Palin in 2012

[SirJosephPorter]

The prescient Sarah is right, again.
American Thinker: Sarah Palin Outs Darth Vader

Indeed, as far as teabaggers are concerned, Sarah is prescient, she is also the President, that Muslim terrorist, illegal alien occupying the White House is an imposter.

That was really the only reason why extreme right supported McCain. If McCain had won, he was supposed to be a figure head only (like our GG), ruuber stamping every decision taken by Palin, with Palin governing from behind the scenes, making all the decisions.

Incidentally, Darth Vader is the nickname Democrats used for Dick Cheney. Surely Republicans can find another nickname for Obama? Do they have to copy Democrats? What is the matter, the usual epithets (Nazi, Communist, Muslim terrorist, USSR spy etc.) are not effective any more?

Calling Obama Darth Vader indicates singular lack of originality.

 

[Walter]

 

[Tonington]

The bear was shot shortly thereafter. But we're told that the bear adorns the entryway to Palin's home.

 

[Bace]

Seriously, after hearing this woman speak during the last Presidential campaign, why is she even in the newsworthy? Without the pandering media, she ahould have faded into obscurity two years ago.
In what other country on earth would this woman be considered for political office? I wouldn't vote her to my local PTA.

 

[Walter]

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_715.pdf
We'll see if our local Bamster lovers claim that this pollster is right wing because it says that Sarah and the Bamster are tied for a '12 election.
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[petros]

Voting for Palin makes about as much sense as voting for this thing:

YouTube - Paris Hilton - Paris For President (Music Video Preview)

 

[gopher]

Paris for President!

 

[Tonington]

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_715.pdf
We'll see if our local Bamster lovers claim that this pollster is right wing because it says that Sarah and the Bamster are tied for a '12 election.
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They're one of the best actually. I have their blog bookmarked. Her favourability since they started polling on Palin vs. Obama has fallen, but so has Obama's:

When we first started polling a Barack Obama/Sarah Palin Presidential contest in March of 2009 her favorability was 39/50 and she trailed Obama 55-35.

Now her favorability is actually even worse at 37/52, but she's knotted with Obama at 46%.

Makes you wonder how much the Republicans would be beating Obama by right now if they actually had any candidates people liked. And it certainly confirms that the shifts we've seen over the last year are all about Obama and not a sign of faith in the GOP hopefuls.

 

[ironsides]

They have to come up with a good looking person with charisma that says the right things. Someone totally new.

 

[petros]

Wanna know who will really rise up and take the Rep leadership for prez? Dick Cheney.

If you think you were going to get something purdy to ogle over think again. You're going to get Dick!

 

[ironsides]

I think that the Newt may be coming back. :lol:

Newt Gingrich

YouTube - Newt Gingrich: Impeach judges - Crush and Replace the Left - 2012 "Victory or Death!" Pt.5

 

[Tonington]

Should I say told ya so?

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/us-american-politics/85770-palin-2012-a-28.html#post1277197

 

[ironsides]

Should I say told ya so?

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/us-american-politics/85770-palin-2012-a-28.html#post1277197

Ok

 

[Tonington]

If the GOP is smart they'll pick Newt. If they're not smart...they'll pick Palin.

They appear to be moving towards Gingrich, again from PPP:
Public Policy Polling: Gingrich leads

 

[gopher]

Cheney for President!

 

[YukonJack]

Presidential election in 2012:

For the Republican Party it may or may not be Sarah Palin for President, but while it is more than two years away, but here is a safe bet:

For the Democratic Party it will NOT be Obama.

 

[JLM]

Presidential election in 2012:

For the Republican Party it may or may not be Sarah Palin for President, but while it is more than two years away, but here is a safe bet:

For the Democratic Party it will NOT be Obama.

How much do you want to wager on that? :smile:

 

[YukonJack]

JLM's challenge:

'How much do you want to wager on that? :icon_smile:'

JLM, I made my prediction based on one of two eventualities:

1. Obama will have a sudden attack of reality and realize that four years of futile attempts to fool the American people is long enough, and he will be honest enough to admit that slum agitating (i.e. community organizing) does not qualify one to be President

OR

2. Issue executive order to suspend elections and declare Himself President-for-life, like His idols Idi Amin, Emperor Bokassa, Robert Mugabe, Mao Tse Tung, Yossif Vissarionovitch Stalin and Pol Pot.

But since liberals are natural born liars, I am sure I would never be able collect, I place no wager.

 

[JLM]

Perhaps you can supply documentation of his support of the "worthies" you mention. The likes of S.J.P. may take offense at your last sentence.

 

[YukonJack]

'Perhaps you can supply documentation of his support of the "worthies" you mention.'

The first three "worthies" are self-evident. The others are manifested and clearly displayed and proven in Obama's appointments of his cronies.

No further documentation is required.

"The likes of S.J.P. may take offense at your last sentence."

Who in his/her right mind could care less about what SirJosephPorter thinks or takes offense to? He and his ilk offended far more people than I ever did or ever could.