Proof That a Price on Carbon Works
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
They fudged the data, as I have already proven.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
They fudged the data, as I have already proven.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
Your article didn't prove anything.
I already quoted directly from it to show that it was about gas consumption, not carbon emissions reductions.
I already quoted directly from it to show that it was about gas consumption, not carbon emissions reductions.
They fudged the data, as I have already proven.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
Another excellent example of your dishonesty. Since reducing consumption was about decreasing emissions. Again, I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
You're just being near sighted.
Obviously you want to discourage consumption.
But that's not a failure in the interim if you are getting net carbon reductions.
That's how it's supposed to work.
I don't know how else to educate you on this really simple concept lol
Obviously you want to discourage consumption.
But that's not a failure in the interim if you are getting net carbon reductions.
That's how it's supposed to work.
I don't know how else to educate you on this really simple concept lol
It failed, that much has been proven. I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
They fudged the data, as I have already proven.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
If they seriously fudged their numbers to show emissions reductions that didn't exist it would be much bigger news lol
The fact that you can't even post evidence from your own article that their emissions reductions target is invalid doesn't help your case.
The fact that you can't even post evidence from your own article that their emissions reductions target is invalid doesn't help your case.
They fudged the data, as I have already proven.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
There are no reductions. As you stated its consumers being dinged and cash forked over to Evil Corp LLC. Ecofascism.
Gee, I wonder why you won't actually post the evidence of the 'fudging'...
Hmmmmmm
You call carbon sequestration evil?
Why is it evil in BC but you champion it in your own province?
Hmmmmmm
You call carbon sequestration evil?
Why is it evil in BC but you champion it in your own province?
I already did. I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.
What is to fudge? Gas goes up, more people buy gas in WA. Mandatory MPG made everybody's emissions drop in the same period.
You just posted a link, but no quotation to fudging.
I read the article and there is nothing there to show they fudged their report.
Post a direct quote with your...rationale...so that you can at least appear convincing.
I read the article and there is nothing there to show they fudged their report.
Post a direct quote with your...rationale...so that you can at least appear convincing.
I can understand why you'd employ deceit to save face. What with your fragile ego and all.
Your opinion holds no weight, you're a proven liar.