnam and Afghanistan.

She crooned and swooned over Reagan. Loved that man more than her wimpy husband.

She wasn't crooning over Reagan when she berated him over the phone because he wanted Britain to surrender. She gave him such a rollicking she left him a nervous, mumbling wreck.

The United States - Britain's so-called "ally" which was oh-so "helpful" during the Falklands War - even wanted to give Argentina advance warning that Britain was going to retake South Georgia in 1982 in a move that would have spelt disaster ahead of the Falklands campaign.

Ronald Reagan made repeated last-ditch attempts to persuade Margaret Thatcher to negotiate a truce so the Argentinians could save face and avoid "complete humiliation".

He feared that support for a European colonial power would undermine ties with Latin America and hamper Washington’s covert campaign against communism in the western hemisphere.

Thatcher refused, telling Mr Reagan in a late night phone call on May 31st, 1982 that she would "not contemplate" a ceasefire after the loss of "precious British lives".

She also rejected demands to hand the Falklands over to a joint US-Brazilian peacekeeping force, saying that she had not sent British forces across the globe just to "hand over the Queen's islands to a contact group".

Separately, Mrs Thatcher found herself subject to demands from the Pope John Paul II (the Catholic Church has long been an enemy of Britain). In one telegram, he calls on God to help "secure an immediate ceasefire." Thatcher, however, stood her ground, replying that Argentine aggression "cannot be allowed to succeed".



And after the bungled war in the Malvina's...

A war we won - by ourselves.
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Does America make a habit of invading countries for no reason other than to improve their prestige after being butt-spanked in a war?

Well the Brits clearly lost control of Grenada. We won another island back for you. I can see how ashamed you would be.


The British took on thousands of Argentine troops as well as Argentine planes and warships.

The Americans took on a mere 1,500 Grenadans, 722 Cubans and 24 North Koreans.

Massive difference.
Right... the Cubans and N. Koreans were better trained than the Argie conscripts.

How many ships did the Argies manage to sink?


The U.S. Army's Rapid Deployment Force (1st, 2nd Ranger Battalions and 82nd Airborne Division Paratroopers), U.S. Marines, U.S. Army Delta Force and U.S. Navy SEALs and other combined forces comprised the 7,600 troops from the United States, Jamaica, and members of the Regional Security System (RSS) defeated Grenadian resistance after a low-altitude airborne assault by the 75th Rangers on Point Salines Airport on the southern end of the island while a Marine helicopter and amphibious landing occurred on the northern end at Pearl's Airfield shortly afterward.

Invasion of Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Peace Keeper... as noted in "Later Phase"


Or the Yanks in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
You're in Afghanistan too! And you got whipped their once before. Brits getting tooled is quite common though.




She wasn't crooning over Reagan when she berated over the phone because he wanted Britain to surrender.

The United States even wanted to give Argentina advance warning that Britain was going to retake South Georgia in 1982 in a move that would have spelt disaster ahead of the Falklands campaign.

Ronald Reagan, the then US President, made repeated last-ditch attempts to persuade Margaret Thatcher to negotiate a truce so the Argentinians could save face and avoid "complete humiliation".

He feared that support for a European colonial power would undermine ties with Latin America and hamper Washington’s covert campaign against communism in the western hemisphere.

Thatcher refused, telling Mr Reagan in a late night phone call on May 31st, 1982 that she would "not contemplate" a ceasefire after the loss of "precious British lives".

She also rejected demands to hand the Falklands over to a joint US-Brazilian peacekeeping force, saying that she had not sent British forces across the globe just to "hand over the Queen's islands to a contact group".

Separately, Mrs Thatcher found herself subject to demands from the Pope John Paul II. In one telegram, he calls on God to help "secure an immediate ceasefire. Thatcher, however, stood her ground, replying that Argentine aggression "cannot be allowed to succeed".
She crooned over Reagan.

And the Brits so appreciated Reagan and Weinberger they gave them medals for the US Support of the Brits in the skirmish. A skirmish they would have lost.

And the Brits honored the US...

