Pissed! Surveillance camera video of firebomb attack

[Colpy]

All charges dropped? He can go about his life hassle free? Yes or no chrome dome?


DETAILS....pick up a few DETAILS before you gum flap.

The government is persecuting him.........the INSTANT the Crown dropped all self-defense charges, the charges of unsafe storage became IMPOSSIBLE to win. If he was justified in defending himself with his weapons, as the Crown has admitted in dropping all charges, then the fact he had those weapons out means that they were LEGITIMATELY in use, and NOT in storage. If they were NOT in storage, he can not be guilty of unsafe storage. That makes the continuation of those charges no more and no less than irresponsible persecution by the government.

It is called linear thought.....you should try it sometime.....most sane people use it constantly.

The fact this guy is not happy is because he has been, and continues to be, persecuted by the government in a completely unjust and uncalled for manner.

We should be outraged at that, and rally to his cause, instead of trying to imagine with approval new ways for the government to **** him over.

Geezus, you would have done well as a Stalinist commissar!

 

[petros]

Really? Impossible to win? Why impossible? Justified or lack of a evidence to convict?

Were the dangerous use charges dropped because he was within legal bounds or the Crown knows what they can and will use to do what they want to do to him?

Why is he up on IMPOSSIBLE charges? He sounds pretty damn CHARGED to me.

Why did you hitch your wagon filled with an unhinged sense of entitlement to a nut-bar with an on going history of having social issues?

This mans massive mistakes will linger in the air like a hot fart in a cold waiting room in the realms of firearm enthusiasts for a long long time.

What favours has he done to benefit your own personal privileges?

 

[Colpy]

Really? Impossible to win? Why impossible? Justified or lack of a evidence to convict?

Were the dangerous use charges dropped because he was within legal bounds or the Crown knows what they can and will use to do what they want to do to him?

Why is he up on IMPOSSIBLE charges? He sounds pretty damn CHARGED to me.

Why did you hitch your wagon filled with an unhinged sense of entitlement to a nut-bar with an on going history of having social issues?

This mans massive mistakes will linger in the air like a hot fart in a cold waiting room in the realms of firearm enthusiasts for a long long time.

What favours has he done to benefit your own personal privileges?

They are impossible to win because there is precedent.........and the precedent is that firearms that are in use can not be unsafely stored, because they are NOT in storage, they are in use.

So, when the Crown dropped the weapons charges, they conceded that Mr. Thompson's use of firearms was legitimate......if the guns were in use, they were not stored, so he can not be guilty of unsafe storage, which makes the Crown's continuing prosecution of Thompson worse than useless....it is persecution.

The man made no mistake in defending himself. You have already lost that argument completely.

 

[petros]

Dropping a charge doesn't mean he was innocecnt. Not at all. Where did you get an idea like that? The Crown always focuses on the sure bet with the most evidence.

If he was being attacked and left his home who was protecting the weapons he left out? What was stopping someone (the firetards) he didn't see from entering his home and arming themselves with his weapons?

If the police have had an ongoing problem with this guy and his neighbours expressing violent and anti-scoial behavour they are going to shut him down.

If this were someone without a string of prior potential violent incidents I'd agree with you 100%.

Like I say you picked the wrong guy to hitch your wagon of dreams to.

 

[Colpy]

Dropping a charge doesn't mean he was innocecnt. Not at all. Where did you get an idea like that? The Crown always focuses on the sure bet with the most evidence.

If he was being attacked and left his home who was protecting the weapons he left out? What was stopping someone (the firetards) he didn't see from entering his home and arming themselves with his weapons?

If the police have had an ongoing problem with this guy and his neighbours expressing violent and anti-scoial behavour they are going to shut him down.

If this were someone without a string of prior potential violent incidents I'd agree with you 100%.

Like I say you picked the wrong guy to hitch your wagon of dreams to.

What the hell is a "prior potential violent incident"?

They can't shut him down, he has done nothing wrong.

The problem is not your disagreeing with me, it is the fact that you can not accept that you were completely wrong from the outset.

Now you are simply inventing stuff in a hopeless attempt to fortify your position...

which has already been lost.

 

[petros]

Read ALL of the articles about the ongoing war between the neighbours that has had the police out there many many times.

Can you do that?

Six years of of ongoing incidents.


Try reading sect 428 & 446 of the Criminal Code.

Mr Thompson is no ****ig angel.

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

Read ALL of the articles about the ongoing war between the neighbours that has had the police out there many many times.

Can you do that?

Six years of of ongoing incidents.


Try reading sect 446 of the Criminal Code.

Still, molotov cocktails? Somebody comes to my house and starts heaving those around there wouldn't be any warning shots.

