Pass the Freak Dijon Mustard Please

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The yields are signifigantly lower with GM crops and the production costs are signifigantly up so whatever our bugaboos about GM tech might be, the crap scienceis still an inefficent dangerous idea that fattens only the bankers. Normal plant and animal husbandry is proven scientifically GMOs are definately not.
The problem with modern agriculture is well understood to be A/ distribution and B/massive waste and C/ monopilization and consolodation serveing industrial and banking interests. The green revolution is directly from the sick mind of Rockerfeller. Your comment about what some people will accept is just plain funny (in a twisted sort of way) coming from someone who accepts the majesty of particle acclerators. Faith based worship Tonnington, it's an invasive slippery thing, gets in where you'd least expect it.:smile:
I'll have to agree with that whole heartedly.

The green revolution will be the restoration of the family farm, and nothing else.
Would be a nice thing to see, the reintroduction of the family farm and the decrease in the necessity of the over immunized live stock and agro biz.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
That was an awesome read Nugg, thanx.

Reminiscent of the French documentary I watched not to long ago on Monsanto. "The World According to Monsanto. Which was banned in the US, go figure.""

Thx, Bear. The one you mentioned is the one I was trying to find.

Scary.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
That was an awesome read Nugg, thanx.

Reminiscent of the French documentary I watched not to long ago on Monsanto. "The World According to Monsanto. Which was banned in the US, go figure.""

Thx, Bear. The one you mentioned is the one I was trying to find.

Scary.
Very scary stuff...

I did find this feel good story from Sask. though...

Local seed vs big guns

Seems if you can keep the legal bills going, you may actually be able to beat Monsanto at their own game. They had to pay to clean up and decontaminate Schmeiser's fields of their seeds.

I hope we see more seed savers and less dependence on GM seeds in the future. I hope some of the lessons being tought here are heeded.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Oh great, another strike from the Bush family.

Thanks for posting that DB. I do my best to avoid the modified foods but I fear we've gone too far to turn back now. :-(
I beg to differ. We grow our own veggies & fruit for the most part and we do it from unmodified seed (you can find it on the net and it has COG's, GOCA's, or someone else's seal of approval).
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Every food one eats today was developed by genetic research.

Who is foolish enough to say that the ORIGINAL potato was anything like the many great varieties of potatoes we enjoy today?

Same for corn, tomatoes, peppers, wheat, and just about everything one can think of. Or for that matter, beef, chicken, pork, lamb and turkey were all developed for maximum yield of meat, by genetic research and careful breeding.

Yet, fear-mongers would like nothing better than promote hunger, famine and malnutrition by spreading lies.

Anyone that refuses to eat GMO foods, deserves to suffer hunger, famine and malnutrition.
Bull shyte. I sell Gravenstein apples from my trees, which either are from the early 1900s or else trees that have been grown from the old ones. Some of them are older than the heads of companies modifying stuff.
Same thing about my cherry trees, plum trees, etc. There are too many people around still raising old species (plants AND animals) for the market to be absolutely full of modified foods.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Genetically modified organisms, so what about selective plant breeding then. Are they fine with that? Or is it just organisms which have foreign nucleic acids in their genome?

Genetically modified foods are one of those boogeymen like nuclear power, and stem cells, and particle accelerators that some people will never accept. Humans already consume more than the earth can sustainably provide, and if we want to feed people beyond the next few generations, we may need more food production than the green revolution the last half century gave us. This may require modified organisms which can be farmed in marginal and frontier areas/regions.
Ton, some people just don't like the idea of some company (companies) with its main focus on bottom line forcing them to eat what the company wants. This house contains some of those types of people. We are not on this planet to help some company playing god with food get rich.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Prove to me that the genetically modified potato/beef is chemically different from the regular potato/beef

Then prove to me that if I eat it I will die. I'd be willing to take my chances.

So far I had no chance to take my own chances. But if I had to trust anyone I would much rather trust Monsanto than some pinko, politically correct, starvation promoting, loving liberal.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Prove to me that the genetically modified potato/beef is chemically different from the regular potato/beef

Then prove to me that if I eat it I will die. I'd be willing to take my chances.

So far I had no chance to take my own chances. But if I had to trust anyone I would much rather trust Monsanto than some pinko, politically correct, starvation promoting, loving liberal.

Help yourself, you can test it for the rest of us. Trust Monsanto! My my but you are an innocent child aren't you.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
The yields are signifigantly lower with GM crops and the production costs are signifigantly up so whatever our bugaboos about GM tech might be, the crap scienceis still an inefficent dangerous idea that fattens only the bankers. Normal plant and animal husbandry is proven scientifically GMOs are definately not.

Not true. The yields are only marginally smaller in some cases, over all the difference is negligible. About 99% of GM crops are related to insect resistance and herbicide tolerance.

Today, over 60% of the world uses non-irrigated cropping systems. Irrigation is what gives industrialized cropping it's high yields. So, with water supplies moving in the opposite direction to human growth, how do you expect to be able to increase yields in the largest half of human agricultural production? I'm not making the case that GM does that now, I'm saying that maybe it could.

The problem with modern agriculture is well understood to be A/ distribution and B/massive waste and C/ monopilization and consolodation serveing industrial
and banking interests.
Right. This is true regardless of whether you're talking about traditional or biotech crops.

The green revolution is directly from the sick mind of Rockerfeller.
The green revolution gave Earth the capacity to feed almost 1 billion more people. That might be enough if developed nations could be more efficient.

Your comment about what some people will accept is just plain funny (in a twisted sort of way) coming from someone who accepts the majesty of particle acclerators.
My comment about particle accelerators was aimed more at the loons who thought a black hole was imminent. I suppose I could use your fervent denial of what has been observed as another example of what is wrong with these issues.