Both Weinberger and Reagan were later awarded the British honour of Knight Commander of the British Empire (KBE).

You fail so!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,068
1,920
113
Well the Brits clearly lost control of Grenada.

Yeah? How?

Right... the Cubans and N. Koreans were better trained than the Argie conscripts.

Are you genuinely boasting that 7,300 Americans and their Caribbean allies managed to defeat 722 Cubans and 24 North Koreans?

How many ships did the Argies manage to sink?


Peace Keeper... as noted in "Later Phase"

The U.S. Army's Rapid Deployment Force (1st, 2nd Ranger Battalions and 82nd Airborne Division Paratroopers), U.S. Marines, U.S. Army Delta Force and U.S. Navy SEALs and other combined forces comprised the 7,600 troops from the United States, Jamaica, and members of the Regional Security System (RSS) defeated Grenadian resistance after a low-altitude airborne assault by the 75th Rangers on Point Salines Airport on the southern end of the island while a Marine helicopter and amphibious landing occurred on the northern end at Pearl's Airfield shortly afterward.

Invasion of Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You're in Afghanistan too!

And we've done a better job than you.

She crooned over Reagan.

She wasn't crooning over Reagan the night she berated him on the phone because he wanted Britain to surrender in the Falklands War. Apparently, she turned him into a nervous wreck.

And the Brits so appreciated Reagan and Weinberger they gave them medals for the US Support of the Brits in the skirmish. A skirmish they would have lost.

An honour Reagan didn't deserve and certainly wouldn't have got had Thatcher did what he told her to do during the Falklands War.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
You can deny all you like that America was an ally of France in the Napoleonic Wars and so was on the losing side, but it will NOT change history. You cannot change it by denying it. No amount of denying it will change that historical fact, so it doesn't bother me how much you deny it.

We weren't there fighting. In fact we fought a war with France during that time.



The Prussians were not even in the conflict from the start. The conflict started in 1803 and they didn't even enter it until 1806. In the anti-French coalition, led by Britain, Britain was virtually alone in remaining at war with France throughout the whole of the conflict (sounds just like WWII, but against Germany).


When the Prussians did enter the conflict the ill-equipped Prussian Army, which was small at just 42,000 men in strength and retained the same training, tactics and weaponry used by Frederick the Great some forty years earlier, was decisively defeated in the battles of Saalfeld, Jena and Auerstedt.

To say that the Prussians won the Napoleonic Wars shows just how bad history education is in North American schools.
The Prussians defeated France.

"Give me night... or give me Blucher." - Wellington at Waterloo.

Once again the Brits were saved by another nation.



Where's the evidence of this? Not one American aim of the conflict was even met. The Americans failed to achieve even one thing they set out to achieve. None of their aims were even discussed at the signing of the peace treaty. America lost the War of 1812.
All British invasions were tossed back into the sea or driven back to Canada.

WINNING!

A ragtag army defeating the so called invincible Brits.

And some of Brits best troops were totally humiliated at New Orleans.




Saying that America won the War of 1812 because it invaded Canada is like saying Germany won WWII because it invaded France.


Those pressing of sailors into the Royal Navy - which were BRITISH sailors which had deserted and joined American ships which the British were recapturing, NOT American sailors as the Yanks still claim today - ended only after Britain had defeated your ally France in the Napoleonic Wars in 1815. It was not the Americans and the War of 1812 which caused the impressments to end. It was Britain's victory in the Napoleonic Wars against your nefarious ally. Britain refused throughout the War of 1812 and after it to stop those impressments and the Yanks failed to stop them.

When the Yanks joined the war as late as 1917 the Allies were not that impressed with them. They were poorly equipped and had to borrow kit and weapons from the British and French - even tanks.

In fact, the British were so distrusting of the American Army which, unlike the British Army, was severely lacking in large-scale warfare, that they even tried to force the US to put its soldiers into British ranks.
The Brits begged for the Americans to join the war because they Germans had bled both you AND France white. They were in total control of the Western Front.

