How about we stick to the topic at hand rather than trying to "one up" each other by saying how "wrong" the other member is. It's like a freaking merry-go-round that has a broken lever...it goes on and on and on and on...
Go back and check my replies. I addressed your points one by one, based on the facts. If you can't see that, too bad.
No you failed a few along with classing me as some sort of criminal and a hater/phobia of Police Officers - Wonder where you dug that up - Could you substantiate that please.
So a couple of points so we can narrow things down.
Video I will say again can provide different interpretations by different people reviewing the same events - pople project there bias, personal opinions onto the video and overlook at times the points that contradict there opinion of events.
At 18:56:25 - a civilian arrived on the scene - I point out the time as you may have missed this - He was then escorted - bodily I might add away from the scene - Why -
The Police Officer inserts himeself between the Officer in the Yellow Gear - Why - He was losing it - No other reason to interfere - If the officer was under control and had the situation under control there was no need to intervene - He intevened most likely becasue he had the impression the Officer in the Yellow gear was going to Jump off the Deep End again.
1. You are always posting anti police comments.
2. When there is a confrontation, the police always want to keep civilians away from the situation for their own protection.
3. It is only your own opinion that the officer was 'losing it', not a fact.
You sir are full of it - You state I am anti police - I must have had some sort of problem with the law - Jesus - Throw around personal allegation based upon what? can you answer that?
Check my posts on police - What is your opinion of the tasering in Vancouver Aiport?
Now all these anti-police comments that I have made - what thread - post number - that would be helpful - or are you just making idle commentary?
"Police" don't even figure in this discussion. Anyone who gets up and stomps on the hood of a car is a nut case and hasn't got a leg to stand on. :lol:
More anti-cop rhetoric, eh goob?Only because he was kicking the windshield in. He has that talent - if you can call that a talent - Not something that would go on a resume i would say - scaring the Bejesus out of an old man - another talent. Wonder how he deals with difficult children.
More anti-cop rhetoric, eh goob?
More anti-cop rhetoric, eh goob?