He is a self righteous, arrogant dipshit. He has nothing to say that is of any value to a worm.Sleepy may be a good guy for you to start listening to! It certainly wouldn't hurt you!
He is a self righteous, arrogant dipshit. He has nothing to say that is of any value to a worm.Sleepy may be a good guy for you to start listening to! It certainly wouldn't hurt you!
That would mean that you are a worm a fake book addicted worm!He is a self righteous, arrogant dipshit. He has nothing to say that is of any value to a worm.
He is a self righteous, arrogant dipshit. He has nothing to say that is of any value to a worm.
There’s no completely objective way to measure legal ability, but a common metric used by legal employers to identify the most gifted lawyers is whether those lawyers secured a federal clerkship, including the most prestigious clerkships at the Supreme Court. Approximately 40 percent of Trump’s appellate nominees clerked for a Supreme Court justice, and about 80 percent clerked on a federal court of appeals. That compares to less than a quarter of Obama’s nominees who clerked on the Supreme Court, and less than half with a federal appellate clerkship
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...tion-unqualified-mitch-mcconnell-donald-trump
Vox is the Prog site to end all Prog sites.
Yet you folks cheer for a guy whose main source of info is Fox&Friends and Twitter. hahaha Effing hilarious.
Very reliable news source.More than 200 Congress members sign amicus brief asking to overturn 1973 Roe v. Wade
A petition gaining support in Congress is calling for Roe v. Wade to be reconsidered. Over 200 lawmakers, including two Democrats, have reportedly signed an amicus brief led by Rep. Steve Scalise in a Louisiana abortion case set to be heard by the Supreme Court this spring.
In their petition lawmakers are advising the court to take up Roe v. Wade again and, if appropriate, should overrule the entire case. The document claims the right to abortion is “unworkable” and that the ruling has set a precedent, which has proven “radically unsettled.” The Supreme Court made Roe v. Wade law in a landmark 1973 ruling, deeming restrictive state regulation of abortion unconstitutional.
More: https://www.oann.com/more-than-200-...cus-brief-asking-to-overturn-1973-roe-v-wade/
Yet you folks cheer for a guy whose main source of info is Fox&Friends and Twitter. hahaha Effing hilarious.
Yet you folks cheer for a guy whose main source of info is Fox&Friends and Twitter. hahaha Effing hilarious.
Trump groupies. I didn't say you or anyone else but Trump pays attention to Fox and Twitter. But Trump obviously does.Which folks? I don't patronize either of them!
Typical. They don't get it that it costs a lot more when hospitals and the like have to tend to backyard abortions and the like. If they had any wits at all they would ratify a bill to fork over for contraception, it'd be a lot cheaper than abortions and related health bills.More than 200 Congress members sign amicus brief asking to overturn 1973 Roe v. Wade
A petition gaining support in Congress is calling for Roe v. Wade to be reconsidered. Over 200 lawmakers, including two Democrats, have reportedly signed an amicus brief led by Rep. Steve Scalise in a Louisiana abortion case set to be heard by the Supreme Court this spring.
In their petition lawmakers are advising the court to take up Roe v. Wade again and, if appropriate, should overrule the entire case. The document claims the right to abortion is “unworkable” and that the ruling has set a precedent, which has proven “radically unsettled.” The Supreme Court made Roe v. Wade law in a landmark 1973 ruling, deeming restrictive state regulation of abortion unconstitutional.
More: https://www.oann.com/more-than-200-...cus-brief-asking-to-overturn-1973-roe-v-wade/
Big deal. Most people thought Earth was the center of the universe, too. They were wrong about that, too. And I said Fox&Friends, not Fox News. Having trouble with English?Most watched news service in North America
Fox News is probably as reliable as any other lamestream newsmedia. But I wasn't referring to Fox News anyway.I've never watched Fox News? Are they not reliable? If they are not reliable how do all Trump's dissenters know so much about him? Someone is bullshitting somebody!
Oh dear. Is Moosie confused again?Fox News is probably as reliable as any other lamestream newsmedia. But I wasn't referring to Fox News anyway.
Yeah, but it's nothing new.Oh dear. Is Moosie confused again?