Then the Brits and French wanted to just stuff US Units in the lines as replacement troops. Pershing stopped that nonsense EXCEPT when the Germans had a break through in French lines and Pershing sent in the Marines. Who naturally drove the Germans back teaching everyone a lesson... including the French and British how to fight. Do you think the US was going to allow the Brits to bleed us white as they did themselves and every commonwealth nation? Oh hell no.

And why the heck SHOULD the US join that war any time than when they did. The Brits were nothing but a pain in the ***. They got themselves involved in yet another war they could not win on their own and we had nothing to do with it until it did involve us. Then we went over there and won it!

In the end, the four battle-ready American divisions were deployed with French and British units to gain combat experience by defending relatively quiet sectors of their lines.

So rather than these tough, all-American heroes sent to Europe to win a war the inept British and French couldn't win, WWI was nothing more than a training expertise for the inexperienced, badly-equipped Americans under British and French leadership using British and French equipment given relatively safe sectors to fight.
Bealleau Wood was safe? Oh you are so uninformed.





We've established that the only war in which America has fought an enemy on its own and won in the last 100 years was the Bananas War. And that's probably the ONLY war in its history that it has won on its own.
You falsely established that ignoring facts.


Doesn't matter. The US lost the war.



And that defeat took only place AFTER the British had won the war.

The Battle of New Orleans took place on 8th January 1815. The Treaty of Ghent was signed -with not one American aim having even been discussed - on 24th December 1814.

New Orleans was too little, too late for the Yanks.
Too late? We won the war and that Battle of New Orleans was such a lopsided victory for us that the Brits were very thankful that it was over.

The excuse that the war was over before New Orleans is just that. And oh did the Brits get trounced.

Yeah? How?

Letting Cubans and N. Koreans in.



Are you genuinely boasting that 7,300 Americans and their Caribbean allies managed to defeat 722 Cubans and 24 North Koreans?
Completely whipped them because the Brits couldn't. Landed right on your colony. LMAO




The U.S. Army's Rapid Deployment Force (1st, 2nd Ranger Battalions and 82nd Airborne Division Paratroopers), U.S. Marines, U.S. Army Delta Force and U.S. Navy SEALs and other combined forces comprised the 7,600 troops from the United States, Jamaica, and members of the Regional Security System (RSS) defeated Grenadian resistance after a low-altitude airborne assault by the 75th Rangers on Point Salines Airport on the southern end of the island while a Marine helicopter and amphibious landing occurred on the northern end at Pearl's Airfield shortly afterward.

Invasion of Grenada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Kills you eh?



And we've done a better job than you.
If you count killing other NATO troops... you're doing so much better!

Other than that... you're fairly useless over there.



She wasn't crooning over Reagan the night she berated him on the phone because he wanted Britain to surrender in the Falklands War. Apparently, she turned him into a nervous wreck.



An honour Reagan didn't deserve and certainly wouldn't have got had Thatcher did what he told her to do during the Falklands War.
Ahhhhh haaa. That's right. Awarded a medal PROVES you're FOS.

And she so loved Reagan... so deeply.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,068
1,920
113
We weren't there fighting. In fact we fought a war with France during that time.

Rubbish. The British consider the War of 1812 to have been part of the Napoleonic Wars. You were allied with France in the Napoleonic Wars and, along with France, you lost.


The Prussians defeated France.

Go on, then. Explain how little Prussia - which was at times during that conflict France's ally - defeated France. You seem like an expert.

"Give me night... or give me Blucher."
- Wellington at Waterloo.

What is it with you Yanks in believing historical myths to be true?

And saying that the "Prussians won" Waterloo ignores the fact that Napoleon couldn't beat the British BEFORE the Prussians arrived.

In fact, the British, as the British are very good at doing, managed to remain firm and indomitable and managed to absorb everything that Old Boney was chucking at them before the Prussians arrived.

