Queen Elizabeth isn't Britain's legitimate monarch

Murphy

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
The real king lives in Australia. Wait until you hear what he has to say about the Queen and the UK. I can't really blame him. It's hosted by Sir Tony Robinson, who isn't a real Kuh-Niggett, cuz Liz ain't the real queen.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG4Ec9nEwwk
 
PoliticalNick

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
You are only just figuring out a woman of Germanic and Greek heritage is not the legitimate monarch of England under the laws of succession.....time to catch up. One of the reasons Charles and Diana were forced to marry was to try and bring legitimacy back to the House of Windsor through Diana's heritage which has been in the British nobility since before the Dark Ages. The Windsors were once Saxe-Coburg & Gotha and The Queen's grandfather was of the house of Wettin directly from Germany.
 
damngrumpy

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
The real line should be from the Stuarts and Mary Queen Of Scots but the
folks from the Tudor line killed her
 
Murphy

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Some of you obviously didn't watch the show. Where the train came off the tracks was back when the Plantagenets were still kicking around in the late 1400s. Robinson notes that ascending to the throne is tenuous at best and that there really has never been a divine right of kings.

But I suppose it doesn't matter. King Abdulla Mohammad Abdulla will soon rule there anyway. :lol:



What's old will be new again. The only question is, will they start using the Tower of London once more to behead naughty Britishers, or just lop them off in the streets?
 
C

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
You'll be getting real oil money for your daughters, now not that scrip underwritten by pottery.
 
Murphy

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
The legitimate heir is tracked down at the end. He is a fellow who left England in 1960 and moved to Oz. He was aware of having royal blood, but not that he should actually be sitting on the throne. Robinson showed him the research. They used the London firm who ensures the royals are properly titled, explain the rules of succession to government, etc. It's in the video. It's all documented.

Yes, they show the real royal family toward the end of the show. They ask him if he would take back the throne, thoughts on how his family was robbed of their heritage, etc.
 
Bar Sinister

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Does anyone really give a damn as to who is the head of a completely outmoded institution that was created by murderers and thieves?
 
Murphy

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Perhaps if you watched the video, you would not have posted what you did. Does anyone really give a damn? No.

Robinson's presentation was entertaining and factual. It has a great twist at the end.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=IB0SxXTR_UI
 
Blackleaf

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
PoliticalNick said:
You are only just figuring out a woman of Germanic and Greek heritage is not the legitimate monarch of England under the laws of succession.....
Click to expand...

Yes she is. After her uncle King Edward VIII abdicated in 1936 and her father became King George VI she became the next in line to the Throne, according to the lawful line of succession.

damngrumpy said:
The real line should be from the Stuarts and Mary Queen Of Scots
Click to expand...

Elizabeth I was the rightful Queen of England as stipulated in her father Henry VIII's will, which said that his son Edward should be king after him and that if he died with no heirs then his elder daughter Mary should then be queen and that if she died with no heirs then his younger daughter Elizabeth should be queen. And that is what came to pass. Therefore, Mary, Queen of Scots' claim to Elizabeth's throne was, therefore, wrong, as stipulated in the will of her great-uncle Henry VIII, which was passed into English law.

folks from the Tudor line killed her
Click to expand...
She was executed by her cousin, onced removed, Elizabeth I because Mary rather stupidly got herself involved in a Catholic plot to overthrow Elizabeth and put Mary on the English throne.

That's not the fault of the Tudors. That's the fault of Mary and the conspirators.
 
Last edited:
Murphy

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
What a moron. Better learn some history, you oafish Brit.

Now I know why a Brit is posting about inaccurate British history on Canadian Content. His own countrymen won't have him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom