Omnibus Russia Ukraine crisis

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,094
113
Twin Moose Creek
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,607
3,307
113
Nuclear watchdog's worries grow over Ukraine plant safety
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
David Rising
Published May 07, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 4 minute read

KYIV, Ukraine — The head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog expressed growing anxiety about the safety of a Russian-occupied nuclear power plant near the front lines of fighting in Ukraine after the Moscow-installed governor of the area ordered the evacuation of the city where most plant staff live.


International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi spent months unsuccessfully trying to persuade Russian and Ukrainian officials to establish a security zone around the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant to prevent the war from causing a radiation leak.


Europe’s largest nuclear plant is located next to the occupied city of Enerhodar. Ukraine has regularly fired at the Russian side of the lines, while Russia has repeatedly shelled Ukrainian-held communities across the Dnieper River. The fighting has intensified as Ukraine prepares to launch a long-promised counteroffensive to reclaim ground taken by Russia.

Ukrainian authorities on Sunday said that a 72-year-old woman was killed and three others were wounded when Russian forces fired more than 30 shells at the city of Nikopol, about 10 kilometres across the river from the plant.


“The general situation in the area near the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant is becoming increasingly unpredictable and potentially dangerous,” Grossi warned Saturday.

The Ukrainian General Staff said Sunday that the evacuation from Enerhodar, the city near the plant, was underway.

Grossi said the evacuations of civilians from the city and 17 other communities that Yevgeny Balitsky, the Russia-installed governor of Ukraine’s partially occupied Zaporizhzhia province, ordered Friday suggested a further escalation.

“I’m extremely concerned about the very real nuclear safety and security risks facing the plant, he said. Although none of the plant’s six reactors are operating because of the war, the station needs a reliable power supply for cooling systems essential to preventing a potentially catastrophic radiation disaster.


Analysts have for months pointed to the southern Zaporizhzhia region as one of the possible targets of Ukraine’s expected spring counteroffensive, speculating that Kyiv’s forces might try to choke off Russia’s “land corridor” to the Crimean Peninsula and split Russian forces in two by pressing on to the Azov Sea coast.

Balitsky said Ukraine’s forces had intensified attacks on the area in the past several days.

Some of the fiercest ongoing fighting is in the eastern city of Bakhmut, where Ukrainian forces are still clinging to a position on the western outskirts despite Russia trying to take the city for more than nine months.

Russian Defence Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said Sunday that Moscow’s forces had captured two more districts in the city’s west and northwest, but provided no further details.


Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces on Saturday accused Russia of using phosphorus in the city and on Sunday released a new video showing the telltale white fire from such munitions.

International law prohibits the use of white phosphorus or other incendiary weapons — munitions designed to set fire to objects or cause burn injuries — in areas where there could be concentrations of civilians, though it can also be used for illumination or to create smoke screens.

It wasn’t possible to independently verify where the video was shot or when, but chemical weapons expert Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a former British army colonel, said it was clearly white phosphorus.

“This is being fired directly at Ukraine positions and this would be a war crime,” he said.


“I expect because the Russians have failed to take Bakmut conventionally, they are now using unconventional tactics to burn the Ukrainian soldiers to death or to get them to flee.”

Russian forces haven’t commented on the claim, but have rejected previous accusations from Ukraine that they had used phosphorus munitions.

In the south, an aide to the exiled Ukrainian mayor of the Russia-occupied coastal city of Mariupol said in a Telegram post Sunday that there was evidence that Moscow’s forces had intensified their transfer of tracked vehicles through the city and into Zaporizhzhia province.

Petro Andryushchenko claimed that more and more vehicles were being spotted crossing Mariupol “every day.”

He posted a short video showing heavy trucks transporting armoured vehicles along an expressway, without specifying where or when it was taken.


In Enerhodar, the first residents evacuated were those who took Russian citizenship following the capture of the city by Moscow early in the war, the General Staff of Ukraine’s armed forces said.