General Antoine-Henri, Baron Jomini one of the leading military writers on the Napoleonic art of war, had a number of very cogent explanations of the reasons behind Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo.
In my opinion, four principal causes led to this disaster:

The first, and most influential, was the arrival, skilfully combined, of Blücher, and the false movement that favoured this arrival;the second, was the admirable firmness of the British infantry, joined to the sang-froid and aplomb of its chiefs; the third, was the horrible weather, that had softened the ground, and rendered the offensive movements so toilsome, and retarded till one o'clock the attack that should have been made in the morning; the fourth, was the inconceivable formation of the first corps, in masses very much too deep for the first grand attack
All British invasions were tossed back into the sea or driven back to Canada.

WINNING!

The Americans failed to annex Canada and failed to stop the British re-impressing back into the Royal Navy those British sailors who had deserted to Yank ships.

America, it is fair to say, lost the War of 1812.

Remember, the British only invaded America because America was trying to annex British territories to the north. America, as the aggressor, had it coming.

And some of Brits best troops were totally humiliated at New Orleans.

As already pointed out, the Battle of New Orleans took place AFTER the British had already won the War of 1812. It was too little too late for the Yanks.

The Brits begged for the Americans to join the war because they Germans had bled both you AND France white. They were in total control of the Western Front.

Bull****. The Germans didn't have "total control" of the Western Front. The Western Front was a stalemate until the British introduced their new invention - the tank - to the proceedings.

Then the Brits and French wanted to just stuff US Units in the lines as replacement troops.

The British and French knew that the US troops were so badly-trained, inexperienced and lacking in resources that they tried to get US troops to fight in British and French ranks rather than fighting separately.

Pershing stopped that nonsense EXCEPT when the Germans had a break through in French lines and Pershing sent in the Marines. Who naturally drove the Germans back teaching everyone a lesson... including the French and British how to fight.

Impact of US forces on the war

On the battlefields of France in spring 1918, the fresh American troops were enthusiastically welcomed by the war-weary Allied armies in the summer of 1918. They arrived at the rate of 10,000 a day, at a time that the Germans were unable to replace their losses. After the Allies turned back the powerful final German offensive (Spring Offensive), the Americans played a role in the Allied final offensive (Hundred Days Offensive). Many American commanders used the same flawed tactics which the British and French abandoned early in the war, and so not all American offensives were particularly effective.

United States in World War I - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


And why the heck SHOULD the US join that war any time than when they did.

I'm not bothered whether the US entered the war or not. The US played little part in it anyway.

They got themselves involved in yet another war

That's because Germany invaded Belgium.

Then we went over there and won it!

A typical response from an inhabitant of a country whose children are brainwashed at school into believing that America won both World Wars singlehandedly.

Bealleau Wood was safe? Oh you are so uninformed
.

At the beginning, during early 1918, the four battle-ready U.S. divisions were deployed with French and British units to gain combat experience by defending relatively quiet sectors of their lines.

American Expeditionary Forces - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


We won the war

How? You failed to annex Canada. You failed to stop the British recapturing British sailors who had deserted to American ships.

If that was an American victory it would have been interesting to see an American defeat.

and that Battle of New Orleans was such a lopsided victory for us that the Brits were very thankful that it was over.

That Battle of New Orleans took place AFTER the Treaty of Ghent, the peace treaty which finally brought about British victory, had been signed. New Orleans was too little too late for the nefarious Yanks.

The excuse that the war was over before New Orleans is just that.

The Treaty of Ghent (8 Stat. 218 ), signed on December 24, 1814 in the Flemish city of Ghent, was the peace treaty that ended the War of 1812 between the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Battle of New Orleans - 8th January 1815

Letting Cubans and N. Koreans in.

We didn't let them in. The Grenadans did.


If you count killing other NATO troops... you're doing so much better
!


It's the Americans, not the British, who have the reputation for killing other NATO troops - not to mentions wedding parties.

Ahhhhh haaa. That's right. Awarded a medal PROVES you're FOS.

He wouldn't have been awarded had Thatcher listened to him and surrendered in the Falklands War.
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Rubbish. The British consider the War of 1812 to have been part of the Napoleonic Wars. You were allied with France in the Napoleonic Wars and, along with France, you lost.

Oh well if the Brits consider that then stop the presses!




