Close. There are two groups. One says "science" while the other falls for highly politicized science-y sounding nonsense.No, there are two groups and one says science while the other says
![]()
You do realize that the climate has never been "stable" over any long period of time, right? You do understand that modern humans have been around for at least three dramatic climate shifts, none of which humans were responsible for, right?
You know the Greenland ice sheet that the AGW proponents keep shitting themselves over? It wasn't there 1100 years ago. Glaciers that are retreating today are retreating more slowly than they advanced during the LIA.
Over a half century of study and tracking have determined that volcanic activity has the largest effect on the polar vortex from earthbound activity.
Wood's Hole has determined that the Mid-Atlantic Ridge is far more active than originally believed. But yeah, that's got nothing to do with warmer ocean temps in the Atlantic. All those GHGs being released directly into the water wouldn't have any effect whatsoever.
It's kind of cute, in a way, how we think we're so powerful that we can outperform the engine that actually drives this planet.
But hey, you know science apparently.