This has been coming up for 1/2 a century, long before the public was allowed access to the Interwebs.Common knowledge. I think it is even in the rules someplace. Or maybe it was a thread a long time ago.
Actually, the Liberals had backing of some Conservatives & NDP’er in the early ‘70’s on this…but that was 50 years ago.So the upshot of all this is Liberals are soft on crime for some reason known only to themselves. And, of course the long suffering taxpayer is on the hook for not only the costs of the joke of a just us system, but also for the costs of stolen articles and damages done and resulting rise in insurance costs.
…& that plus time puts us where we are. Some will say, “But the Scoreboard says that there’s less crime and less this and less that and the other things…” but if you change the way you measure things, and then change the things that’re being measured, you can have the Scoreboard say whatever you want it to.They were the inevitable result of criminal justice, prison and parole measures passed by Canadian federal governments starting in the 1970s.
These were initially implemented by the Liberal government of then prime minister Pierre Trudeau, which openly acknowledged its intent was “to stress the rehabilitation of individuals rather than the protection of society.”
….& again, here we are.Five decades later, Canadians continue to reap the whirlwind of those decisions with hardened criminals arrested, charged and released on bail to commit more crimes or, upon conviction, receiving early parole, making a mockery of sentences pronounced in court.
“For too long a time now,” Goyer (Jean-Pierre Goyer, Papa Trudeau’s Solicitor General in 1971) said, “Blah blah blah” leading to “Consequently, we have decided from now on, to stress the rehabilitation of individuals rather than the protection of society … Our reforms will perhaps be criticized for being too liberal or for omitting to protect society against dangerous criminals. Indeed, this new rehabilitation policy will probably demand much striving and involve some risks …”
So the protection of society took a backseat to the Catch & Release program for violent repeat offenders that I suspect are responsible for the bulk of crimes.The practical effect of this Liberal philosophy, endorsed by the opposition of the time, was to elevate rehabilitation of the offender — however faint the hope it would occur — above other purposes of sentencing such as denouncing unlawful conduct, deterrence and the protection of society.
While the Conservative government of Stephen Harper attempted to re-establish the importance of the denunciation of unlawful conduct, deterrence and the protection of society in sentencing, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has steadily eroded those efforts, scrapping mandatory minimum sentences for serious gun crimes — as has the Supreme Court of Canada — and making bail even easier to obtain than in the past.
Five things to know about Liberal justice reforms in Bill C-75
OTTAWA — Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould introduced a massive bill Thursday aimed at tackling court delays and improving the fairness of the criminal justice …
nationalpost.com
If laws are “Not for the Protection of Society, but for the Rehabilitation of the Offender, or to keep the smelly Truckers with their Unacceptable Views (=different than what Justin declares) from blocking the view from Parliament” and the PM himself disregards the laws and ethics when convenient for himself and his Merry Band of Peoplekind-Arseholes that are just following his lead.