Go on, then. Explain how little Prussia - which was at times during that conflict Frabce's ally - defeated France. You seem like an expert.

Blucher and the Prussians at Waterloo. Enough said. The Prussian entry saved the Brits. Heck even the Brit line was full of troops from other nations.


And saying that the "Prussians won" Waterloo ignores the fact that Napoleon couldn't beat the British BEFORE the Prussians arrived.

They were beating them.

In fact, the British, as the British are very good at doing, managed to remain firm and absorb and indomitable and managed to absorb everything that Old Boney was chucking at them before the Prussians arrived.

Again with other nations bolstering their lines. I often wonder why the Brits were even there that day. They contributed little.


America, it is fair to say, lost the War of 1812.

Albeit wrong

Remember, the British only invaded America because America was trying to annex British territories to the north. America, as the aggressor, had it coming.

And the Limeys got their butts handed to them



As already pointed out, the Battle of New Orleans took place AFTER the British had already won the War of 1812. It was too little too late for the Yanks.

It happened after the Limeys lost... adding more insult.



Bull****. The Germans didn't have "total control" of the Western Front. The Western Front was a stalemate until the British introduced their new invention - the tank - to the proceedings.

Total and complete. They even had concrete trenches as opposes to the Brits living in their own excrement.



The British and French knew that the US troops were so badly-trained, inexperienced and lacking in resources that they tried to get US troops to fight in British and French ranks rather than fighting separately.

So they thought. Then the Yanks won it all!


Impact of US forces on the war

On the battlefields of France in spring 1918, the fresh American troops were enthusiastically welcomed by the war-weary Allied armies in the summer of 1918.

Yes they did. Too bad their off-spring became idiots!

I'm not bothered whether the US entered the war or not. The US played little part in it anyway.

We won it.


How? You failed to annex Canada. You failed to stop the British recapturing British sailors who had deserted to American ships.

They did stop. We won. Britain wanted to Annex US Territory. It failed to do so. We won.


That Battle of New Orleans took place AFTER the Treaty of Ghent, the peace treaty which finally brought about British victory, had been signed. New Orleans was too little too late for the nefarious Yanks.

Oh what a defeat it was for the Limeys that day!


We didn't let them in. The Grenadans did.

Brits Colony! Figures. Well we invaded it. lol

Admit it.


It's the Americans, not the British, who have the reputation for killing other NATO troops - not to mentions wedding parties.

The Brits have the worst record in Blue on Blue in Afghanistan. Far worse than any other. Brit forces attacked Danish forces for hours before they finally stopped!



He wouldn't have been awarded had Thatcher listened to him and surrendered in the Falklands War.

The Brits and especially Thatcher loved Reagan and they gave him a medal for supporting them in the Malvina's
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,068
1,920
113
Oh well if the Brits consider that then stop the presses!

The War of 1812 to the British was a mere sideshow to the much larger conflict against Boney in Europe.


Blucher and the Prussians at Waterloo. Enough said. The Prussian entry saved the Brits.

Boney sent the cream of his army, some 6000 bayonets, all fresh troops, against the British forces who had been fighting, and holding out, against the Frogs all day. The Frogs were routed by Wellington's troops and mostly fled in disorder. This was before the Prussians arrived. The Prussians had no part in this decisive moment of the battle.

The British battalions also formed much stronger formations during the battle than either the French and the Prussians.

The largest battalion on the battlefield was British I/52nd Regiment of Foot, 1.130 men.

The smallest battalion was French III/108th Line Regiment, 251 men.

The battalions of British Foot Guard averaged approx. 1,000 men, the strength of French regiment.

The strongest squadrons on the battlefield were also Wellington's squadrons.

Average squadron at Waterloo:
- 145 men / Wellington's cavalry
- 135 men / Napoleon's cavalry
- 115 men / Blucher's cavalry


Heck even the Brit line was full of troops from other nations.

So was the French. In 1815 the French Army had EIGHT foreign regiments.


They were beating them.

Not according to the Battle of Waterloo historians.