Faith based worship Tonnington, it's an invasive slippery thing, gets in where you'd least expect it.:smile:
:lol: Says the lord of proselytization for all things conspiracy here at CC.
 
Last edited:

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
I think if we just didn't let them patent the genes (or chemicals for that matter), the problem would solve itself.

Patenting genes strikes me like patenting the number 2. I know these people want a return on their investment, but still.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Not true. The yields are only marginally smaller in some cases, over all the difference is negligible. About 99% of GM crops are related to insect resistance and herbicide tolerance.

Today, over 60% of the world uses non-irrigated cropping systems. Irrigation is what gives industrialized cropping it's high yields. So, with water supplies moving in the opposite direction to human growth, how do you expect to be able to increase yields in the largest half of human agricultural production? I'm not making the case that GM does that now, I'm saying that maybe it could.

Right. This is true regardless of whether you're talking about traditional or biotech crops.

The green revolution gave Earth the capacity to feed almost 1 billion more people. That might be enough if developed nations could be more efficient.

My comment about particle accelerators was aimed more at the loons who thought a black hole was imminent. I suppose I could use your fervent denial of what has been observed as another example of what is wrong with these issues.

:lol: Says the lord of proselytization for all things conspiracy here at CC.

Heavy irrigation and heavy fertilization and high pesticide use coupled with hugh fuel costs all to provide signifigantly less nutritious food in addition to the destruction of sustainable agriculture. Everybody that was here before the so called green revolution fed themselves Tonnington, there was nothing in it for the people it was all for money. Developement along the industrial agriculture lines is very destructive very expensive all for poor quality suspect food. The rural types were needed in the factories and so they were driven from the lands by the machine.
Efficiencies are appreciated but the efficiency sought by the shareholders and those who need to eat are two distinctly different things. And now a word about erosion poor or no crop rotation and near complete dependence on hydro-carbons.
Agriculture is far too important to leave in the hands of investors and bankers.
Hey, when herbicide won't kill it maybe you shouldn't eat it.
We the eaters must move to no-till methods and water and soil conservation in general and suspend the reliance on chemical agents. Smaller is better, of every ten households one should be a farm. These methods have been proven to produce the yields and the nutrition, just because something that looks like a beautiful tomatoe can exist in your icebox for months, intact, does not mean it is a tomatoe, they used to rot because there was life in them. You do not have to take my word for it but we are beginning to see a true green revolution finally take off, people are way past tired of junk food and plastic wrap, it is a necessity of life and everyone of us just need to dwell on that far more than we do now, when the curve for food prices goes verticle in a few months we will understand. You got brains, fix it for us will you.:smile:
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"Help yourself, you can test it for the rest of us. Trust Monsanto! My my but you are an innocent child aren't you."

A while back we lived next to a cattle farm. Our water came from a well.

Just for curiousity we had the water tested. The test came back indicating that both my wife and I have been dead for several years, killed by E-coli. Tested second time, same results.

Needless to say, our health suffered no ill effects from the water declared unpotable by "authorities". But just to be sure, we installed ultra-violet light on our water line.

Sometimes we are our own worst enemies.

A potato is a potato is a potato. Bring it on. If you don't like it or you are scared ****less, starve!
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
"Help yourself, you can test it for the rest of us. Trust Monsanto! My my but you are an innocent child aren't you."

A while back we lived next to a cattle farm. Our water came from a well.

Just for curiousity we had the water tested. The test came back indicating that both my wife and I have been dead for several years, killed by E-coli. Tested second time, same results.

Needless to say, our health suffered no ill effects from the water declared unpotable by "authorities". But just to be sure, we installed ultra-violet light on our water line.

Sometimes we are our own worst enemies.

A potato is a potato is a potato. Bring it on. If you don't like it or you are scared ****less, starve!

Good general health can ward off e-coli. If we could buy dogturds made to look like potatoes would you eat them? I am a swineherd and part time chicken rancher and I grows a lot of my own veggies, it's the taste Yukon, try it, tastes like old time meat, it has got flavour it is loaded with goodies not the white crap sold in the supermarkets, so I can tell you that a potatoe is not just a potatoe, all potatoes are not created equal. If you're not frightened well I suppose repeating the old line like "where fools rush in" won't sway your thinking eh. I'm only afraid of lima beans.:smile:
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Prove to me that the genetically modified potato/beef is chemically different from the regular potato/beef

Then prove to me that if I eat it I will die. I'd be willing to take my chances.

So far I had no chance to take my own chances. But if I had to trust anyone I would much rather trust Monsanto than some pinko, politically correct, starvation promoting, loving liberal.
Funny, I'm nothing like any of those things and you don't trust me, must be cuz I'm 'Injun'...;-)

lol Some people just have no idea what the consequences of genetic engineering can do.

Looking Back at Genetic Engineering's First Deadly Disaster: L-tryptophan
Nice one LG.

A while back we lived next to a cattle farm. Our water came from a well.

Just for curiousity we had the water tested. The test came back indicating that both my wife and I have been dead for several years, killed by E-coli. Tested second time, same results.

Needless to say, our health suffered no ill effects from the water declared unpotable by "authorities". But just to be sure, we installed ultra-violet light on our water line.

Sometimes we are our own worst enemies.

A potato is a potato is a potato. Bring it on. If you don't like it or you are scared ****less, starve!
lol...I Salmon and Trout fish, I tie my own roe, have for years. SCB finally got into the mix and joined us. Got sick as a dog. Salmonella poisoning. Funny how me and the boys didn't get sick, Doc said it had to do with our bodies developing an immunity to it because we've been consuming it in small doses for so long.

Funny how the human body works.

Funny how even when the evidence is put in front of some people, they're to stupid to catch on...;-)