 

[petros]

Still, molotov cocktails? Somebody comes to my house and starts heaving those around there wouldn't be any warning shots.

They were charged for arson were they not?

 

[lone wolf]

Shoot to kill.... Leaves no conflicting statement and saves confusing the cops

 

[petros]

And a one way ticket to the hoosegow for exceeding the bounds of "reasonable force".

Killing animals, ongoing problems, firebombs, shooting warning shots.....would you want that in your community?

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

They were charged for arson were they not?

Attempted murder seems more fitting.

 

[lone wolf]

And a one way ticket to the hoosegow for exceeding the bounds of "reasonable force".

Killing animals, ongoing problems, firebombs, shooting warning shots.....would you want that in your community?

How? In the twenty or so minutes it would take for a fire truck to get out here, there would be plenty of evidence crumbling about to support a statement corroborated by gasoline residues on the recently departed's person.

It wouldn't be in my little community any more....

 

[DaSleeper]

How? In the twenty or so minutes it would take for a fire truck to get out here, there would be plenty of evidence crumbling about to support a statement corroborated by gasoline residues on the recently departed's person.

It wouldn't be in my little community any more....

This is useless to try to use common sense on that one..

Reminds me of teaching and dill pickles......;-)

 

[petros]

So? Who has the kahoogies to place a wager that Mr Thompson loses or doesn't lose his priveleges? He managed to previously walk away from two indicatables offences in the past six years of the building conflict.

 

[Colpy]

So? Who has the kahoogies to place a wager that Mr Thompson loses or doesn't lose his priveleges? He managed to previously walk away from two indicatables offences in the past six years of the building conflict.

Links?

 

[petros]

Try the one you posted in the very first post. Then look up the two criminal code sections I posted a a few posts back.

 

[Colpy]

Read ALL of the articles about the ongoing war between the neighbours that has had the police out there many many times.

Can you do that?

Six years of of ongoing incidents.


Try reading sect 428 & 446 of the Criminal Code.

Mr Thompson is no ****ig angel.

OH! I should have known....

You have nothing new, just more BS you pulled out of your arse.........

How old are you?

You have this incessant need for attention that usually manifests itself in those less than 10 years of age.

Quit wasting our time. You LOST the argument..........Thompson was never convicted of any act previously...........he was correct in using weapons to defend himself, as the Crown verified when they dropped all the charges related to that.

You HAVE heard of innocent until proven guilty, have you not? They could not prove him guilty, as they admit, so he is innocent.

The unsafe storage charges will be thrown out of court. A weapon that is in use can not be stored. And the Crown has already conceded the weapons were being legitimately used........

Are you so ****ing brain dead you can't understand that?

All the rest of your crap is simply irrelevant.

 

[DaSleeper]

OH! I should have known....


Are you so ****ing brain dead you can't understand that?

All the rest of your crap is simply irrelevant.

That avatar of his seems to portray an accident at birth.;-)

 

[petros]

OH! I should have known....

You have nothing new, just more BS you pulled out of your arse.........

How old are you?

You have this incessant need for attention that usually manifests itself in those less than 10 years of age.

Quit wasting our time. You LOST the argument..........Thompson was never convicted of any act previously...........he was correct in using weapons to defend himself, as the Crown verified when they dropped all the charges related to that.

You HAVE heard of innocent until proven guilty, have you not? They could not prove him guilty, as they admit, so he is innocent.

The unsafe storage charges will be thrown out of court. A weapon that is in use can not be stored. And the Crown has already conceded the weapons were being legitimately used........


All the rest of your crap is simply irrelevant.

If you don't think the entire history of this SIX YEAR PROBLEM for the community means nothing then you have absolutely no idea how the Crown works or why the see him as the loser he is.

Do you want to make a wager he loses his privileges for a at least 5 years? Yes or no?

 

[Colpy]

If you don't think the entire history of this SIX YEAR PROBLEM for the community means nothing then you have absolutely no idea how the Crown works or why the see him as the loser he is.

Do you want to make a wager he loses his privileges for a at least 5 years? Yes or no?

Here is a bulletin for you....the community is irrelevant in a debate over individual rights.

That is the difference between your socialist dogma and the political philosophies of freedom.

There is no such thing as a collective right.....the concept of collective rights only serves to destroy individual rights, and provides no liberty whatsoever.

If you disagree with that, you belong back in the old Soviet Union.

Now, as for bets on losing his rights? I'm sorry, the state can not grant or deny rights.......he can not lose his right, the only options for the State are to violate his rights, or to release him and return his weapons.........and the entire Firearms Act is a violation of our rights....so.....

What exactly do you wish to wager on?

What is the wager?