They were being taken to the Russia-occupied Azov Sea coast, about 200 kilometres to the southeast, which is where Mariupol is located.

Grossi said the staff that operates the nuclear power plant hadn’t been evacuated as of Saturday but that most live in Enerhodar and the situation has contributed to “increasingly tense, stressful and challenging conditions for personnel and their families.”

He added that IAEA experts at the nuclear site “are continuing to hear shelling on a regular basis.”

“We must act now to prevent the threat of a severe nuclear accident and its associated consequence for the population and the environment,” Grossi said. “This major nuclear facility must be protected. I will continue to press for a commitment by all sides to achieve this vital objective.”


Elsewhere, Russian shelling on Saturday and overnight killed six civilians and wounded four others in Ukraine’s southern Kherson region, according to a Telegram update published Sunday by the local administration.

Five civilians were wounded in the eastern Donetsk province, the epicentre of the fighting in recent months, local Gov. Pavlo Kyrylenko reported on Sunday morning.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces overnight attacked the largest port in Russia-occupied Crimea with drones, a Kremlin-installed local official said on Telegram early Sunday.

According to the post by Mikhail Razvozhayev, the governor of Sevastopol, 10 Ukrainian drones targeted the city, three of which were shot down by air defence systems. Razvozhayev said there was no damage.

— Joanna Kozlowska contributed to this story from London.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,369
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
Are the Ukrainians really doing ok? I'm hearing that things are much worse than is being portrayed by the MSM.
You're hearing wrong. Ukraine has a game changing weapon they are aboot to unleash on Russia. An AI battlefield information system that can analyze situations on the fly eliminating hours and even days of pondering by command.

We are going to see an offensive that will use efficiency over brute force.

Imagine the information a couple hundred drones can gather over a battlefield being processed nearly instantly with that information being used to pick targets and fire on them within seconds. There is no where to hide.

Such a system is 10X deadlier than any tactical nuke.

 

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,966
547
113
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
Are the Ukrainians really doing ok? I'm hearing that things are much worse than is being portrayed by the MSM.
A legitimate question but perhaps what the Russians think of how Ukrainians are doing is more germane; I watched some video last night of Russian soldiers deserting the field/running for their lives they sure believe the Ukes have the advantage and if they didn't before they were just handed it by Russian cowardice.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,253
5,879
113
Olympus Mons
Are the Ukrainians really doing ok? I'm hearing that things are much worse than is being portrayed by the MSM.
Yes and no. The Ukrainians have taken a beating, particularly in Vulhedar and Backmut but have dished out a bigger beating on the Russians. The major difference is now. While Russia scrambles to throw untrained conscripts into the situation and dips into it's "strategic tank reserve" of Soviet-era armour, the Ukrainians are actually getting better and better trained troops and better equipment. Russian tank losses over the last year have proven to be difficult to impossible to replace in any kind of timely manner or numbers. Ukrainian tank losses are being replaced with both Western armour and properly updated/upgraded Soviet-era armour from former Soviet-bloc countries.
In fact they're getting all kinds of military hardware that the Russians aren't getting and can't easily replace. Meanwhile the Russians have been stupid. Take their T-90's. They have a serious weakness, their reverse speed is barely 4km/h. There's a company that developed a new transmission for the T-90 and all of it variants that allows them to reverse at close to 30km/h. All the countries with T-90s replaced the tranny, except Russia.

Don't get me wrong, it's not all sunshine and roses for Ukraine. If the Ukrainian counter-offensive doesn't go very well or accomplish much with great materiel loss, they may see a significant decrease in Western support in the way of arms shipments.
However by all accounts, even among the Russian propagandists, the Ukrainians are proving to be quite adept and efficient at learning Western tactics and getting familiar with Western military equipment and employing that knowledge with a high level of skill.
They also have one other major advantage over the Russians, for now. The Ukrainians learn from their tactical errors while the Russians keep making the same tactical blunders over and over and over and over....