The experts say that the British spent hours indomitably holding out against Froggy before the Prussians arrived.

There is no evidence whatsoever that the British were "losing" Waterloo before the Prussians arrived.

Albeit wrong

You seem to think that denying something happened means that you've changed history and have prevented it from happening. But that's not the case. No amount of denying that America lost the War of 1812 without achieving any of its aims will change the fact that it lost the War of 1812. That'll never change.


And the Limeys got their butts handed to them

It's a pity for the Yanks that you only "handed our butts to us" at New Orleans only AFTER you lost the war. It was too little too late for you.

Total and complete. They even had concrete trenches as opposes to the Brits living in their own excrement.

Not my fault if they couldn't hack it in real trenches like the British.

And those concrete bunkers didn't win them the war. When the British introduced the tank to the conflict the Hun ran off terrified.


So they thought. Then the Yanks won it all!

Yeah. A lot of Americans think that.

They did stop.

We stopped after we defeated the French in the Napoleonic Wars. We didn't stop as a result of American action in the War of 1812. It was our VICTORY in the Napoleonic Wars against Old Boney that finally allowed us to stop re-impressing captured British deserters.

Britain wanted to Annex US Territory.

Have you got any any evidence for this or are you just going off the romantic propaganda you are taught at school?


Well we invaded it.
Admit it.

You invaded for no reason other than to bag a bit of glory and prestige after losing in Vietnam.

Brit forces attacked Danish forces for hours before they finally stopped!

In the Tarnak Farm incident of 18 April 2002, four Canadian soldiers were killed and eight others injured when U.S. Air National Guard Major Harry Schmidt, dropped a laser-guided 500 lb (230 kg) bomb from his F-16 jet fighter on the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry regiment which was conducting a night firing exercise near Kandahar. Schmidt was charged with negligent manslaughter, aggravated assault, and dereliction of duty. He was found guilty of the latter charge. During testimony Schmidt blamed the incident on his use of "go pills" (authorized mild stimulants), combined with the 'fog of war'. The Canadian dead received US medals for "bravery", but no apology.

Pat Tillman, a former professional American football player, was shot and killed by American fire in 22 April 2004. An Army Special Operations Command investigation was conducted by Brigadier General Jones and the U.S. Department of Defense concluded that Pat Tillman's death was due to friendly fire aggravated by the intensity of the firefight. A more thorough investigation concluded that no hostile forces were involved in the firefight and that two allied groups fired on each other in confusion after a nearby explosive device was detonated.

Operation Medusa (2006): 1 – Two U.S. A-10 Thunderbolts accidentally strafed NATO forces in southern Afghanistan, killing Canadian Private Mark Anthony Graham.

On 5 December 2006, an American F/A-18C on a Close Air Support mission in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, mistakenly attacked a trench where British Royal Marines were dug-in during a 10-hour battle with Taliban fighters, killing one Royal Marine.

Of two helicopters called in to support operations by the British Grenadier Guards and Afghan National Army forces in Helmand, the British Westland WAH-64 Apache engaged enemy forces, while the accompanying American AH-64D Apache opened fire on the Grenadiers and Afghan troops.

The Brits and especially Thatcher loved Reagan and they gave him a medal for supporting them in the Malvina's

Spitting Image, a widely-watched satirical British television show of the 1980s, famously suggested that Ronald Reagan fancied Margaret Thatcher something rotten.

‘What a fine lookin’ woman,’ the punch line to one particularly celebrated latex puppet sketch ran. ‘Pity I’m only screwing her country.’

The sketch showed just how unpopular Reagan was in Britain.

 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The sketch showed just how unpopular Reagan was in Britain.


And that is supposed to put Maggie in a good light? lmao. Well I guess it does look exactly like Maggie. Poor Maggie... all of Britain danced in the streets the day she died.

Beat it... Yanks Rule and Britain sucks!

 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,068
1,920
113
all of Britain danced in the streets the day she died.

The only people who danced in the street the day she died were socialists, Communists, trades union members and members of the Labour Party.

And those students, the lefty-type ones, who weren't even born when she was PM.