It's all better now?
i think it is definitely better than the time Cuyahoga river caught on fire.
It's all better now?
I'll give you a dollar if you drink from a puddle.
At the time the Cuyahoga was on fire were there streams you could drink from but can't today?i think it is definitely better than the time Cuyahoga river caught on fire.
At the time the Cuyahoga was on fire were there streams you could drink from but can't today?
Now, I hate to rain on the parade here, disrupt this love fest going on as to how everything was paradise in 1959, how everything is Hell on earth today, but let us look at water quality.
In 1959, there were virtually no controls on who could dump what in water streams, most anybody was free to pollute to his heart’s content (I would say his or her, but in 1959 it was almost exclusively ‘his’).
In fact, this is what necessitated the Clean Water act of 1969.
1969 - Cuyahoga River catches fire in Ohio. Fires had erupted on the river many times, including June 22, 1969, when a river fire captured the attention of Time magazine, which described the Cuyahoga as the river that "oozes rather than flows" and in which a person "does not drown but decays." Helped spur legislative action on water pollution control resulting in the Clean Water Act, Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, and the creation of the federal Environmental Protection Agency.
1960s - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Great Lakes water quality was deteriorating fast, necessitating the formation of Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
In the subsequent years, considerable progress was made to improve the quality of water, to try to revive the eco systems. But in 1959, there was not even any awareness that humans were polluting wholesale, without regard to what happens to environment. Like most movements, the environmental movement, Ralph Nader were also safely in the future.
There was no problem with water quality, air quality in 1959 like there was no problem with spousal abuse, child sex abuse, racial discrimination etc. Like everything else, it was swept under the rug, nobody talked about it, so of course it didn’t exist.
There was no problem with water quality, air quality, food quality etc. because nobody complained about these things in those day, everything was peaceful and quiet. It was the peace of the graveyard.
In 1959 most people had too much common sense to be dumping crap in drinking water.
You don't know much about industries and pollution, do you?
In 1959 most people had too much common sense to be dumping crap in drinking water. Remember, this was before the era of "do your own thing" and "f**k you Jack, I'm alright".
No they didn’t JLM; there was very little environmental awareness in those days. People polluted as they saw fit, they used asbestos as if it was a harmless substance. There was no awareness about saving, preserving the wildlife, preserving our lakes, rivers, oceans etc. It took the environmental movement to raise a big stink, to make people aware of the environmental problems facing the nation (and indeed, the world).
In fact, that was exactly the attitude in those days, "f**k you Jack, I'm alright". Society was very rigid, very stratified, people did not care about minorities, single mothers, did not care for women working out side home etc.
There were very few laws to help the poor; there was no universal health care. So anybody who could afford to pay for it, would get health care, anybody who couldn’t afford, well, too bad. "f**k you Jack, I'm alright". Yes, that was exactly the attitude in those days.
That's definitely better than in 1959. Back then the oceans were just blue. Now they have a variety of colors.
Yep, there was a lot of hysteria over asbestos, until it was determined to be safe. If you just leave it alone and don't go drilling holes in it or ripping it with a saw, it's harmless and good for fire prevention.
Really? If asbestos is so safe, why aren't we using it widely today? Why the ban on the use of asbestos?
There are two types of asbestos, one is deadly, the other- chrysotile is fairly safe and is widely used today in such products as roofing material, pipe and cladding.
"In fact, that was exactly the attitude in those days, "f**k you Jack, I'm alright"."- Nope, that attitude didn't start until the late 60s. In 1959 people were quite polite and respectful of others, but I guess that's no good- anecdotal evidence!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yep, there was a lot of hysteria over asbestos, until it was determined to be safe. If you just leave it alone and don't go drilling holes in it or ripping it with a saw, it's harmless and good for fire prevention.
Polite and respectful, yes. But that didn’t mean they cared about others. They were OK with blacks being denied employment, education opportunities etc. They were OK with imprisoning gays for consensual sex. They were OK with denying women education, employment, housing opportunities, equal credit, etc.
Don’t confuse politeness and respect with caring for others. Even KKK is polite to their womenfolk. They may have cared for others in some abstract way, like Bible tells them to care for others. But when it came to minorities, women, they very much did not care.